Effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children and adolescents: a large-scale observational study.
COVID-19
Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine
Paediatric cohort
SARS-CoV-2
Vaccine effectiveness
mRNA vaccine
Journal
Lancet regional health. Americas
ISSN: 2667-193X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Reg Health Am
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918232503006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
10
03
2022
revised:
14
10
2022
accepted:
22
03
2023
medline:
8
5
2023
pubmed:
8
5
2023
entrez:
8
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Policymakers urgently need evidence to adequately balance the costs and benefits of mass vaccination against COVID-19 across all age groups, including children and adolescents. In this study, we aim to assess the effectiveness of CoronaVac's primary series among children and adolescents in Chile. We used a large prospective national cohort of about two million children and adolescents 6-16 years to estimate the effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in preventing laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19), hospitalisation, and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) associated with COVID-19. We compared the risk of individuals treated with a complete primary immunization schedule (two doses, 28 days apart) with the risk of unvaccinated individuals during the follow-up period. The study was conducted in Chile from June 27, 2021, to January 12, 2022, when the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant was predominant but other variants of concern were co-circulating, including Omicron. We used inverse probability-weighted survival regression models to estimate hazard ratios of complete immunization over the unvaccinated status, accounting for time-varying vaccination exposure and adjusting for relevant demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical confounders. The estimated adjusted vaccine effectiveness for the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children aged 6-16 years was 74.5% (95% CI, 73.8-75.2), 91.0% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4), 93.8% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4) for the prevention of COVID-19, hospitalisation, and ICU admission, respectively. For the subgroup of children 6-11 years, the vaccine effectiveness was 75.8% (95% CI, 74.7-76.8) for the prevention of COVID-19 and 77.9% (95% CI, 61.5-87.3) for the prevention of hospitalisation. Our results suggest that a complete primary immunization schedule with the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine provides effective protection against severe COVID-19 disease for children 6-16 years. Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) Millennium Science Initiative Program and Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (FONDAP).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Policymakers urgently need evidence to adequately balance the costs and benefits of mass vaccination against COVID-19 across all age groups, including children and adolescents. In this study, we aim to assess the effectiveness of CoronaVac's primary series among children and adolescents in Chile.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We used a large prospective national cohort of about two million children and adolescents 6-16 years to estimate the effectiveness of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in preventing laboratory-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19), hospitalisation, and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) associated with COVID-19. We compared the risk of individuals treated with a complete primary immunization schedule (two doses, 28 days apart) with the risk of unvaccinated individuals during the follow-up period. The study was conducted in Chile from June 27, 2021, to January 12, 2022, when the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant was predominant but other variants of concern were co-circulating, including Omicron. We used inverse probability-weighted survival regression models to estimate hazard ratios of complete immunization over the unvaccinated status, accounting for time-varying vaccination exposure and adjusting for relevant demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical confounders.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
The estimated adjusted vaccine effectiveness for the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children aged 6-16 years was 74.5% (95% CI, 73.8-75.2), 91.0% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4), 93.8% (95% CI, 87.8-93.4) for the prevention of COVID-19, hospitalisation, and ICU admission, respectively. For the subgroup of children 6-11 years, the vaccine effectiveness was 75.8% (95% CI, 74.7-76.8) for the prevention of COVID-19 and 77.9% (95% CI, 61.5-87.3) for the prevention of hospitalisation.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
Our results suggest that a complete primary immunization schedule with the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine provides effective protection against severe COVID-19 disease for children 6-16 years.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (ANID) Millennium Science Initiative Program and Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias (FONDAP).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37155483
doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100487
pii: S2667-193X(23)00061-3
pmc: PMC10117174
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100487Informations de copyright
© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
R. Araos has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Pfizer and research support from Sinovac. This support is not related to this article and was received after its acceptance. J.C. Flores is a non-paid member of the Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Sur Oriente's Ethics Committee, Santiago, Chile. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 23;383(4):334-346
pubmed: 32598831
N Engl J Med. 2022 May 19;386(20):1899-1909
pubmed: 35353976
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Dec 31;70(5152):1755-1760
pubmed: 34968370
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 24;386(8):713-723
pubmed: 35021004
N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 11;387(6):525-532
pubmed: 35857701
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 2;385(10):875-884
pubmed: 34233097
Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7931):246-248
pubmed: 36220929
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534
pubmed: 32087114
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Dec 1;40(12):e482-e487
pubmed: 34870392
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Sep;13:100316
pubmed: 35872665
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Sep;6(9):614-623
pubmed: 35752194
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Nov;39(11):e340-e346
pubmed: 32925547
Lancet. 2022 Jul 9;400(10346):97-103
pubmed: 35780801
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 21;387(3):227-236
pubmed: 35767475
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 29;16(1):e0246326
pubmed: 33513204
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;122:266-275
pubmed: 35562045
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Dec 31;70(5152):1761-1765
pubmed: 34968373
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2028786
pubmed: 33180132
Nat Med. 2022 Jul;28(7):1377-1380
pubmed: 35605637
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 14;71(2):52-58
pubmed: 35025852
Nature. 2021 Oct;598(7881):398-399
pubmed: 34650240
Arch Pediatr. 2021 Apr;28(3):242-248
pubmed: 33483192
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 May;56(5):837-848
pubmed: 33428826
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:246-256
pubmed: 33227520
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Sep 15;168(6):656-64
pubmed: 18682488
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2022 Mar 25;21(1):14
pubmed: 35337354
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 6;386(1):35-46
pubmed: 34752019
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):e276-e288
pubmed: 32818434
Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):550-60
pubmed: 10955408
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Mar;107(3):e1
pubmed: 34732388
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Dec 17;:
pubmed: 33334728
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;21(12):1645-1653
pubmed: 34197764
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Sep;4(9):653-661
pubmed: 32593339
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;22(2):196-208
pubmed: 34536349
J Pediatr. 2021 Mar;230:23-31.e10
pubmed: 33197493
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Sep 01;174(9):882-889
pubmed: 32320004