Digital literacy level and associated factors among health professionals in a referral and teaching hospital: An implication for future digital health systems implementation.
Northwest Ethiopia
associated factors
digital health systems
digital literacy
health professionals
referral and teaching hospital
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
23
12
2022
accepted:
15
03
2023
medline:
1
5
2023
pubmed:
28
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In Ethiopia and other developing countries, electronic medical record systems and other health information technology are being introduced. However, a small proportion of low-income countries have successfully implemented national health information systems. One cause for this can be the lack of digital literacy among medical practitioners. As a result, this study aimed to assess health professionals' digital literacy level and associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia. A quantitative cross-sectional study was employed among 423 health professionals working in a teaching and referral hospital in Northwest Ethiopia. We modified and applied the European commission's framework for digital competency to assess the level of digital literacy among health professionals. We used stratified random sampling with proportional allocation to the size of the departments in the hospital to select study participants. Data were collected using a semi-structured, self-administered, and pretested questionnaire. Descriptive and binary logistic regression analysis techniques were used to describe respondents' digital literacy level and identify its associated factor, respectively. The odds ratio with 95% CI and value of p were used to assess the strength of the association and statistical significance, respectively. Out of 411 participants, 51.8% (95% CI, 46.9-56.6%) of health professionals had adequate digital literacy. Holding a master's degree (Adjusted OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.18-3.85), access to digital technology (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.12-3.17), having training in digital technology (AOR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.05-2.59), and having a positive attitude towards digital health technology (AOR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.02-2.68) were found to be significant factors associated with health professionals digital literacy level of health professionals. Low level of digital literacy among health professionals was observed, with nearly half (48.2%) of them having poor digital literacy levels. Access to digital technology, training on digital technology, and attitude toward digital health technology were significant factors associated with digital literacy. It is suggested to increase computer accessibility, provide a training program on digital health technology, and promote a positive attitude toward this technology to improve the deployment of health information systems.
Sections du résumé
Background
In Ethiopia and other developing countries, electronic medical record systems and other health information technology are being introduced. However, a small proportion of low-income countries have successfully implemented national health information systems. One cause for this can be the lack of digital literacy among medical practitioners. As a result, this study aimed to assess health professionals' digital literacy level and associated factors in Northwest Ethiopia.
Method
A quantitative cross-sectional study was employed among 423 health professionals working in a teaching and referral hospital in Northwest Ethiopia. We modified and applied the European commission's framework for digital competency to assess the level of digital literacy among health professionals. We used stratified random sampling with proportional allocation to the size of the departments in the hospital to select study participants. Data were collected using a semi-structured, self-administered, and pretested questionnaire. Descriptive and binary logistic regression analysis techniques were used to describe respondents' digital literacy level and identify its associated factor, respectively. The odds ratio with 95% CI and value of p were used to assess the strength of the association and statistical significance, respectively.
Results
Out of 411 participants, 51.8% (95% CI, 46.9-56.6%) of health professionals had adequate digital literacy. Holding a master's degree (Adjusted OR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.18-3.85), access to digital technology (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.12-3.17), having training in digital technology (AOR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.05-2.59), and having a positive attitude towards digital health technology (AOR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.02-2.68) were found to be significant factors associated with health professionals digital literacy level of health professionals.
Conclusion
Low level of digital literacy among health professionals was observed, with nearly half (48.2%) of them having poor digital literacy levels. Access to digital technology, training on digital technology, and attitude toward digital health technology were significant factors associated with digital literacy. It is suggested to increase computer accessibility, provide a training program on digital health technology, and promote a positive attitude toward this technology to improve the deployment of health information systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37113180
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130894
pmc: PMC10126829
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1130894Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Tegegne, Tilahun, Mamuye, Kerie, Nurhussien, Zemen, Mebratu, Sisay, Getachew, Gebeyehu, Seyoum, Tesfaye and Yilma.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 12;14:115
pubmed: 25495757
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2011 Aug;42(8):365-70
pubmed: 21366161
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Feb 23;9:15
pubmed: 19236705
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jun;114:114-120
pubmed: 29126701
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Mar 20;6:106
pubmed: 23514191
J Infect Public Health. 2016 Nov - Dec;9(6):774-780
pubmed: 27686258
Health Technol (Berl). 2021;11(2):359-366
pubmed: 33469474
Acta Inform Med. 2014 Apr;22(2):133-8
pubmed: 24825941
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1021
pubmed: 33168002
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 May 1;90(5):365-72
pubmed: 22589570
Acta Inform Med. 2013;21(2):129-34
pubmed: 24058254
BMC Proc. 2018 Aug 15;12(Suppl 11):17
pubmed: 30540290
JMIR Med Educ. 2021 Feb 19;7(1):e18590
pubmed: 33605896
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1628-38
pubmed: 19321858
Pharmacy (Basel). 2015 Oct 15;3(4):182-196
pubmed: 28975912
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Mar 07;38:240
pubmed: 34046143
JMIR Hum Factors. 2015 Mar 26;2(1):e4
pubmed: 27025996
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 30;14:96
pubmed: 24479696
Inform Health Soc Care. 2021 Mar 2;46(1):68-83
pubmed: 33251894
Yearb Med Inform. 2013;8:28-33
pubmed: 23974545
Front Digit Health. 2021 Sep 27;3:739476
pubmed: 34713205
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;10:900293
pubmed: 35784221
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2368-2369
pubmed: 27898974
Inform Health Soc Care. 2014 Jan;39(1):15-32
pubmed: 24131449
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:232-6
pubmed: 21346975
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;1(7):743-744
pubmed: 27580275
Health Inf Manag. 2010;39(1):17-26
pubmed: 20335646
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253691
pubmed: 34197506
Health Informatics J. 2020 Mar;26(1):592-612
pubmed: 30983476
BMC Proc. 2020 Jul 23;14(Suppl 10):9
pubmed: 32714444
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jul;33(7):1254-61
pubmed: 25006154