The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct.

Research misconduct codes of conduct in science policy development research ethics

Journal

Accountability in research
ISSN: 1545-5815
Titre abrégé: Account Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9100813

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Feb 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 31 1 2023
medline: 31 1 2023
entrez: 30 1 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In this paper we will describe the arguments to adopt a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct, we argue that this will increase the principle of legal certainty, improve procedures, and will promote scientific integrity in other, indirect ways. With the platform that we are currently setting up in the Netherlands as a motivating example, we finally also describe the prerequisites for such a platform, its contents as well as its value in the international context.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36716777
doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2172678
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-12

Auteurs

B Siegerink (B)

Dept Clinical Epidemiology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands.
Directorate of Research Policy, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands.

L A Pet (LA)

Dept Clinical Epidemiology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands.

F R Rosendaal (FR)

Dept Clinical Epidemiology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands.
Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.

M Y H G Erkens (MYHG)

Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH