Effectiveness of digital adherence technologies in improving tuberculosis treatment outcomes in four countries: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial protocol.
Epidemiology
Public health
Tropical medicine
Tuberculosis
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 03 2023
14 03 2023
Historique:
entrez:
14
3
2023
pubmed:
15
3
2023
medline:
17
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Successful treatment of tuberculosis depends to a large extent on good adherence to treatment regimens, which relies on directly observed treatment (DOT). This in turn requires frequent visits to health facilities. High costs to patients, stigma and burden to the health system challenged the DOT approach. Digital adherence technologies (DATs) have emerged as possibly more feasible alternatives to DOT but there is conflicting evidence on their effectiveness and feasibility. Our primary objective is to evaluate whether the implementation of DATs with daily monitoring and a differentiated response to patient adherence would reduce poor treatment outcomes compared with the standard of care (SOC). Our secondary objectives include: to evaluate the proportion of patients lost to follow-up; to compare effectiveness by DAT type; to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of DATs; to describe factors affecting the longitudinal engagement of patients with the intervention and to use a simple model to estimate the epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of the intervention from a health system perspective. This is a pragmatic two-arm cluster-randomised trial in the Philippines, South Africa, Tanzania and Ukraine, with health facilities as the unit of randomisation. Facilities will first be randomised to either the DAT or SOC arm, and then the DAT arm will be further randomised into medication sleeve/labels or smart pill box in a 1:1:2 ratio for the smart pill box, medication sleeve/label or the SOC respectively. We will use data from the digital adherence platform and routine health facility records for analysis. In the main analysis, we will employ an intention-to-treat approach to evaluate treatment outcomes. The study has been approved by the WHO Research Ethics Review Committee (0003296), and by country-specific committees. The results will be shared at national and international meetings and will be published in peer-reviewed journals. ISRCTN17706019.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36918242
pii: bmjopen-2022-068685
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068685
pmc: PMC10016242
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e068685Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R010161/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 5;381(10):986-987
pubmed: 31483974
Med Sci Monit. 2017 May 23;23:2465-2469
pubmed: 28534476
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 31;8(7):e16634
pubmed: 32735220
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0162944
pubmed: 27802283
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 29;(5):CD003343
pubmed: 26022367
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 11;3(5):e001018
pubmed: 30364330
PLoS Med. 2015 Sep 15;12(9):e1001876
pubmed: 26372470
Lancet. 1995 Jun 17;345(8964):1545-8
pubmed: 7677849
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 1;12(8):e0181205
pubmed: 28763456
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 23;24(2):e33062
pubmed: 35195534
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Jun;28(1):
pubmed: 34172505
PLoS Med. 2021 May 6;18(5):e1003628
pubmed: 33956802
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002595
pubmed: 29969463
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 2;18(1):583
pubmed: 29720146
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 25;14(10):
pubmed: 28946683
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 10;21(1):1149
pubmed: 34758737