Breathe-squeeze: pharmacodynamics of a stimulus-free behavioural paradigm to track conscious states during sedation

EEG consciousness dexmedetomidine monitor responsiveness sedation sensory disconnection sleep

Journal

British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1471-6771
Titre abrégé: Br J Anaesth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2023
Historique:
received: 31 07 2022
revised: 03 01 2023
accepted: 16 01 2023
medline: 14 4 2023
pubmed: 27 3 2023
entrez: 26 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Conscious states are typically inferred through responses to auditory tasks and noxious stimulation. We report the use of a stimulus-free behavioural paradigm to track state transitions in responsiveness during dexmedetomidine sedation. We hypothesised that estimated dexmedetomidine effect-site (Ce) concentrations would be higher at loss of responsiveness (LOR) compared with return of responsiveness (ROR), and both would be lower than comparable studies that used stimulus-based assessments. Closed-Loop Acoustic Stimulation during Sedation with Dexmedetomidine data were analysed for secondary analysis. Fourteen healthy volunteers were asked to perform the breathe-squeeze task of gripping a dynamometer when inspiring and releasing it when expiring. LOR was defined as five inspirations without accompanied squeezes; ROR was defined as the return of five inspirations accompanied by squeezes. Brain states were monitored using 64-channel EEG. Dexmedetomidine was administered as a target-controlled infusion, with Ce estimated from a pharmacokinetic model. Counter to our hypothesis, mean estimated dexmedetomidine Ce was lower at LOR (0.92 ng ml The breathe-squeeze task can effectively track changes in responsiveness during sedation without external stimuli and might be more sensitive to state changes than stimulus-based tasks. It should be considered when perturbation of brain states is undesirable. NCT04206059.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Conscious states are typically inferred through responses to auditory tasks and noxious stimulation. We report the use of a stimulus-free behavioural paradigm to track state transitions in responsiveness during dexmedetomidine sedation. We hypothesised that estimated dexmedetomidine effect-site (Ce) concentrations would be higher at loss of responsiveness (LOR) compared with return of responsiveness (ROR), and both would be lower than comparable studies that used stimulus-based assessments.
METHODS
Closed-Loop Acoustic Stimulation during Sedation with Dexmedetomidine data were analysed for secondary analysis. Fourteen healthy volunteers were asked to perform the breathe-squeeze task of gripping a dynamometer when inspiring and releasing it when expiring. LOR was defined as five inspirations without accompanied squeezes; ROR was defined as the return of five inspirations accompanied by squeezes. Brain states were monitored using 64-channel EEG. Dexmedetomidine was administered as a target-controlled infusion, with Ce estimated from a pharmacokinetic model.
RESULTS
Counter to our hypothesis, mean estimated dexmedetomidine Ce was lower at LOR (0.92 ng ml
CONCLUSIONS
The breathe-squeeze task can effectively track changes in responsiveness during sedation without external stimuli and might be more sensitive to state changes than stimulus-based tasks. It should be considered when perturbation of brain states is undesirable.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT04206059.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36967282
pii: S0007-0912(23)00030-2
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.021
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dexmedetomidine 67VB76HONO
Hypnotics and Sedatives 0

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04206059']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

557-566

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Christian S Guay (CS)

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: cguay2@mgh.harvard.edu.

Darren Hight (D)

Department of Anaesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Gaurang Gupta (G)

Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

MohammadMehdi Kafashan (M)

Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Anhthi H Luong (AH)

Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.

Michael S Avidan (MS)

Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Emery N Brown (EN)

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Ben Julian A Palanca (BJA)

Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA; Center on Biological Rhythms and Sleep, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH