Behavioural differences in predator aware and predator naïve Wellington tree wētā,

Anti-predator behaviour Behavioural adaptation Behavioural repeatability Consistent individual differences Ecosanctuary Introduced predator Predation Predator-free fencing

Journal

Current research in insect science
ISSN: 2666-5158
Titre abrégé: Curr Res Insect Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918231903506676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 30 06 2022
revised: 30 04 2023
accepted: 02 05 2023
medline: 22 5 2023
pubmed: 22 5 2023
entrez: 22 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Insects have evolved a wide range of behavioural traits to avoid predation, with anti-predator behaviours emerging as important adaptive responses to the specific strategies employed by predators. These responses may become ineffective, however, when a species is introduced to a novel predator type. When individuals cannot recognise an introduced predator for instance, they may respond in ways that mean they fail to avoid, escape, or neutralize a predator encounter. New Zealand's endemic insect fauna evolved in the absence of terrestrial mammalian predators for millions of years, resulting in the evolution of unique fauna like the large, flightless Orthopteran, the wētā. Here we investigate how experience with introduced mammalian predators might influence anti-predator behaviours by comparing behaviours in a group of Wellington tree wētā (

Identifiants

pubmed: 37215934
doi: 10.1016/j.cris.2023.100058
pii: S2666-5158(23)00007-0
pmc: PMC10199174
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100058

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 Nov;89(4):932-49
pubmed: 25319946
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2627-34
pubmed: 16321785
Am Nat. 2010 Mar;175(3):382-90
pubmed: 20109061
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 May;22(5):229-30; author reply 230-1
pubmed: 17300855
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1663-8
pubmed: 16087420
J Evol Biol. 2009 Mar;22(3):544-52
pubmed: 19210595
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Dec;21(12):674-80
pubmed: 16879896
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 17;8(12):e84641
pubmed: 24358369
Conserv Biol. 2013 Feb;27(1):74-82
pubmed: 23020670
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2018;72(2):22
pubmed: 29386702
J Comp Psychol. 2018 Nov;132(4):349-360
pubmed: 30451523
Am Nat. 1999 Jun;153(6):649-659
pubmed: 29585647
Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 27;10(23):13334-13344
pubmed: 33304541
Ecology. 2021 Jul;102(7):e03363
pubmed: 33830501
PeerJ. 2021 Mar 1;9:e10722
pubmed: 33717665

Auteurs

Meg Kelly (M)

Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Priscilla M Wehi (PM)

Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Sheri L Johnson (SL)

Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Classifications MeSH