Facial Soft Tissue Ptosis: A Quantitative Analysis using 3d Facial Scan App For iPhone.
Age
Aging face
BMI
Facial ptosis
Virtual planning
iPhone app
Journal
Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery
ISSN: 0972-8279
Titre abrégé: J Maxillofac Oral Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101538309
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
21
07
2021
accepted:
18
12
2021
pmc-release:
01
03
2024
entrez:
27
1
2023
pubmed:
28
1
2023
medline:
28
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although the modifications of the aging face have been widely described, to our knowledge, there are no studies that quantitatively analyze the degree of soft tissues facial ptosis. Using a specific iPhone application, the faces of a heterogeneous group of volunteers were scanned and studied with the aim to virtually measure the entity of facial ptosis.Two facial scans, upright and supine, were performed by using the Bellus3D Face app for iPhone in a sample of 60 volunteers. We virtually superimposed the two scans, and then, we calculated the discrepancy between them through the Geomagic Design X 3D software. A multivariate regression statistical model was used to analyze the correlation between the mean discrepancy values compared to three main variables: age, BMI and gender. Mean ptosis increases with age (coeff. = 0.02; 95% CI = 0.01-0.02, p < 0.001), BMI (coeff. = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.01-0.05; p < 0.001) and has been found higher in females (female versus male: coeff. = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.13-0.31; p < 0.001). The method we used allowed us to measure the degree of ptosis, and to make a complete morphological study of the effect of gravity on the facial surface in a very accurate, low cost and easily reproducible way.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36703646
doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01683-1
pii: 1683
pmc: PMC9871103
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
75-82Informations de copyright
© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Sep 1;110(3):885-96; discussion 897-911
pubmed: 12172155
Surv Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar - Apr;62(2):190-202
pubmed: 27693312
Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;32(3):253-60
pubmed: 27248022
J Fr Ophtalmol. 1998 May;21(5):361-73
pubmed: 9759430
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Mar;89(3):441-9; discussion 450-1
pubmed: 1741467
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1989 Winter;29(4):214-6
pubmed: 2592154
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Aug;36(4):753-60
pubmed: 22580543
Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E268-73
pubmed: 25545170
J Biomech. 2015 Sep 18;48(12):3306-11
pubmed: 26163751
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012 Jul-Aug;14(4):289-94
pubmed: 22351846
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jun;119(7):2219-2227
pubmed: 17519724
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Jun;37(3):513-5
pubmed: 23494030
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Jan;83(1):11-6
pubmed: 2909050
Clin Plast Surg. 1995 Apr;22(2):325-39
pubmed: 7634741
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 Mar;32(2):185-95
pubmed: 18183455
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;25(5):382-6
pubmed: 19966653
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988 Sep;82(3):383-94
pubmed: 3406175
Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Oct;33(5):470-482
pubmed: 28962053
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003 May-Jun;27(3):193-204
pubmed: 12925861
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):57-64
pubmed: 23806908