The predictive role of hope and social relational quality in disability acceptance among Iranian patients under hemodialysis.
Communication
Disability acceptance
Hemodialysis
Hope
Journal
BMC nephrology
ISSN: 1471-2369
Titre abrégé: BMC Nephrol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967793
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 04 2023
20 04 2023
Historique:
received:
20
08
2022
accepted:
10
04
2023
medline:
24
4
2023
pubmed:
21
4
2023
entrez:
20
04
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients undergoing hemodialysis face disabilities that its acceptance may influenced by several factors. This study aimed to determine the predictive role of hope and quality of social relationship on accepting disability amongst patients undergoing hemodialysis. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 120 hemodialysis patients referred to hemodialysis centers in Nemazi and Shahid Faghihi hospitals and Imam Reza Clinic in Shiraz. Snyder Hope Scale, Acceptance of Disability Scale (ADS), and Social Relational Quality Scale (SRQS) were used for data collection. The data were analyzed through the Smart PLS-3 and SPSS software using Pearson's correlation and multiple linear regression analysis tests, and confirmatory factor analysis. Face, content, and construct validities and internal consistency of the Persian version of ADS and SRQS were confirmed. The patients' mean score of hope was 38.83 (SD = 4.35), which was not desirable. Their mean score of SRQS was 45.45 (SD = 3.87), which was at the moderate level. Nonetheless, the mean score of disability acceptance (66.01 (SD = 7.15)) was lower than expected. The results showed disability acceptance was associated with having good level of hope (β = 0.44, p = 0.002) and social relationship (β = 0.31, p = 0.04). Hope and social relational quality predicted the acceptance of disabilities. Therefore, designing interventions to promote hope and social relationship in hemodialysis patients may increase their disability acceptance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients undergoing hemodialysis face disabilities that its acceptance may influenced by several factors. This study aimed to determine the predictive role of hope and quality of social relationship on accepting disability amongst patients undergoing hemodialysis.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study was conducted on 120 hemodialysis patients referred to hemodialysis centers in Nemazi and Shahid Faghihi hospitals and Imam Reza Clinic in Shiraz. Snyder Hope Scale, Acceptance of Disability Scale (ADS), and Social Relational Quality Scale (SRQS) were used for data collection. The data were analyzed through the Smart PLS-3 and SPSS software using Pearson's correlation and multiple linear regression analysis tests, and confirmatory factor analysis.
RESULTS
Face, content, and construct validities and internal consistency of the Persian version of ADS and SRQS were confirmed. The patients' mean score of hope was 38.83 (SD = 4.35), which was not desirable. Their mean score of SRQS was 45.45 (SD = 3.87), which was at the moderate level. Nonetheless, the mean score of disability acceptance (66.01 (SD = 7.15)) was lower than expected. The results showed disability acceptance was associated with having good level of hope (β = 0.44, p = 0.002) and social relationship (β = 0.31, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
Hope and social relational quality predicted the acceptance of disabilities. Therefore, designing interventions to promote hope and social relationship in hemodialysis patients may increase their disability acceptance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37081400
doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03161-x
pii: 10.1186/s12882-023-03161-x
pmc: PMC10116709
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Psychooncology. 2009 Oct;18(10):1097-105
pubmed: 19090528
Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):4099-4108
pubmed: 35072790
BMC Nephrol. 2015 Dec 05;16:202
pubmed: 26637344
Indian J Palliat Care. 2018 Jan-Mar;24(1):104-111
pubmed: 29440817
Spinal Cord. 2020 Dec;58(12):1317-1324
pubmed: 32606359
Rehabil Psychol. 2020 Aug;65(3):291-298
pubmed: 32804533
J Relig Health. 2020 Oct;59(5):2414-2429
pubmed: 31993921
J Relig Health. 2018 Jun;57(3):938-950
pubmed: 28770520
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):298-303
pubmed: 28126707
Br J Nurs. 2020 Nov 26;29(21):1260-1265
pubmed: 33242282
Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2021 Apr;38(2):127-135
pubmed: 33053615
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 10;9(6):
pubmed: 32531965
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Jul 1;33(7):1235-1244
pubmed: 29370430
Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Sep;40(3):220-226
pubmed: 28445326
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2017 May-Jun;22(3):190-194
pubmed: 28706542
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):321-35
pubmed: 8636885
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2020 Mar 13;13:37-44
pubmed: 32214839
Malays J Med Sci. 2020 May;27(3):75-83
pubmed: 32684808
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2020 Jun 26;13:163-169
pubmed: 32617015
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Jan 02;18(1):2
pubmed: 29291728
J Soc Psychol. 1998 Feb;138(1):13-25
pubmed: 9517309
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Nov 26;19(1):338
pubmed: 30477440
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 18;8:767215
pubmed: 35118084
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):
pubmed: 35409553
Spinal Cord. 2019 Apr;57(4):301-307
pubmed: 30374064
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Dec;43(12):1118-1124
pubmed: 33678069
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 20;34(7):486-491
pubmed: 30060352
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;18(24):
pubmed: 34948845
Med Care. 2014 Jan;52(1):63-70
pubmed: 24300025
BMC Neurol. 2013 Nov 14;13:175
pubmed: 24224953