Effect of Different Scaling Methods on the Surface Topography of Different CAD/CAM Ceramic Compositions.
CAD/CAM
ceramics
dental scaling
surface roughness
ultrasonics
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Apr 2023
08 Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
16
02
2023
revised:
25
03
2023
accepted:
03
04
2023
medline:
28
4
2023
pubmed:
28
4
2023
entrez:
28
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study evaluated the effect of ultrasonic and manual scaling using different scaler materials on the surface topography of computer-aided designing and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic compositions. After scaling with manual and ultrasonic scalers, the surface properties of four classes of CAD/CAM ceramic discs: lithium disilicate (IPE), leucite-reinforced (IPS), advanced lithium disilicate (CT), and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (CD) of 1.5 mm thickness were evaluated. Surface roughness was measured before and after treatment, and scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate the surface topography following the performed scaling procedures. Two-way ANOVA was conducted to assess the association of the ceramic material and scaling method with the surface roughness. There was a significant difference in the surface roughness between the ceramic materials subjected to different scaling methods (
Identifiants
pubmed: 37109810
pii: ma16082974
doi: 10.3390/ma16082974
pmc: PMC10143924
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Dent Mater J. 2022 Apr 1;41(2):295-301
pubmed: 35095042
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Apr;119(4):593-599
pubmed: 28781072
J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Jan;147(1):67-74
pubmed: 26743797
Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 Aug;14(3):184-90
pubmed: 25690687
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e259-e264
pubmed: 29044828
J Dent. 1991 Aug;19(4):226-9
pubmed: 1787211
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203849
pubmed: 30212528
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Sep;30(5):434-441
pubmed: 29920916
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;9(3):188-194
pubmed: 28680550
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Nov-Dec;18(6):710-7
pubmed: 25624626
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1265-70
pubmed: 24831748
Oper Dent. 2006 Sep-Oct;31(5):577-83
pubmed: 17024946
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jun;127(6):925.e1-925.e8
pubmed: 35469648
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):516-523
pubmed: 31309930
Int J Dent Hyg. 2007 Feb;5(1):2-12
pubmed: 17250573
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jan 09;16(2):
pubmed: 36676383
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jul-Aug;27(4):801-10
pubmed: 22848881
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Aug;41(4):419-28
pubmed: 24552131
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jul;128(1):79-88
pubmed: 33546857
J Adv Prosthodont. 2021 Oct;13(5):281-291
pubmed: 34777718
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 03;15(11):
pubmed: 35683294
Int J Biomater. 2022 Feb 2;2022:5896511
pubmed: 35154328
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jul;128(1):73-78
pubmed: 33546860
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Sep 30;14(19):
pubmed: 36236050
J Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;26(2):129-135
pubmed: 26683122
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Jun;5(3):13-9
pubmed: 24155597
J Periodontol. 2013 Aug;84(8):1191-8
pubmed: 23075432
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Nov 12;29(6):450-458
pubmed: 28891600
Case Rep Dent. 2022 Sep 16;2022:6872542
pubmed: 36157203
J Dent. 2021 Jun;109:103661
pubmed: 33864886
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Aug;128(2):216.e1-216.e8
pubmed: 35788273
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Jan-Feb;27(1):4-30
pubmed: 36873963
Biology (Basel). 2021 Nov 12;10(11):
pubmed: 34827163
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 20;14(10):
pubmed: 34065202
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Mar;35(2):390-396
pubmed: 36057856
J Prosthodont. 2022 Jul;31(6):521-528
pubmed: 34661950
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):
pubmed: 34948965
Int J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb 22;35(6):770–776
pubmed: 35234750
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 21;15(1):
pubmed: 35009166