Accessible mental well-being intervention for adolescents in school settings: a single-group intervention study using a pretest-post-test design.
Adolescents
Anxiety
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)
Depression
Intervention
Mental disorders
Mental health
Psychiatry
School
School nurses
Journal
Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health
ISSN: 1753-2000
Titre abrégé: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101297974
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Feb 2023
20 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
19
11
2022
accepted:
08
02
2023
entrez:
22
2
2023
pubmed:
23
2
2023
medline:
23
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A growing number of adolescents seek treatment for mental health problems, a circumstance that stresses the importance of implementing accessible treatment options. This study evaluates the impacts of brief, mental well-being intervention for adolescents in a school environment. As mental health interventions are often targeted at specific disorders, we sought a comprehensive approach to reach adolescents with a range of mental health symptoms. Single-group intervention study with a pretest-posttest design was utilized and conducted in lower, upper secondary, and vocational schools on adolescents ages 12-18 who sought medical attention for mental health symptoms. The cut-off point for inclusion was ≥ 14, for the Young Persons Clinical Outcomes for routine Evaluation (YP-CORE) measurement. The intervention included six face-to-face visits implemented by psychiatric nurses who received a 3-day training course. The impacts were evaluated after 6 weeks (n = 87) and again at 6 months (n = 68) and assessed using the YP-CORE, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS). The participants reported significant levels of mental distress at baseline with a YP-CORE mean score = 21.48, a BDI-II mean score = 23.60, OASIS mean score = 10.98. Post-intervention results at 6 weeks for the primary outcome YP-CORE showed a significant (p < .001) mean score decrease of - 3.82, a medium effect size d = .627. For participants attending upper secondary and vocational schools the YP-CORE scores changed significantly from baseline to 6-weeks (p = .005) and from baseline to 6-months (p < .001). Long-term outcomes at 6-months showed a - 1.14 decrease (p = non-significant), effect size d = .175. After the 6-week intervention, 12% of the participants were assessed as not requiring additional visits. This easily accessible intervention in a school setting indicated improvement for those participants with mild to moderate mental disorder symptoms and attending upper secondary and vocational schools. After the 6-week intervention, significant positive effects were observed. Participants reported substantial levels of mental distress at the baseline, which could contribute to the decline of symptoms and need for extended care during the 6 months follow-up. Trial registration Retrospectively registered with Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05356949.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A growing number of adolescents seek treatment for mental health problems, a circumstance that stresses the importance of implementing accessible treatment options. This study evaluates the impacts of brief, mental well-being intervention for adolescents in a school environment. As mental health interventions are often targeted at specific disorders, we sought a comprehensive approach to reach adolescents with a range of mental health symptoms.
METHODS
METHODS
Single-group intervention study with a pretest-posttest design was utilized and conducted in lower, upper secondary, and vocational schools on adolescents ages 12-18 who sought medical attention for mental health symptoms. The cut-off point for inclusion was ≥ 14, for the Young Persons Clinical Outcomes for routine Evaluation (YP-CORE) measurement. The intervention included six face-to-face visits implemented by psychiatric nurses who received a 3-day training course. The impacts were evaluated after 6 weeks (n = 87) and again at 6 months (n = 68) and assessed using the YP-CORE, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The participants reported significant levels of mental distress at baseline with a YP-CORE mean score = 21.48, a BDI-II mean score = 23.60, OASIS mean score = 10.98. Post-intervention results at 6 weeks for the primary outcome YP-CORE showed a significant (p < .001) mean score decrease of - 3.82, a medium effect size d = .627. For participants attending upper secondary and vocational schools the YP-CORE scores changed significantly from baseline to 6-weeks (p = .005) and from baseline to 6-months (p < .001). Long-term outcomes at 6-months showed a - 1.14 decrease (p = non-significant), effect size d = .175. After the 6-week intervention, 12% of the participants were assessed as not requiring additional visits.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This easily accessible intervention in a school setting indicated improvement for those participants with mild to moderate mental disorder symptoms and attending upper secondary and vocational schools. After the 6-week intervention, significant positive effects were observed. Participants reported substantial levels of mental distress at the baseline, which could contribute to the decline of symptoms and need for extended care during the 6 months follow-up. Trial registration Retrospectively registered with Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05356949.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36805796
doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00576-0
pii: 10.1186/s13034-023-00576-0
pmc: PMC9940674
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05356949']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
28Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Pediatr Nurs. 2019 Jul - Aug;47:23-29
pubmed: 31022629
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 May;48(3):420-439
pubmed: 32940884
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67 Suppl 7:18-23
pubmed: 16961420
Scand J Public Health. 2009 Jan;37(1):28-34
pubmed: 19141552
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 24;10:918
pubmed: 31068881
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 03;18(5):
pubmed: 33802278
Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17(3):314-24
pubmed: 26638219
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2016 May;21(2):115-123
pubmed: 32680371
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008 Jul;37(3):631-9
pubmed: 18645753
Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2093-102
pubmed: 21652063
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 09;12:779933
pubmed: 34955926
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59(6):618-627
pubmed: 28714184
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;57(11):1229-1238
pubmed: 27002215
Pediatrics. 2014 Sep;134(3):530-8
pubmed: 25136051
Lancet. 2011 Oct 22;378(9801):1515-25
pubmed: 22008427
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):370-93
pubmed: 25496340
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 May;87(5):407-421
pubmed: 30640482
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;49(3):226-36
pubmed: 18221350
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 May;71(4):250-255
pubmed: 28084134
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 Nov;48(6):497-516
pubmed: 30526384
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Nov;89:102079
pubmed: 34571372
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2019 Apr 11;13:19
pubmed: 31007713
J Adolesc. 2010 Jun;33(3):429-38
pubmed: 19647310
Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(4):245-9
pubmed: 16688739
Am J Psychother. 2014;68(4):359-83
pubmed: 26453343
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):281-295
pubmed: 34079068
World Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;22(1):105-115
pubmed: 36640411
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683