Evaluation of a WASH/MNCH targeted primary health care program in Uganda; a mixed methods study.
Uganda
WASH/MNCH
integrated interventions
neonatal sepsis
skilled birth attendance
Journal
Health psychology and behavioral medicine
ISSN: 2164-2850
Titre abrégé: Health Psychol Behav Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101624393
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
entrez:
17
3
2023
pubmed:
18
3
2023
medline:
18
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Evidence on the impact of Maternal Newborn and child health (MNCH) and Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) interventions on skilled birth attendance (SBA) and neonatal sepsis remains unclear. We conducted this study in Amuru district to generate evidence. A before-and-after study design was conducted. Interventions implemented included; training of HCWs, construction of WASH facilities, and health education of communities. A digitized structured questionnaire was used to obtain data on ANC and SBA, WASH practices and prevalence of pneumonia and diarrhea among 466 expectant mothers and caretakers of under-fives at baseline, midterm and endline. Data on sepsis incidence, ANC, SBA and WASH status was obtained from six healthcare facilities. A total of 12 KIIs and 12 FGDs were conducted. Data were analyzed using STATA 15. Two sample tests of proportions were used to compare findings at baseline and endline. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. The number of women delivering at HCFs significantly increased from 41.4% to 63.0% ( This study revealed that integrated WASH/MNCH interventions can significantly increase ANC and SBA, reduce incidences of neonatal sepsis, diarrhea, pneumonia, and other related diseases and improve WASH practices in communities. Significant improvements in WASH/IPC and the capacity of HCWs to deliver safe MNCH services are realized.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Evidence on the impact of Maternal Newborn and child health (MNCH) and Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) interventions on skilled birth attendance (SBA) and neonatal sepsis remains unclear. We conducted this study in Amuru district to generate evidence.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A before-and-after study design was conducted. Interventions implemented included; training of HCWs, construction of WASH facilities, and health education of communities. A digitized structured questionnaire was used to obtain data on ANC and SBA, WASH practices and prevalence of pneumonia and diarrhea among 466 expectant mothers and caretakers of under-fives at baseline, midterm and endline. Data on sepsis incidence, ANC, SBA and WASH status was obtained from six healthcare facilities. A total of 12 KIIs and 12 FGDs were conducted. Data were analyzed using STATA 15. Two sample tests of proportions were used to compare findings at baseline and endline. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The number of women delivering at HCFs significantly increased from 41.4% to 63.0% (
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
This study revealed that integrated WASH/MNCH interventions can significantly increase ANC and SBA, reduce incidences of neonatal sepsis, diarrhea, pneumonia, and other related diseases and improve WASH practices in communities. Significant improvements in WASH/IPC and the capacity of HCWs to deliver safe MNCH services are realized.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36925760
doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2185245
pii: 2185245
pmc: PMC10013331
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2185245Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Références
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 May - Jun;46(3):e56-e64
pubmed: 28286075
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 13;11 Suppl 3:S11
pubmed: 21501428
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 3;21(1):912
pubmed: 34479549
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;17(12):
pubmed: 32560132
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 29;17(6):e0267660
pubmed: 35767568
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237085
pubmed: 32776958
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Apr;19(4):368-87
pubmed: 24506558
Reprod Health. 2015 Apr 08;12:30
pubmed: 25884616
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Feb;10(2):e195-e206
pubmed: 35063111
Glob Health Action. 2022 Dec 31;15(1):2141312
pubmed: 36369730
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211500
pubmed: 30730920
Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1333-1354
pubmed: 24263249
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 10;19(1):655
pubmed: 31500636
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11:CD011558
pubmed: 29148566
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 05;9(9):e106738
pubmed: 25191753
Reprod Health. 2016 Feb 16;13:13
pubmed: 26883425
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Mar;20(3):252-67
pubmed: 25430609
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Nov;4(11):e845-e855
pubmed: 27670090
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Mar 23;14:993-1001
pubmed: 33790628
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;22(2):249-55
pubmed: 21061925