Mapping emerging technologies in aged care: results from an in-depth online research.
Active aging
Aged care
Emerging technologies
Ethical issues
Older adults
Review
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 May 2023
23 May 2023
Historique:
received:
09
01
2023
accepted:
08
05
2023
medline:
25
5
2023
pubmed:
24
5
2023
entrez:
23
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emerging Technologies (ETs) have recently acquired great relevance in elderly care. The exceptional experience with SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has emphasized the usefulness of ETs in the assistance and remote monitoring of older adults. Technological devices have also contributed to the preservation of social interactions, thus reducing isolation and loneliness. The general purpose of this work is to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of the technologies currently employed in elderly care. This objective was achieved firstly, by mapping and classifying the ETs currently available on the market and, secondly, by assessing the impact of such ETs on elderly care, exploring the ethical values promoted, as well as potential ethical threats. An in-depth search was carried out on Google search engine, by using specific keywords (e.g. technology, monitoring techniques, ambient intelligence; elderly, older adults; care and assistance). Three hundred and twenty-eight technologies were originally identified. Then, based on a predetermined set of inclusion-exclusion criteria, two hundreds and twenty-two technologies were selected. A comprehensive database was elaborated, where the two hundred and twenty-two ETs selected were classified as follows: category; developmental stage; companies and/or partners; functions; location of development; time of development; impact on elderly care; target; website. From an in-depth qualitative analysis, some ethically-related contents and themes emerged, namely: questions related to safety, independence and active aging, connectedness, empowerment and dignity, cost and efficiency. Although not reported by developers, a close analysis of website contents highlights that positive values are often associated with potential risks, notably privacy threats, deception, dehumanization of care. Research findings may ultimately lead to a better understanding of the impact of ETs on elderly people.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Emerging Technologies (ETs) have recently acquired great relevance in elderly care. The exceptional experience with SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has emphasized the usefulness of ETs in the assistance and remote monitoring of older adults. Technological devices have also contributed to the preservation of social interactions, thus reducing isolation and loneliness. The general purpose of this work is to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of the technologies currently employed in elderly care. This objective was achieved firstly, by mapping and classifying the ETs currently available on the market and, secondly, by assessing the impact of such ETs on elderly care, exploring the ethical values promoted, as well as potential ethical threats.
METHODS
METHODS
An in-depth search was carried out on Google search engine, by using specific keywords (e.g. technology, monitoring techniques, ambient intelligence; elderly, older adults; care and assistance). Three hundred and twenty-eight technologies were originally identified. Then, based on a predetermined set of inclusion-exclusion criteria, two hundreds and twenty-two technologies were selected.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A comprehensive database was elaborated, where the two hundred and twenty-two ETs selected were classified as follows: category; developmental stage; companies and/or partners; functions; location of development; time of development; impact on elderly care; target; website. From an in-depth qualitative analysis, some ethically-related contents and themes emerged, namely: questions related to safety, independence and active aging, connectedness, empowerment and dignity, cost and efficiency. Although not reported by developers, a close analysis of website contents highlights that positive values are often associated with potential risks, notably privacy threats, deception, dehumanization of care.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Research findings may ultimately lead to a better understanding of the impact of ETs on elderly people.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37221528
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09513-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-09513-5
pmc: PMC10204691
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
528Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Ganesan B, Gowda T, Al-Jumaily A, Fong K, Meena SK, Tong R. Ambient assisted living technologies for older adults with cognitive and physical impairments: a review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Jan1.
Sundgren S, Stolt M, Suhonen R. Ethical issues related to the use of gerontechnology in older people care: a scoping review. Nurs Ethics. 2020 Feb;27(1):88–103.
Ji YA, Kim HS. Scoping review of the literature on Smart Healthcare for older adults. Yonsei Med J. 2022;63(Suppl):14.
doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.S14
Hanson GJ, Takahashi PY, Pecina JL. Emerging technologies to support independent living of older adults at risk. Care management journals. 2013 Mar 1; 14(1): 58–64.
Ho A. Are we ready for artificial intelligence health monitoring in elder care? BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):1–7.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01764-9
Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of “smart home” applications. Yearb Med Inform. 2008;17(01):33–40.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1638580
Stavropoulos TG, Papastergiou A, Mpaltadoros L, Nikolopoulos S, Kompatsiaris I. IoT wearable sensors and devices in elderly care: A literature review. Sens 2020 Jan; 20(10): 2826.
Byrne CA, Collier R, O’Hare GMP. A review and classification of assisted Living Systems. Information. 2018;9(7):182.
doi: 10.3390/info9070182
Rotolo D, Hicks D, Martin BR. What is an emerging technology? Res Policy. 2015;44(10):1827–43.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006
Thangavel G, Memedi M, Hedström K. Customized Information and Communication Technology for Reducing Social Isolation and Loneliness Among Older Adults: Scoping Review. JMIR mental health. 2022 Mar 7;9(3):e34221.
World Health Organization. Active ageing: a policy framework. World Health Organization; 2002.
World Health Organization. Patient engagement. 2016.
Hooyman N. In: Kiyak H, editor. Social Gerontology. 5th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1999.
Czaja S, Beach S, Charness N, Schulz R. Older adults and the adoption of healthcare technology: Opportunities and challenges. In: Sixsmith A, Gutman G, editors. Technologies for active aging. New York: Springer; 2013. pp. 27–46.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8348-0_3
Predel C, Timmermann C, Ursin F, Orzechowski M, Ropinski T, Steger F. Conflicting Aims and Values in the Application of Smart Sensors in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Ethical Analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2022 Jun 23;10(6):e32910.
Schicktanz S, Schweda M. Aging 4.0? Rethinking the ethical framing of technology-assisted eldercare. Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Sep;43(3):1–9.
Howes J, Gastmans C. Electronic tracking devices in dementia care: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Jul;1:95:104419.
Vandemeulebroucke T, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Welbergen L, Massart M, Gastmans C. The ethics of socially assistive robots in aged care. A focus group study with older adults in Flanders, Belgium. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B. 2020 Nov;75(9):1996–2007.
Wang S, Bolling K, Mao W, Reichstadt J, Jeste D, Kim HC, Nebeker C. Technology to Support Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Perspectives. Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Apr 10;7(2): 60.
Howes J, Denier Y, Gastmans C. Electronic Tracking Devices for People With Dementia: Content Analysis of Company Websites. JMIR aging 2022 Nov 11; 5(4):e38865.
Downe-Wambolt B. Content analysis: method, applications and issues. Health Care Women Int. 1992;13:313–21.
doi: 10.1080/07399339209516006
Kleinheksel AJ, Rockich-Winston N, Tawfik H, Wyatt TR. Demystifying content analysis. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(1):127–37.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe7113
Assarroudi A, Heshmati Nabavi F, Armat MR, Ebadi A, Vaismoradi M. Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. J Res Nurs. 2018: 1–14.
Gastmans C. Dignity-enhancing nursing care: a foundational ethical framework. Nurs Ethics. 2013 Mar;20(2):142–9.
Sanchini V, Sala R, Gastmans C. The concept of vulnerability in aged care: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec;23(1):1–20.
Beauchamp T, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
Childress JF, Faden RR, Gaare RD, Gostin LO, Kahn J, Bonnie RJ, Kass NE, Mastroianni AC, Moreno JD, Nieburg P. Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(2):170–8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2002.tb00384.x
pubmed: 12066595
Vandemeulebroucke T, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Gastmans C. The use of care robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 2018 Jan 1; 74: 15–25.
Lehoux P, Grimard D. When robots care: public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults. Social science & medicine. 2018 Aug. 2018;1:211: 330–7.
Gómez-Vírseda C, De Maeseneer Y, Gastmans C. Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;20(1):1–15.
Sanchini V, Marelli L. Data protection and ethical issues in European P5 eHealth. P5 eHealth: An agenda for the health Technologies of the Future. 2020:173.
Ienca M, Wangmo T, Jotterand F, Kressig RW, Elger B. Ethical Design of Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia: A Descriptive Review. Science and engineering ethics. 2018 Aug; 24(4): 1035–55.
Zhu J, Shi K, Yang C, Niu Y, Zeng Y, Zhang N, Liu T, Chu CH. Ethical issues of smart home-based elderly care: A scoping review. J Nurs Adm Manag. 2021 Nov 22.
Martinez-Martin N, Luo Z, Kaushal A, Adeli E, Haque A, Kelly SS, Wieten S, Cho MK, Magnus D, Fei-Fei L, Schulman K. Ethical issues in using ambient intelligence in health-care settings. The Lancet Digital Health. 2021 Feb 1;3(2):e115-23.
Schweda M, Kirste T, Hein A, Teipel S, Schicktanz S. The emergence of co-intelligent monitoring and assistive technologies in dementia care-an outline of technological trends and ethical aspects. In Bioethica Forum 2020 (Vol. 12, pp. 29–37).
Pirzada P, Wilde A, Doherty GH, Harris-Birtill D. Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults. Inform Health Soc Care. 2022;Jan2(1):10–37.
doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500
Morte-Ferrer R, Toboso-Martín M, Aparicio Payá M, Ausín Díez T, Monasterio Astobiza A, López Castro D. Personal autonomy in elderly and disabled: how assistive technologies impact on it. In: Haltaufderheide J, Hovemann J, Vollmann J, editors. Aging between participation and simulation: ethical dimensions of socially assistive technologies in elderly care. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2020. pp. 185–98.
Leikas J, Kulju M. Ethical consideration of home monitoring technology: A qualitative focus group study. Gerontechnology 2018 Mar 1; 17(1): 38–47.
Portacolone E, Halpern J, Luxenberg J, Harrison KL, Covinsky KE. Ethical Issues Raised by the Introduction of Artificial Companions to Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Call for Interdisciplinary Collaborations. J Alzheimer’s disease 2020 Jan 1; 76(2), 445–55.
Wangmo T, Lipps M, Kressig RW, Ienca M. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders. BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;20(1):1–1.
Chung J, Demiris G, Thompson HJ. Ethical considerations regarding the Use of Smart Home Technologies for older adults: an integrative review. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2016;34(1):155–81.
doi: 10.1891/0739-6686.34.155
pubmed: 26673381
Nakazawa E, Yamamoto K, London AJ, Akabayashi A. Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethics. BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec;22(1):1–0.
Sallinen M, Hentonen O, Teeri S. Ethical dilemmas related to the use of safety technology in service house environments. Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Mar;34(1):199–205.
Tan SY, Taeihagh A. Governing the adoption of robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care in Singapore. Policy and society. 2021 Jun;40(2):211–31.
Mois G, Beer JM. The role of Healthcare Robotics in providing support to older adults: a Socio-ecological perspective. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2020 Jun;9(2):82–9.
Hung L, Liu C, Woldum E, Au-Yeung A, Berndt A, Wallsworth C, Horne N, Gregorio M, Mann J, Chaudhury H. The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2019 Dec;19(1):1–0.