Breathe-squeeze: pharmacodynamics of a stimulus-free behavioural paradigm to track conscious states during sedation
EEG
consciousness
dexmedetomidine
monitor
responsiveness
sedation
sensory disconnection
sleep
Journal
British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1471-6771
Titre abrégé: Br J Anaesth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
received:
31
07
2022
revised:
03
01
2023
accepted:
16
01
2023
medline:
14
4
2023
pubmed:
27
3
2023
entrez:
26
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Conscious states are typically inferred through responses to auditory tasks and noxious stimulation. We report the use of a stimulus-free behavioural paradigm to track state transitions in responsiveness during dexmedetomidine sedation. We hypothesised that estimated dexmedetomidine effect-site (Ce) concentrations would be higher at loss of responsiveness (LOR) compared with return of responsiveness (ROR), and both would be lower than comparable studies that used stimulus-based assessments. Closed-Loop Acoustic Stimulation during Sedation with Dexmedetomidine data were analysed for secondary analysis. Fourteen healthy volunteers were asked to perform the breathe-squeeze task of gripping a dynamometer when inspiring and releasing it when expiring. LOR was defined as five inspirations without accompanied squeezes; ROR was defined as the return of five inspirations accompanied by squeezes. Brain states were monitored using 64-channel EEG. Dexmedetomidine was administered as a target-controlled infusion, with Ce estimated from a pharmacokinetic model. Counter to our hypothesis, mean estimated dexmedetomidine Ce was lower at LOR (0.92 ng ml The breathe-squeeze task can effectively track changes in responsiveness during sedation without external stimuli and might be more sensitive to state changes than stimulus-based tasks. It should be considered when perturbation of brain states is undesirable. NCT04206059.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Conscious states are typically inferred through responses to auditory tasks and noxious stimulation. We report the use of a stimulus-free behavioural paradigm to track state transitions in responsiveness during dexmedetomidine sedation. We hypothesised that estimated dexmedetomidine effect-site (Ce) concentrations would be higher at loss of responsiveness (LOR) compared with return of responsiveness (ROR), and both would be lower than comparable studies that used stimulus-based assessments.
METHODS
Closed-Loop Acoustic Stimulation during Sedation with Dexmedetomidine data were analysed for secondary analysis. Fourteen healthy volunteers were asked to perform the breathe-squeeze task of gripping a dynamometer when inspiring and releasing it when expiring. LOR was defined as five inspirations without accompanied squeezes; ROR was defined as the return of five inspirations accompanied by squeezes. Brain states were monitored using 64-channel EEG. Dexmedetomidine was administered as a target-controlled infusion, with Ce estimated from a pharmacokinetic model.
RESULTS
Counter to our hypothesis, mean estimated dexmedetomidine Ce was lower at LOR (0.92 ng ml
CONCLUSIONS
The breathe-squeeze task can effectively track changes in responsiveness during sedation without external stimuli and might be more sensitive to state changes than stimulus-based tasks. It should be considered when perturbation of brain states is undesirable.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT04206059.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36967282
pii: S0007-0912(23)00030-2
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.021
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dexmedetomidine
67VB76HONO
Hypnotics and Sedatives
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04206059']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
557-566Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.