Enhanced glycerol assimilation and lipid production in Rhodotorula toruloides CBS14 upon addition of hemicellulose primarily correlates with early transcription of energy-metabolism-related genes.

Biofuels Glycerol Lignocellulose Rhodotorula toruloides Transcriptomics

Journal

Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts
ISSN: 2731-3654
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918300888906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 05 12 2022
accepted: 01 03 2023
entrez: 10 3 2023
pubmed: 11 3 2023
medline: 11 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Lipid formation from glycerol was previously found to be activated in Rhodotorula toruloides when the yeast was cultivated in a mixture of crude glycerol (CG) and hemicellulose hydrolysate (CGHH) compared to CG as the only carbon source. RNA samples from R. toruloides CBS14 cell cultures grown on either CG or CGHH were collected at different timepoints of cultivation, and a differential gene expression analysis was performed between cells grown at a similar physiological situation. We observed enhanced transcription of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation and enzymes localized in mitochondria in CGHH compared to CG. Genes involved in protein turnover, including those encoding ribosomal proteins, translation elongation factors, and genes involved in building the proteasome also showed an enhanced transcription in CGHH compared to CG. At 10 h cultivation, another group of activated genes in CGHH was involved in β-oxidation, handling oxidative stress and degradation of xylose and aromatic compounds. Potential bypasses of the standard GUT1 and GUT2-glycerol assimilation pathway were also expressed and upregulated in CGHH 10 h. When the additional carbon sources from HH were completely consumed, at CGHH 36 h, their transcription decreased and NAD We suspect that the physiological reason for the accelerated glycerol assimilation and faster lipid production, was primarily the activation of enzymes that provide energy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Lipid formation from glycerol was previously found to be activated in Rhodotorula toruloides when the yeast was cultivated in a mixture of crude glycerol (CG) and hemicellulose hydrolysate (CGHH) compared to CG as the only carbon source. RNA samples from R. toruloides CBS14 cell cultures grown on either CG or CGHH were collected at different timepoints of cultivation, and a differential gene expression analysis was performed between cells grown at a similar physiological situation.
RESULTS RESULTS
We observed enhanced transcription of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation and enzymes localized in mitochondria in CGHH compared to CG. Genes involved in protein turnover, including those encoding ribosomal proteins, translation elongation factors, and genes involved in building the proteasome also showed an enhanced transcription in CGHH compared to CG. At 10 h cultivation, another group of activated genes in CGHH was involved in β-oxidation, handling oxidative stress and degradation of xylose and aromatic compounds. Potential bypasses of the standard GUT1 and GUT2-glycerol assimilation pathway were also expressed and upregulated in CGHH 10 h. When the additional carbon sources from HH were completely consumed, at CGHH 36 h, their transcription decreased and NAD
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We suspect that the physiological reason for the accelerated glycerol assimilation and faster lipid production, was primarily the activation of enzymes that provide energy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36899390
doi: 10.1186/s13068-023-02294-3
pii: 10.1186/s13068-023-02294-3
pmc: PMC9999650
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

42

Subventions

Organisme : Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
ID : 2018-01877

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 1;30(7):923-30
pubmed: 24227677
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3211-7
pubmed: 23071270
Metab Eng Commun. 2019 Aug 28;9:e00101
pubmed: 31720216
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Apr 2;62(13):2709-27
pubmed: 24628496
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 08;8:612832
pubmed: 33585414
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Oct;105(19):7411-7425
pubmed: 34491401
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019 Jun 29;12:169
pubmed: 31297157
Microorganisms. 2021 Aug 09;9(8):
pubmed: 34442772
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun;5(6):845-853
pubmed: 33782576
Nat Commun. 2012;3:1112
pubmed: 23047670
Genes (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;11(12):
pubmed: 33322033
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019 Jun 26;12:162
pubmed: 31289462
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010 Sep 01;3:19
pubmed: 20809958
Yeast. 2016 Aug;33(8):451-62
pubmed: 26945827
Bioresour Technol. 2021 Mar;323:124597
pubmed: 33387710
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019 Jun 04;12:137
pubmed: 31171938
Microorganisms. 2021 Sep 28;9(10):
pubmed: 34683364
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Microb Cell Fact. 2015 Dec 10;14:198
pubmed: 26655598
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Nov 08;6(1):157
pubmed: 24209984
ISME J. 2022 Jan;16(1):221-232
pubmed: 34294882
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 1;34(17):i884-i890
pubmed: 30423086
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Apr 30;21(9):
pubmed: 32365950
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 29;8(1):15945
pubmed: 30374026
Genomics. 2021 Nov;113(6):4022-4027
pubmed: 34648882
Nature. 2009 Apr 30;458(7242):1131-5
pubmed: 19339967
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Jan;102(1):143-151
pubmed: 29127468
J Appl Microbiol. 2018 Feb;124(2):336-367
pubmed: 29117646
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21800
pubmed: 21789182
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Aug 19;8:1008
pubmed: 32974324
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Jul;102(14):6269-6277
pubmed: 29804136
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019 Dec;116(12):3396-3408
pubmed: 31502665
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2020 Oct 16;367(19):
pubmed: 33068111
Yeast. 2006 Dec;23(16):1137-49
pubmed: 17133621
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1993 Feb;63(2):125-44
pubmed: 8259830
Elife. 2018 Mar 09;7:
pubmed: 29521624
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021 Mar 12;14(1):65
pubmed: 33712047
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Jun;87(2):715-27
pubmed: 20396879
Arch Microbiol. 1978 Jun 26;117(3):259-63
pubmed: 211971
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Mar;19(3):878-893
pubmed: 27878932
Mol Biol Cell. 2002 Aug;13(8):2598-606
pubmed: 12181332
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021 May 29;14(1):124
pubmed: 34051838
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
pubmed: 9254694
J Comput Biol. 2000 Feb-Apr;7(1-2):203-14
pubmed: 10890397
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60
pubmed: 25751142
Bioresour Technol. 2016 Jan;199:103-112
pubmed: 26482946
Elife. 2021 Mar 15;10:
pubmed: 33720010
J Bacteriol. 1977 Mar;129(3):1335-42
pubmed: 191434
Yeast. 2023 Jan 3;:
pubmed: 36597618
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Mar;1771(3):255-70
pubmed: 16950653
Mol Gen Genet. 1977 May 20;153(1):29-38
pubmed: 887070
Bioinformatics. 2020 Apr 1;36(7):2251-2252
pubmed: 31742321
Microb Cell Fact. 2021 Dec 7;20(1):221
pubmed: 34876155

Auteurs

Giselle C Martín-Hernández (GC)

Department of Molecular Sciences, BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7015, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.

Mikołaj Chmielarz (M)

Department of Molecular Sciences, BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7015, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.

Bettina Müller (B)

Department of Molecular Sciences, BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7015, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.

Christian Brandt (C)

Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Adrian Viehweger (A)

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Martin Hölzer (M)

Method Development and Research Infrastructure, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Robert Koch Institute, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

Volkmar Passoth (V)

Department of Molecular Sciences, BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7015, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. Volkmar.passoth@slu.se.

Classifications MeSH