Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years.

Degenerative disc disease Disc herniation Recurrent herniation Spinal instability

Journal

Surgical neurology international
ISSN: 2229-5097
Titre abrégé: Surg Neurol Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101535836

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 17 02 2023
accepted: 06 03 2023
medline: 8 4 2023
entrez: 7 4 2023
pubmed: 8 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recurrent disc herniations remain a challenge in spinal surgery. Although some authors recommend a repeat discectomy, others offer more invasive secondary fusions. Here, we reviewed the literature (2017-2022) regarding the safety/efficacy of treating recurrent disc herniations with repeated discectomy alone. Our literature search of recurrent lumbar disc herniations included; Medline, PubMed, Google scholar, and the Cochrane database. We focused on the types of discectomy performed, perioperative morbidity, costs, length of surgery, pain scores, and incidence of secondary dural tears. We identified 769 cases that included 126 microdiscectomies, and 643 endoscopic discectomies. Rates of disc recurrence ranged from 1% to 25% with accompanying secondary durotomy varying from 2% to 15%. In addition, operative times were relatively short, ranging from 29.2 min to 125 min, with a relatively small average estimated blood loss (i.e., minimal to maximally 150 mls). Repeated discectomy was the most commonly performed treatment for same-level recurrent disc herniations. Despite minimal intraoperative blood loss and short operating times, there was a significant risk of durotomy. Notably, patients must be informed that more extensive bone removal for treating recurrent disc increases the risk for instability warranting subsequent fusion.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Recurrent disc herniations remain a challenge in spinal surgery. Although some authors recommend a repeat discectomy, others offer more invasive secondary fusions. Here, we reviewed the literature (2017-2022) regarding the safety/efficacy of treating recurrent disc herniations with repeated discectomy alone.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Our literature search of recurrent lumbar disc herniations included; Medline, PubMed, Google scholar, and the Cochrane database. We focused on the types of discectomy performed, perioperative morbidity, costs, length of surgery, pain scores, and incidence of secondary dural tears.
Results UNASSIGNED
We identified 769 cases that included 126 microdiscectomies, and 643 endoscopic discectomies. Rates of disc recurrence ranged from 1% to 25% with accompanying secondary durotomy varying from 2% to 15%. In addition, operative times were relatively short, ranging from 29.2 min to 125 min, with a relatively small average estimated blood loss (i.e., minimal to maximally 150 mls).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Repeated discectomy was the most commonly performed treatment for same-level recurrent disc herniations. Despite minimal intraoperative blood loss and short operating times, there was a significant risk of durotomy. Notably, patients must be informed that more extensive bone removal for treating recurrent disc increases the risk for instability warranting subsequent fusion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37025530
doi: 10.25259/SNI_168_2023
pii: 10.25259/SNI_168_2023
pmc: PMC10070263
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

100

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;79(6):447-452
pubmed: 29241269
World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:89-95
pubmed: 27919762
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2020 Nov 20;5(4):272-277
pubmed: 34435151
J Spine Surg. 2020 Jun;6(2):483-494
pubmed: 32656386
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Dec 08;16:1185-1193
pubmed: 33363376
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Nov 23;15(1):557
pubmed: 33228753
World Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;100:641-647.e1
pubmed: 28153616
Surg Neurol Int. 2020 Nov 25;11:404
pubmed: 33365167
Global Spine J. 2022 Sep 22;:21925682221127997
pubmed: 36134544
Turk Neurosurg. 2020;30(1):112-118
pubmed: 31573066

Auteurs

Gerald Musa (G)

Department of Neurological Diseases and Neurosurgery, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.

Rossi E C Barrientos (REC)

Department of Neurological Diseases and Neurosurgery, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.

Serik K Makirov (SK)

Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Spinal Surgery, Scientific and Technical Center, Family Clinic, Moscow, Russia.

Gennady E Chmutin (GE)

Department of Neurological Diseases and Neurosurgery, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.

Gennady I Antonov (GI)

3 Central Military Clinical Hospital named after A.A Vishnevsky, of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.

Alexander V Kim (AV)

Department of Neurosurgery, City Clinical Hospital 68 Named after Demihov, Moscow, Russia.

Olzhas Otarov (O)

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Scientific and Technical Center, Family Clinic, Moscow, Russia.

Classifications MeSH