COMPARISON OF HEARING OUTCOMES AFTER STAPES SURGERY DEPENDING ON PROSTHESIS TYPE: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS.
Hearing
Outcome
Prosthesis
Stapedectomy
Stapedotomy
Surgery
Journal
Acta clinica Croatica
ISSN: 1333-9451
Titre abrégé: Acta Clin Croat
Pays: Croatia
ID NLM: 9425483
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
medline:
1
6
2023
pubmed:
30
5
2023
entrez:
30
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stapes surgery is generally performed to treat otosclerosis, and there are numerous surgical techniques and prosthesis materials available. Critical evaluation of postoperative hearing outcomes is crucial for identification and further improvement of treatment options. This study is a non-randomized retrospective analysis of hearing threshold levels before and after stapedectomy or stapedotomy in 365 patients during a twenty-year period. The patients were classified into three groups depending on the prosthesis and surgery type: stapedectomy with Schuknecht prosthesis placement and stapedotomy with either Causse or Richard prosthesis. The postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was calculated by subtracting the bone conduction pure tone-audiogram (PTA) from the air conduction PTA. Hearing threshold levels were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively from 250 Hz to 12 kHz. The results showed air-bone gap reduction <10 dB in 72% patients, 70% of patients, and 76% of patients using Schucknecht's prosthesis, Richard prosthesis, and Causse prosthesis, respectively. The results did not differ significantly between three prothesis types. Choice of prosthesis should be made individually for each patient, but surgeon competency is still the most important outcome variable, regardless of prosthesis type.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37250664
doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s4.5
pii: acc-61_supp4-41
pmc: PMC10218077
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
41-46Références
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001 Oct;110(10):907-11
pubmed: 11642421
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018 Apr;51(2):375-392
pubmed: 29397948
J Int Adv Otol. 2020 Aug;16(2):234-240
pubmed: 32784162
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2008 Jun;35(2):181-4
pubmed: 18022336
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018 Apr;51(2):275-290
pubmed: 29502722
Laryngoscope. 2002 Nov;112(11):2046-50
pubmed: 12439178
Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;65:169-173
pubmed: 17245041
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jun;32(4):520-8
pubmed: 21765384
Acta Otolaryngol. 2012 Nov;132(11):1151-4
pubmed: 22831174
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2018 Apr;51(2):393-404
pubmed: 29502725
Am J Otol. 1982 Oct;4(2):112-7
pubmed: 7148999
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Aug;133(8):758-62
pubmed: 17709611
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec;30(8):1122-7
pubmed: 19816231
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1958 Dec;67(4):932-51
pubmed: 13606689
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981 Nov-Dec;90(6 Pt 1):633-6
pubmed: 7316389
Laryngoscope. 2016 Jan;126(1):182-90
pubmed: 26108164