A life course framework for understanding digital technology use in the transition to adulthood.
Adolescence
Digital technology use
Life course
Mixed methods
Transition to adulthood
Journal
Advances in life course research
ISSN: 1879-6974
Titre abrégé: Adv Life Course Res
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100960029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
27
04
2020
revised:
05
08
2020
accepted:
09
10
2020
entrez:
25
1
2023
pubmed:
1
3
2021
medline:
1
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rapid increases in young people's time spent using digital technology ("screen time") in the mobile internet era have led to anxiety about long-term effects. This mixed-method US study examines childhood experiences and contextual factors that shape screen time in the transition to adulthood. We recursively analyzed 56 qualitative interviews with young adults in a large metropolitan area in 2016-2018 and prospective longitudinal nationally representative survey data (PSID-CDS-2007 and PSID-TAS-2017) to articulate a conceptual framework of life course influences on young adults' time spent using digital technologies. Inductive qualitative analyses built an initial framework, which was assessed with quantitative data, then further refined with qualitative analyses. Young adults drew on life course perspectives when discussing influences on their current digital technology use. As they suggested, in quantitative analyses more frequent adolescent technology use and greater device access weakly predicted increased technology frequency. Current school enrollment and several current peer factors predicted technology time. Interviewees emphasized the influence of parenting around technology use during adolescence, but parenting did not predict young adult screen time in quantitative analyses. Further qualitative analyses suggested that instead of influencing current technology time, earlier parenting shaped current emotional responses and imagined future technology use. We found young adults' technology use frequency to be informed by earlier experiences but highly malleable. Past technology use and current social contexts matter, but only up to a point. Moving beyond time use to incorporate emotional responses and future plans can better capture how the life course shapes technology use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36695150
pii: S1040-2608(20)30062-9
doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100379
pmc: PMC7574782
mid: NIHMS1642262
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100379Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : P2C HD066613
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
Future Child. 2000 Fall-Winter;10(2):31-43
pubmed: 11255707
Youth Soc. 2021 May 1;53(4):585-609
pubmed: 33911316
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 07;19(6):e196
pubmed: 28592394
Child Dev. 2010 Sep-Oct;81(5):1598-619
pubmed: 20840243
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 3;9(1):e023191
pubmed: 30606703
Fam Relat. 2012 Jul;61(3):455-469
pubmed: 23671354
Acad Pediatr. 2009 Sep-Oct;9(5):300-6
pubmed: 19592321
J Marriage Fam. 2019 Aug;81(4):795-811
pubmed: 31598004
Am Sociol Rev. 1965 Dec;30(6):843-61
pubmed: 5846306
Am Sociol Rev. 1968 Feb;33(1):46-62
pubmed: 5644339
Psychol Sci. 2019 May;30(5):682-696
pubmed: 30939250
Child Dev. 2018 Jan;89(1):5-16
pubmed: 28485017
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 18;8:61
pubmed: 20955578
Demography. 2004 Feb;41(1):87-107
pubmed: 15074126
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Jan;43:45-59
pubmed: 24267752
Longit Life Course Stud. 2012;3(2):
pubmed: 23482334
Pediatrics. 2007 May;119(5):e1006-15
pubmed: 17473074