Comparison of the recurrence rate of different surgical techniques for oral mucocele: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.


Journal

Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal
ISSN: 1698-6946
Titre abrégé: Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101231694

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 10 03 2023
accepted: 29 05 2023
medline: 31 10 2023
pubmed: 18 6 2023
entrez: 18 6 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There are different surgical techniques to remove Oral mucoceles, including conventional surgery with scalpel, removal of the lesion with CO2 laser, and micro marsupialization. The present systematic review was conducted with the aim of comparing the recurrence rate of different surgical techniques for treatment of the oral mucoceles. An electronic search for randomized controlled trials published in English until September 2022 related to different surgical methods for the treatment of oral mucocele was performed in Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to compare the recurrence rate of different techniques. Among 1204 papers initially identified, after the removal of duplicate articles and screening of the titles and abstracts, fourteen full-text articles were reviewed. Seven articles comparing the recurrence rate of oral mucocele in different surgical techniques were found. Seven studies were included in qualitative studies, and five articles were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of mucocele recurrence in the micro-marsupialization technique was 1.30 times that of the surgical excision with scalpel technique, which was not statistically significant. The risk of mucocele recurrence in the CO2 Laser Vaporization technique was 0.60 times that of the Surgical Excision with Scalpel technique, which was not statistically significant. The results of this systematic review showed that there is no significant difference between the recurrence rate of surgical excision, CO2 laser and marsupialization techniques for the treatment of oral mucoceles. Although more randomized clinical trials are needed for definitive results.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
There are different surgical techniques to remove Oral mucoceles, including conventional surgery with scalpel, removal of the lesion with CO2 laser, and micro marsupialization. The present systematic review was conducted with the aim of comparing the recurrence rate of different surgical techniques for treatment of the oral mucoceles.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
An electronic search for randomized controlled trials published in English until September 2022 related to different surgical methods for the treatment of oral mucocele was performed in Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to compare the recurrence rate of different techniques.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 1204 papers initially identified, after the removal of duplicate articles and screening of the titles and abstracts, fourteen full-text articles were reviewed. Seven articles comparing the recurrence rate of oral mucocele in different surgical techniques were found. Seven studies were included in qualitative studies, and five articles were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of mucocele recurrence in the micro-marsupialization technique was 1.30 times that of the surgical excision with scalpel technique, which was not statistically significant. The risk of mucocele recurrence in the CO2 Laser Vaporization technique was 0.60 times that of the Surgical Excision with Scalpel technique, which was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results of this systematic review showed that there is no significant difference between the recurrence rate of surgical excision, CO2 laser and marsupialization techniques for the treatment of oral mucoceles. Although more randomized clinical trials are needed for definitive results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37330953
pii: 26015
doi: 10.4317/medoral.26015
pmc: PMC10635632
doi:

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e614-e621

Références

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jan;65(1):117-21
pubmed: 17174775
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jul-Sep;30(3):188-91
pubmed: 23263419
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):353-356
pubmed: 33911421
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Sep;22(5):318-23
pubmed: 22092694
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jul;46(5):355-7
pubmed: 18495305
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jul 1;9(7):e925-e928
pubmed: 28828162
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 28;10(10):e038638
pubmed: 33115895
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):554-61
pubmed: 23826649
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):855-8
pubmed: 17448832
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Case Rep Dent. 2014;2014:723130
pubmed: 25215249
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41(4):305-307
pubmed: 28650779
Quintessence Int. 2014 Apr;45(4):331-8
pubmed: 24459677
Pediatr Dent. 2000 Mar-Apr;22(2):155-8
pubmed: 10769864
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul-Dec;6(2):204-209
pubmed: 28299258
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009 Sep 01;14(9):e469-74
pubmed: 19415059
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Mar 1;24(2):e231-e235
pubmed: 30818316
J Laryngol Otol. 1988 Apr;102(4):322-7
pubmed: 3385322
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;41(12):1527-31
pubmed: 22613811
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2021 Jun;54(3):543-551
pubmed: 34024482
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Jun;13(2):143-6
pubmed: 22762178
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Apr;53(4):332-5
pubmed: 25631396
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;37(1):55-68
pubmed: 30454780
Lasers Med Sci. 2004;19(1):12-4
pubmed: 15316853
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2011 Jul;27(7):276-9
pubmed: 21757145
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug;7(Suppl 2):S731-3
pubmed: 26538955
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Sep-Oct;82(5):536-42
pubmed: 26832636
Case Rep Dent. 2020 Oct 03;2020:8855759
pubmed: 33083064
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;10(1):95-97
pubmed: 31205396
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017 Dec;16(4):491-496
pubmed: 29038633
J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Summer;8(Suppl 1):S1-S6
pubmed: 29263776

Auteurs

M Hashemi (M)

Department of oral and maxillofacial medicine Faculty of Dentistry University Street, Tabriz, Iran k_katebi@yahoo.co.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH