Effects of an Artificial Intelligence Platform for Behavioral Interventions on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: Randomized Clinical Trial.
anxiety
artificial intelligence
augmentation
cognitive-behavioral therapy
community-based center
depression
depressive
evidence-based practices
health force burnout
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 07 2023
10 07 2023
Historique:
received:
24
02
2023
accepted:
23
06
2023
revised:
02
04
2023
medline:
12
7
2023
pubmed:
10
7
2023
entrez:
10
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The need for scalable delivery of mental health care services that are efficient and effective is now a major public health priority. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to improve behavioral health care services by helping clinicians collect objective data on patients' progress, streamline their workflow, and automate administrative tasks. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an AI platform for behavioral health in facilitating better clinical outcomes for patients receiving outpatient therapy. The study was conducted at a community-based clinic in the United States. Participants were 47 adults referred for outpatient, individual cognitive behavioral therapy for a main diagnosis of a depressive or anxiety disorder. The platform provided by Eleos Health was compared to a treatment-as-usual (TAU) approach during the first 2 months of therapy. This AI platform summarizes and transcribes the therapy session, provides feedback to therapists on the use of evidence-based practices, and integrates these data with routine standardized questionnaires completed by patients. The information is also used to draft the session's progress note. Patients were randomized to receive either therapy provided with the support of an AI platform developed by Eleos Health or TAU at the same clinic. Data analysis was carried out based on an intention-to-treat approach from December 2022 to January 2023. The primary outcomes included the feasibility and acceptability of the AI platform. Secondary outcomes included changes in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) scores as well as treatment attendance, satisfaction, and perceived helpfulness. A total of 72 patients were approached, of whom 47 (67%) agreed to participate. Participants were adults (34/47, 72% women and 13/47, 28% men; mean age 30.64, SD 11.02 years), with 23 randomized to the AI platform group, and 24 to TAU. Participants in the AI group attended, on average, 67% (mean 5.24, SD 2.31) more sessions compared to those in TAU (mean 3.14, SD 1.99). Depression and anxiety symptoms were reduced by 34% and 29% in the AI platform group versus 20% and 8% for TAU, respectively, with large effect sizes for the therapy delivered with the support of the AI platform. No group difference was found in 2-month treatment satisfaction and perceived helpfulness. Further, therapists using the AI platform submitted their progress notes, on average, 55 hours earlier than therapists in the TAU group (t=-0.73; P<.001). In this randomized controlled trial, therapy provided with the support of Eleos Health demonstrated superior depression and anxiety outcomes as well as patient retention, compared with TAU. These findings suggest that complementing the mental health services provided in community-based clinics with an AI platform specializing in behavioral treatment was more effective in reducing key symptoms than standard therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05745103; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05745103.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The need for scalable delivery of mental health care services that are efficient and effective is now a major public health priority. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to improve behavioral health care services by helping clinicians collect objective data on patients' progress, streamline their workflow, and automate administrative tasks.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an AI platform for behavioral health in facilitating better clinical outcomes for patients receiving outpatient therapy.
METHODS
The study was conducted at a community-based clinic in the United States. Participants were 47 adults referred for outpatient, individual cognitive behavioral therapy for a main diagnosis of a depressive or anxiety disorder. The platform provided by Eleos Health was compared to a treatment-as-usual (TAU) approach during the first 2 months of therapy. This AI platform summarizes and transcribes the therapy session, provides feedback to therapists on the use of evidence-based practices, and integrates these data with routine standardized questionnaires completed by patients. The information is also used to draft the session's progress note. Patients were randomized to receive either therapy provided with the support of an AI platform developed by Eleos Health or TAU at the same clinic. Data analysis was carried out based on an intention-to-treat approach from December 2022 to January 2023. The primary outcomes included the feasibility and acceptability of the AI platform. Secondary outcomes included changes in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) scores as well as treatment attendance, satisfaction, and perceived helpfulness.
RESULTS
A total of 72 patients were approached, of whom 47 (67%) agreed to participate. Participants were adults (34/47, 72% women and 13/47, 28% men; mean age 30.64, SD 11.02 years), with 23 randomized to the AI platform group, and 24 to TAU. Participants in the AI group attended, on average, 67% (mean 5.24, SD 2.31) more sessions compared to those in TAU (mean 3.14, SD 1.99). Depression and anxiety symptoms were reduced by 34% and 29% in the AI platform group versus 20% and 8% for TAU, respectively, with large effect sizes for the therapy delivered with the support of the AI platform. No group difference was found in 2-month treatment satisfaction and perceived helpfulness. Further, therapists using the AI platform submitted their progress notes, on average, 55 hours earlier than therapists in the TAU group (t=-0.73; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS
In this randomized controlled trial, therapy provided with the support of Eleos Health demonstrated superior depression and anxiety outcomes as well as patient retention, compared with TAU. These findings suggest that complementing the mental health services provided in community-based clinics with an AI platform specializing in behavioral treatment was more effective in reducing key symptoms than standard therapy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05745103; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05745103.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37428547
pii: v25i1e46781
doi: 10.2196/46781
pmc: PMC10366966
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05745103']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e46781Informations de copyright
©Shiri Sadeh-Sharvit, T Del Camp, Sarah E Horton, Jacob D Hefner, Jennifer M Berry, Eyal Grossman, Steven D Hollon. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 10.07.2023.
Références
J Biopharm Stat. 2001 Feb-May;11(1-2):9-21
pubmed: 11459446
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(S1):S94-S101
pubmed: 30699023
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 06;13:990370
pubmed: 36147984
JAMA. 2015 Sep 22-29;314(12):1227-8
pubmed: 26181890
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 16;6(8):e39846
pubmed: 35972782
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):813-824
pubmed: 32682460
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Nov 26;7(11):e20646
pubmed: 33242025
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 31;12(1):5455
pubmed: 35361809
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Sep;47(5):795-843
pubmed: 32715427
BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3164
pubmed: 32909959
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 8;12(1):13527
pubmed: 35941352
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Apr;32(2):420-445
pubmed: 36461629
Psychol Serv. 2017 Nov;14(4):543-548
pubmed: 29120212
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):998-1005
pubmed: 33511572
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jan;45(1):48-61
pubmed: 27631610
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Jan;90(1):39-50
pubmed: 34410750
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Apr 01;11(4):536-538
pubmed: 34634890
Rand Health Q. 2018 Apr 1;7(3):4
pubmed: 29607248
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 21;23(1):32
pubmed: 35189813
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 13;10(2):
pubmed: 35206978
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2021 Sep;44(3):219-228
pubmed: 33998824