Acceptability and Feasibility of a Patient-Oriented Music Intervention to Reduce Pain in the Intensive Care Unit: Protocol for a Crossover Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
acceptability
feasibility
intensive care unit
music
pain
pilot
Journal
JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 May 2023
10 May 2023
Historique:
received:
05
07
2022
accepted:
09
03
2023
revised:
20
02
2023
medline:
10
5
2023
pubmed:
10
5
2023
entrez:
10
5
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many patients experience pain in the intensive care unit (ICU) despite receiving pain medication. Research has shown that music can help reduce pain. Music interventions studied so far have not used music streaming to generate playlists based on patient preferences while incorporating recommended tempo and duration. Previous research has focused on postoperative ICU patients able to self-report, which is underrepresentative of the ICU population that might benefit from a music intervention for pain management. We developed a new patient-oriented music intervention (POMI) that incorporates features based on theoretical, empirical, and experiential data intended to be used in the ICU. Such a music intervention should consider the expertise of ICU patients, family members, and nursing staff, as well as the practicality of the intervention when used in practice. The primary objectives of this study are to (1) evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the POMI to reduce pain in ICU patients and (2) evaluate the feasibility of conducting a crossover pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) for intervention testing in the ICU. A secondary objective is to examine the preliminary efficacy of the POMI to reduce pain in ICU patients. A single-blind 2×2 crossover pilot RCT will be conducted. Patients will undergo 1 sequence of 2 interventions: the POMI which delivers music based on patients' preferences via headphones or music pillow for 20-30 minutes and the control intervention (headphones or pillow without music). The sequence of the interventions will be inverted with a 4-hour washout period. Timing of the interventions will be before a planned bed turning procedure. Each patient will undergo 1 session of music. Twenty-four patients will be recruited. Patients able to self-report (n=12), family members of patients unable to self-report (n=12), and nursing staff (n=12) involved in the bed turning procedure will be invited to complete a short questionnaire on the POMI acceptability. Data will be collected on the feasibility of the intervention delivery (ie, time spent creating a playlist, any issue related to headphones/pillow or music delivery, environmental noises, and intervention interruptions) and research methods (ie, number of patients screened, recruited, randomized, and included in the analysis). Pain scores will be obtained before and after intervention delivery. Recruitment and data collection began in March 2022. As of July 5, 2022, in total, 22 patients, 12 family members, and 11 nurses were recruited. Methodological limitations and strengths are discussed. Study limitations include the lack of blinding for patients able to self-report. Strengths include collecting data from various sources, getting a comprehensive evaluation of the intervention, and using a crossover pilot RCT design, where participants act as their own control, thus reducing confounding factors. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05320224; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05320224. DERR1-10.2196/40760.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Many patients experience pain in the intensive care unit (ICU) despite receiving pain medication. Research has shown that music can help reduce pain. Music interventions studied so far have not used music streaming to generate playlists based on patient preferences while incorporating recommended tempo and duration. Previous research has focused on postoperative ICU patients able to self-report, which is underrepresentative of the ICU population that might benefit from a music intervention for pain management. We developed a new patient-oriented music intervention (POMI) that incorporates features based on theoretical, empirical, and experiential data intended to be used in the ICU. Such a music intervention should consider the expertise of ICU patients, family members, and nursing staff, as well as the practicality of the intervention when used in practice.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The primary objectives of this study are to (1) evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the POMI to reduce pain in ICU patients and (2) evaluate the feasibility of conducting a crossover pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) for intervention testing in the ICU. A secondary objective is to examine the preliminary efficacy of the POMI to reduce pain in ICU patients.
METHODS
METHODS
A single-blind 2×2 crossover pilot RCT will be conducted. Patients will undergo 1 sequence of 2 interventions: the POMI which delivers music based on patients' preferences via headphones or music pillow for 20-30 minutes and the control intervention (headphones or pillow without music). The sequence of the interventions will be inverted with a 4-hour washout period. Timing of the interventions will be before a planned bed turning procedure. Each patient will undergo 1 session of music. Twenty-four patients will be recruited. Patients able to self-report (n=12), family members of patients unable to self-report (n=12), and nursing staff (n=12) involved in the bed turning procedure will be invited to complete a short questionnaire on the POMI acceptability. Data will be collected on the feasibility of the intervention delivery (ie, time spent creating a playlist, any issue related to headphones/pillow or music delivery, environmental noises, and intervention interruptions) and research methods (ie, number of patients screened, recruited, randomized, and included in the analysis). Pain scores will be obtained before and after intervention delivery.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Recruitment and data collection began in March 2022. As of July 5, 2022, in total, 22 patients, 12 family members, and 11 nurses were recruited.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Methodological limitations and strengths are discussed. Study limitations include the lack of blinding for patients able to self-report. Strengths include collecting data from various sources, getting a comprehensive evaluation of the intervention, and using a crossover pilot RCT design, where participants act as their own control, thus reducing confounding factors.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05320224; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05320224.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)
UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/40760.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37163350
pii: v12i1e40760
doi: 10.2196/40760
pmc: PMC10209788
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05320224']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e40760Informations de copyright
©Melissa Richard-Lalonde, Nancy Feeley, Sylvie Cossette, Linda L Chlan, Céline Gélinas. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 10.05.2023.
Références
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Mar;49(3):625-31
pubmed: 25555446
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Nov 20;3(4):e63
pubmed: 25487135
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:428731
pubmed: 24371459
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1493-1501
pubmed: 30128592
Heart Lung. 2015 Jan-Feb;44(1):45-9
pubmed: 25261939
Pain Manag Nurs. 2018 Apr;19(2):172-176
pubmed: 29153918
J Music Ther. 2016 Winter;53(4):430-477
pubmed: 27760797
Complement Ther Med. 2018 Dec;41:81-89
pubmed: 30477868
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):103-128
pubmed: 27984278
Pain Med. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):2556-2569
pubmed: 29618079
AORN J. 2008 Apr;87(4):780-807
pubmed: 18395022
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 18;10:153-157
pubmed: 29403314
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2019 Dec 15;30(4):398-410
pubmed: 31951660
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2019 Dec 15;30(4):365-387
pubmed: 31951666
Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2760-7
pubmed: 22890258
Pain Manag Nurs. 2018 Dec;19(6):671-692
pubmed: 29778755
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91
pubmed: 18183564
Integr Med Insights. 2017 Jul 20;12:1178633717716455
pubmed: 28904523
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873
pubmed: 30113379
Agri. 2010 Oct;22(4):145-50
pubmed: 21153932
Heart Lung. 2007 Nov-Dec;36(6):431-9
pubmed: 18005804
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD004843
pubmed: 16625614
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(6):867-78
pubmed: 23299258
Enferm Intensiva. 2013 Apr-Jun;24(2):63-71
pubmed: 23298702
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239
pubmed: 27777223
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Jan;26(1):30-8
pubmed: 17085009
Lancet. 2015 Oct 24;386(10004):1659-71
pubmed: 26277246
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;36(4):234-243
pubmed: 28570377
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jun;59(6):1304-1319.e6
pubmed: 31881291
Am J Crit Care. 2011 Mar;20(2):e28-40
pubmed: 21362711
Pain. 2014 Sep;155(9):1683-1695
pubmed: 24865794
Am J Crit Care. 1999 Nov;8(6):410-5
pubmed: 10553182
Res Nurs Health. 2009 Aug;32(4):419-31
pubmed: 19434647
Crit Care. 2021 Apr 13;25(1):142
pubmed: 33849619
Perspect Infirm. 2007 Mar-Apr;4(4):12-20
pubmed: 17479546
BMJ. 2019 Jul 31;366:l4378
pubmed: 31366597
Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):406-25
pubmed: 23107431
Int J Nurs Pract. 2010 Apr;16(2):125-31
pubmed: 20487057