Reliability of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1 for excluding clinically significant prostate cancer using a 1.5 tesla scanner.
Clinically significant prostate cancer
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
PI-RADS score
Trans perineal prostate biopsy
Journal
BMC urology
ISSN: 1471-2490
Titre abrégé: BMC Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2023
28 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
26
11
2022
accepted:
10
04
2023
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
29
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate gland is now the recommended initial investigation of choice for the detection of Prostate cancer (PCa). It effectively identifies patients who require prostate biopsies due to the risk of clinically significant PCa. It helps patients with clinically insignificant PCa avoid the invasive biopsies and possible accompanying complications. Large clinical trials have investigated the accuracy of mpMRI in detecting PCa. We performed a local review to examine the reliability of omitting tissue sampling in men with a negative (PIRADS 2 (P2) or less) mpMRI in the primary diagnostic setting. This was a retrospective study of patients with clinical suspicion of PCa within a 2-year period. Patients had a mpMRI prior to having trans-perineal prostate gland biopsies. Clinically significant disease was defined as Gleason 7 and above. The descriptive data was analysed using contingency table methods. A p-value less than 0.05 was statistically significant. Out of 700 patients 90 had an mpMRI score of PIRADS 2. Seventy-seven (85.5%) of these patients had a negative biopsy, 9(10%) showed Gleason 6, 4 patients showed Gleason 7 or above. 78 patients with PIRADS 2 had a PSA density of < 0.15, none of which had a clinically significant biopsy result. The negative predictive value of mpMRI from this study is 95%. Our results are in line with negative predictive values demonstrated in the current literature. This local study, likely applicable to other district general hospitals, shows that mpMRI is a safe and reliable initial investigation to aid decisions on which patients require biopsies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37118694
doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01241-6
pii: 10.1186/s12894-023-01241-6
pmc: PMC10148493
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
69Informations de copyright
© 2023. Crown.
Références
BJU Int. 2011 May;107(9):1411-8
pubmed: 21044250
Radiographics. 1995 Jul;15(4):813-29; discussion 829-32
pubmed: 7569131
Eur Radiol. 2014 Jun;24(6):1349-56
pubmed: 24687527
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):741-50
pubmed: 26098458
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
Radiology. 2010 Apr;255(1):89-99
pubmed: 20308447
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351
pubmed: 30898406
BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124(5):775-784
pubmed: 31237388
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Feb;202(2):343-51
pubmed: 24450675
J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1613-1618
pubmed: 27320841
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
Acad Radiol. 2001 Feb;8(2):149-57
pubmed: 11227643
Radiology. 2014 May;271(2):435-44
pubmed: 24484061
BJU Int. 2019 Jul;124(1):9-26
pubmed: 31206997
Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jan;38(1):59-85, viii
pubmed: 10664667
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1110-4
pubmed: 22244150
Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-57
pubmed: 22322308
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4:CD012663
pubmed: 31022301
Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):402-414
pubmed: 32444265
J Urol. 2019 Jun;201(6):1121-1126
pubmed: 30835607
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1045-53
pubmed: 25656808
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 May-Jun;45(3):486-494
pubmed: 31038866
Heliyon. 2021 Nov 06;7(11):e08325
pubmed: 34820539
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Nov-Dec;42(6):1081-1090
pubmed: 27622278