<Editors' Choice> Long-term outcomes of lateral skull base reconstruction with a free omental flap and facial nerve reconstruction.
facial nerve
omental flap
reconstruction
skull base
Journal
Nagoya journal of medical science
ISSN: 2186-3326
Titre abrégé: Nagoya J Med Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 0412011
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
25
12
2020
accepted:
08
06
2022
medline:
22
6
2023
pubmed:
22
6
2023
entrez:
22
6
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In lateral skull base reconstruction, it is necessary to seal the defect in the lateral skull base, fill the dead space, and, sometimes, reconstruct the facial nerve. However, this procedure is difficult to perform with a standard musculocutaneous flap. Therefore, for such cases, an omental flap is used in our hospital because of its flexibility. In this study, we report our experience with the procedure (lateral skull base reconstruction with a free omental flap) and its long-term outcome and facial nerve reconstruction, with special focus on facial nerve recovery. This study is a technical note and a retrospective review. It was conducted in Nagoya University Hospital. Overall, 16 patients (12 women and 4 men; mean age: 55.1 years) underwent lateral skull base reconstruction with a free omental flap after subtotal temporal bone resection or lateral temporal bone resection during 2005-2017. The main outcome measures were postoperative complications and facial nerve recovery: Yanagihara score and House-Brackmann grading system. Complications included partial necrosis and minor cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 2 patients. Facial nerve recovery could be observed more than 12 months after surgery, with a mean Yanagihara score of 19.6 and House-Brackmann grade of 3.60. The free omental flap is a reliable method for lateral skull base reconstruction, especially in cases where facial nerve reconstruction is needed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on facial nerve recovery after lateral skull base reconstruction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37346845
doi: 10.18999/nagjms.85.2.255
pmc: PMC10281835
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
255-264Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.
Références
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Oct;78(4):471-9
pubmed: 2945217
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jun;154(6):1014-8
pubmed: 26980913
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(6):607-14
pubmed: 17485047
Microsurgery. 2014 Nov;34(8):623-8
pubmed: 24817431
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015 Aug;76(4):257-61
pubmed: 26225312
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975 Aug;56(2):171-7
pubmed: 1144556
Cell Tissue Res. 2007 Jun;328(3):487-97
pubmed: 17468892
Aust N Z J Surg. 1997 Jul;67(7):452-6
pubmed: 9236613
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 May;133(5):490-4
pubmed: 17520764
Head Neck. 2008 May;30(5):589-94
pubmed: 18213723
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Oct;110(5):1303-9
pubmed: 12360072
Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Aug;57(2):169-75; discussion 176
pubmed: 16861997
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2010 Mar;27(3):185-96
pubmed: 20229256
Br J Plast Surg. 1993 Jul;46(5):426-9
pubmed: 8369881
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2013 Oct;74(5):311-6
pubmed: 24436930
Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Dec;41(6):633-9
pubmed: 9869137
Laryngoscope. 2016 Aug;126(8):1911-7
pubmed: 26466854
Head Neck. 2015 Sep;37(9):1387-91
pubmed: 24797502
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29184
pubmed: 22195018
Skull Base. 2007 Feb;17(1):79-88
pubmed: 17603647
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2015 Apr;32(2):137-44
pubmed: 24807103