Prioritization of public health financing, organization, and workforce transformation: a Delphi study in Canada.
COVID-19
Canada
Delphi
Priority setting
Public health systems
Thematic analysis
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 03 2023
22 03 2023
Historique:
received:
06
07
2022
accepted:
06
03
2023
entrez:
23
3
2023
pubmed:
24
3
2023
medline:
25
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The increased scrutiny on public health brought upon by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic provides a strong impetus for a renewal of public health systems. This paper seeks to understand priorities of public health decision-makers for reforms to public health financing, organization, interventions, and workforce. We used an online 3-round real-time Delphi method of reaching consensus on priorities for public health systems reform. Participants were recruited among individuals holding senior roles in Canadian public health institutions, ministries of health and regional health authorities. In Round 1, participants were asked to rate 9 propositions related to public health financing, organization, workforce, and interventions. Participants were also asked to contribute up to three further ideas in relation to these topics in open-ended format. In Rounds 2 and 3, participants re-appraised their ratings in the view of the group's ratings in the previous round. Eighty-six public health senior decision-makers from various public health organizations across Canada were invited to participate. Of these, 25/86 completed Round 1 (29% response rate), 19/25 completed Round 2 (76% retention rate) and 18/19 completed Round 3 (95% retention rate). Consensus (defined as more than 70% of importance rating) was achieved for 6 out of 9 propositions at the end of the third round. In only one case, the consensus was that the proposition was not important. Proposition rated consensually important relate to targeted public health budget, time frame for spending this budget, and the specialization of public health structures. Both interventions related and not related to the COVID-19 pandemic were judged important. Open-ended comments further highlighted priorities for renewal in public health governance and public health information management systems. Consensus emerged rapidly among Canadian public health decision-makers on prioritizing public health budget and time frame for spending. Ensuring that public health services beyond COVID-19 and communicable disease are maintained and enhanced is also of central importance. Future research shall explore potential trade-offs between these priorities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The increased scrutiny on public health brought upon by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic provides a strong impetus for a renewal of public health systems. This paper seeks to understand priorities of public health decision-makers for reforms to public health financing, organization, interventions, and workforce.
METHODS
We used an online 3-round real-time Delphi method of reaching consensus on priorities for public health systems reform. Participants were recruited among individuals holding senior roles in Canadian public health institutions, ministries of health and regional health authorities. In Round 1, participants were asked to rate 9 propositions related to public health financing, organization, workforce, and interventions. Participants were also asked to contribute up to three further ideas in relation to these topics in open-ended format. In Rounds 2 and 3, participants re-appraised their ratings in the view of the group's ratings in the previous round.
RESULTS
Eighty-six public health senior decision-makers from various public health organizations across Canada were invited to participate. Of these, 25/86 completed Round 1 (29% response rate), 19/25 completed Round 2 (76% retention rate) and 18/19 completed Round 3 (95% retention rate). Consensus (defined as more than 70% of importance rating) was achieved for 6 out of 9 propositions at the end of the third round. In only one case, the consensus was that the proposition was not important. Proposition rated consensually important relate to targeted public health budget, time frame for spending this budget, and the specialization of public health structures. Both interventions related and not related to the COVID-19 pandemic were judged important. Open-ended comments further highlighted priorities for renewal in public health governance and public health information management systems.
CONCLUSION
Consensus emerged rapidly among Canadian public health decision-makers on prioritizing public health budget and time frame for spending. Ensuring that public health services beyond COVID-19 and communicable disease are maintained and enhanced is also of central importance. Future research shall explore potential trade-offs between these priorities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36949440
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15373-9
pii: 10.1186/s12889-023-15373-9
pmc: PMC10031161
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
544Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Can J Public Health. 2010 Jul-Aug;101(4):314-7
pubmed: 21033545
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Nov;18(6):535-44
pubmed: 23023278
Int J Nurs Stud. 2001 Apr;38(2):195-200
pubmed: 11223060
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2:S159-66
pubmed: 25689187
Can J Public Health. 2021 Apr;112(2):186-190
pubmed: 33625685
Healthc Manage Forum. 2015 Nov;28(6):236-8
pubmed: 26347479
Can J Public Health. 2020 Feb;111(1):65-71
pubmed: 31667781
Health Soc Care Community. 1999 May;7(3):198-205
pubmed: 11560634
Can J Public Health. 2016 Oct 20;107(3):e326-e329
pubmed: 27763850
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):1344
pubmed: 30518348
NAM Perspect. 2021 Apr 07;2021:
pubmed: 34532688
Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Dec;43(12):2573-2586
pubmed: 30655580
Public Health Rep. 2009 May-Jun;124(3):372-7
pubmed: 19445412
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9
pubmed: 24581294
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 09;12:193
pubmed: 22776670
Am J Public Health. 2001 Aug;91(8):1235-9
pubmed: 11499110
Health Expect. 2013 Mar;16(1):3-13
pubmed: 21679287
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e006682
pubmed: 25550297
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476
pubmed: 21694759
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Jan;53(2):205-12
pubmed: 16422719
Can J Public Health. 2020 Jun;111(3):383-388
pubmed: 32514719
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15
pubmed: 11095242
Health Policy. 2021 Dec;125(12):1557-1564
pubmed: 34670685