Health-related quality of life in patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease.

EORTC QLQ-C30 EQ-5D-5L FACT-BMT graft-versus-host disease health-related quality of life patient-reported outcomes

Journal

European journal of haematology
ISSN: 1600-0609
Titre abrégé: Eur J Haematol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8703985

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
revised: 20 04 2023
received: 25 01 2023
accepted: 21 04 2023
medline: 19 7 2023
pubmed: 4 5 2023
entrez: 3 5 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Evidence regarding health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD) is lacking. Evaluating HRQoL was a secondary objective of the HOVON 113 MSC trial. Here we describe the outcomes of the EQ-5D-5L, EORTC QLQ-C30, and FACT-BMT for all adult patients who completed these questionnaires at baseline (i.e., before the start of treatment; n = 26). Descriptive statistics were used to describe baseline patient and disease characteristics, EQ-5D dimension scores and values, EQ VAS scores, EORTC QLQ-C30 scale/item and summary scores, and FACT-BMT subscale and total scores. The mean EQ-5D value was 0.36. In total, 96% of the patients reported problems with usual activities, 92% with pain/discomfort, 84% with mobility, 80% with self-care, and 72% with anxiety/depression. The mean EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score was 43.50. Mean scale/item scores ranged from 21.79 to 60.00 for functioning scales, from 39.74 to 75.21 for symptom scales, and from 5.33 to 91.67 for single items. The mean FACT-BMT total score was 75.31. Mean subscale scores ranged from 10.09 for physical well-being to 23.94 for social/family well-being. Our study showed that HRQoL in patients with SR-aGvHD is poor. Improving HRQoL and symptom management in these patients should be a top priority.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Evidence regarding health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD) is lacking. Evaluating HRQoL was a secondary objective of the HOVON 113 MSC trial. Here we describe the outcomes of the EQ-5D-5L, EORTC QLQ-C30, and FACT-BMT for all adult patients who completed these questionnaires at baseline (i.e., before the start of treatment; n = 26).
METHODS METHODS
Descriptive statistics were used to describe baseline patient and disease characteristics, EQ-5D dimension scores and values, EQ VAS scores, EORTC QLQ-C30 scale/item and summary scores, and FACT-BMT subscale and total scores.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean EQ-5D value was 0.36. In total, 96% of the patients reported problems with usual activities, 92% with pain/discomfort, 84% with mobility, 80% with self-care, and 72% with anxiety/depression. The mean EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score was 43.50. Mean scale/item scores ranged from 21.79 to 60.00 for functioning scales, from 39.74 to 75.21 for symptom scales, and from 5.33 to 91.67 for single items. The mean FACT-BMT total score was 75.31. Mean subscale scores ranged from 10.09 for physical well-being to 23.94 for social/family well-being.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our study showed that HRQoL in patients with SR-aGvHD is poor. Improving HRQoL and symptom management in these patients should be a top priority.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37137484
doi: 10.1111/ejh.13987
doi:

Substances chimiques

Steroids 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

240-246

Subventions

Organisme : European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program
ID : 643580
Organisme : Dutch Cancer Society

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Zeiser R, Blazar BR. Acute graft-versus-host disease: biologic process, prevention, and therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(22):2167-2179. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1609337
Couriel D, Caldera H, Champlin R, Komanduri K. Acute graft-versus-host disease: pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Cancer. 2004;101(9):1936-1946. doi:10.1002/cncr.20613
MacMillan ML, Robin M, Harris AC, et al. A refined risk score for acute graft-versus-host disease that predicts response to initial therapy, survival, and transplant-related mortality. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(4):761-767. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.01.001
Westin JR, Saliba RM, De Lima M, et al. Steroid-refractory acute GVHD: predictors and outcomes. Adv Hematol. 2011;2011:e601953. doi:10.1155/2011/601953
Martin PJ, Rizzo JD, Wingard JR, et al. First- and second-line systemic treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: recommendations of the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(8):1150-1163. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.04.005
Malard F, Huang XJ, Sim JPY. Treatment and unmet needs in steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease. Leukemia. 2020;34(5):1229-1240. doi:10.1038/s41375-020-0804-2
Martin PJ. How I treat steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2020;135(19):1630-1638. doi:10.1182/blood.2019000960
Patel SS, Lapin B, Majhail NS, Hamilton BK. Patient-reported outcomes in acute graft-versus-host disease: optimizing patient care and clinical trial endpoints. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020;55(8):1533-1539. doi:10.1038/s41409-020-0850-4
Kilgour JM, Wali G, Gibbons E, et al. Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26(5):e113-e127. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.01.022
Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LDV, Aaronson NK. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(23):3027-3034. doi:10.1001/jama.288.23.3027
HOVON. HOVON 113 MSC. Accessed November 25, 2021. https://hovon.nl/en/trials/ho113
EU Clinical Trials Register. Protocol HO113. Accessed September 5, 2022. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2012-004915-30/BE
CORDIS EU. Restoring tissue regeneration in patients with visceral graft versus host disease. Accessed September 5, 2022. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/643580
Devlin N, Parkin D, Janssen B. Methods for Analysing and Reporting EQ-5D Data. Springer; 2020.
EORTC. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual; 2001. Accessed December 22, 2021. https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
FACIT. FACT-BMT. Accessed December 22, 2021. https://www.facit.org/measures/FACT-BMT
van Wilder L, Charafeddine R, Beutels P, et al. Belgian population norms for the EQ-5D-5L, 2018. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(2):527-537. doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02971-6
Grochtdreis T, Dams J, König HH, Konnopka A. Health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-5L: estimation of normative index values based on a representative German population sample and value set. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(6):933-944. doi:10.1007/s10198-019-01054-1
Garcia-Gordillo MA, Adsuar JC, Olivares PR. Normative values of EQ-5D-5L: in a Spanish representative population sample from Spanish Health Survey, 2011. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(5):1313-1321. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1164-7
Versteegh MM, Vermeulen KM, Evers SMAA, de Wit GA, Prenger R, Stolk EA. Dutch tariff for the five-level version of EQ-5D. Value Health. 2016;19(4):343-352. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003
EORTC. Scoring of the QLQ-C30 Summary Score; 2018. Accessed December 22, 2021. https://qol.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/scoring_of_the_qlq-c30_summary_score.pdf
Giesinger JM, Kieffer JM, Fayers PM, et al. Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:79-88. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.007
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. StataCorp; 2019.
Luckett T, King MT, Butow PN, et al. Choosing between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G for measuring health-related quality of life in cancer clinical research: issues, evidence and recommendations. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(10):2179-2190. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq721
Kopp M, Schweigkofler H, Holzner B, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-BMT for the measurement of quality of life in bone marrow transplant recipients: a comparison. Eur J Haematol. 2000;65(2):97-103. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0609.2000.90143.x
Nolte S, Liegl G, Petersen MA, et al. General population normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 health-related quality of life questionnaire based on 15,386 persons across 13 European countries, Canada and the Unites States. Eur J Cancer. 2019;107:153-163. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.024
Golicki D, Jaśkowiak K, Wójcik A, et al. EQ-5D-derived health state utility values in hematologic malignancies: a catalog of 796 utilities based on a systematic review. Value Health. 2020;23(7):953-968. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1825
Kurosawa S, Yamaguchi T, Mori T, et al. Patient-reported quality of life after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation or chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015;50(9):1241-1249. doi:10.1038/bmt.2015.137

Auteurs

Brenda Leeneman (B)

Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Hedwig M Blommestein (HM)

Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Annemieke van Dongen-Leunis (A)

Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Mattia Algeri (M)

Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Willem E Fibbe (WE)

Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Liesbeth Oosten (L)

Department of Hematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Carin A Uyl-de Groot (CA)

Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Frederick W Thielen (FW)

Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH