Medical student preparation for the operating room.

Clinical education Medical student Operating room Preparedness Surgery clerkship Undergraduate medical education

Journal

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland
ISSN: 1479-666X
Titre abrégé: Surgeon
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 101168329

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 11 10 2022
revised: 18 01 2023
accepted: 30 01 2023
medline: 20 9 2023
pubmed: 22 2 2023
entrez: 21 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study examines student perceptions of preparedness for the operating room (OR), resources used, and time spent in preparation. Third-year medical and second-year physician assistant students across two campuses at a single academic institution were surveyed to assess perceptions of preparedness, time spent in preparation, resources used, and perceived benefits of preparation. 95 responses (response rate 49%) were received. Students reported being most prepared to discuss operative indications and contraindications (73%), anatomy (86%), and complications (70%), but few felt prepared to discuss operative steps (31%). Students spent a mean of 28 min preparing per case, citing UpToDate and online videos as the most used resources (74%; 73%). On secondary analysis, only the use of an anatomic atlas was weakly correlated with improved preparedness to discuss relevant anatomy (p = 0.005); time spent, number of resources or other specific resources were not associated with increased preparedness. Students felt prepared for the OR, though there is room for improvement and a need for student-oriented preparatory materials. Understanding the deficits in preparation, preference for technology-based resources, and time constraints of current students can be used to inform optimisation for medical student education and resources to prepare for operating room cases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This study examines student perceptions of preparedness for the operating room (OR), resources used, and time spent in preparation.
METHODS METHODS
Third-year medical and second-year physician assistant students across two campuses at a single academic institution were surveyed to assess perceptions of preparedness, time spent in preparation, resources used, and perceived benefits of preparation.
RESULTS RESULTS
95 responses (response rate 49%) were received. Students reported being most prepared to discuss operative indications and contraindications (73%), anatomy (86%), and complications (70%), but few felt prepared to discuss operative steps (31%). Students spent a mean of 28 min preparing per case, citing UpToDate and online videos as the most used resources (74%; 73%). On secondary analysis, only the use of an anatomic atlas was weakly correlated with improved preparedness to discuss relevant anatomy (p = 0.005); time spent, number of resources or other specific resources were not associated with increased preparedness.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Students felt prepared for the OR, though there is room for improvement and a need for student-oriented preparatory materials. Understanding the deficits in preparation, preference for technology-based resources, and time constraints of current students can be used to inform optimisation for medical student education and resources to prepare for operating room cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36803863
pii: S1479-666X(23)00018-5
doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.01.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

295-300

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Kerry A Swanson (KA)

Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States. Electronic address: kerry.swanson@wustl.edu.

Jessica C Heard (JC)

Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, 1802 E. 19th St., Kravis Building, Tulsa, OK 74104, United States. Electronic address: Jessica-Heard@ouhsc.edu.

Zhamak Khorgami (Z)

Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, 1802 E. 19th St., Kravis Building, Tulsa, OK 74104, United States. Electronic address: zhamak-khorgami@ouhsc.edul.

C Anthony Howard (CA)

Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, 1802 E. 19th St., Kravis Building, Tulsa, OK 74104, United States. Electronic address: tony-howard@ouhsc.edu.

Baddr A Shakhsheer (BA)

Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States. Electronic address: baddr@wustl.edu.

Geoffrey S Chow (GS)

Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, 1802 E. 19th St., Kravis Building, Tulsa, OK 74104, United States. Electronic address: geoffrey-chow@ouhsc.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH