Impact of differing methodologies for serum miRNA-371a-3p assessment in stage I testicular germ cell cancer recurrence.
clinical implementation
disease recurrence
germ cell testicular cancer
method optimization
miRNA - microRNA
serum biomarker
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
29
09
2022
accepted:
18
11
2022
entrez:
26
12
2022
pubmed:
27
12
2022
medline:
27
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Current evidence shows that serum miR-371a-3p can identify disease recurrence in testicular germ cell tumour (TGCT) patients and correlates with tumour load. Despite convincing evidence showing the advantages of including miR-371a-3p testing to complement and overcome the classical serum tumour markers limitations, the successful introduction of a serum miRNA based test into clinical practice has been impeded by a lack of consensus regarding optimal methodologies and lack of a universal protocol and thresholds. Herein, we investigate two quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) based pipelines in detecting disease recurrence in stage I TGCT patients under active surveillance, and compare the sensitivity and specificity for each method. Sequential serum samples collected from 33 stage I TGCT patients undergoing active surveillance were analysed for miR-371a-3p Using a pre-amplified protocol, all known recurrences were detected We conclude that incorporating pre-amplification increases sensitivity of miR-371a-3p detection, but produces more false positive results. The ideal protocol for quantification of miR-371a-3p still needs to be determined. TGCT patients undergoing active surveillance may benefit from serum miR-371a-3p quantification with earlier detection of recurrences compared to current standard methods. However, larger cross-institutional studies where samples are processed and data is analysed in a standardised manner are required prior to its routine clinical implementation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36568207
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1056823
pmc: PMC9773982
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1056823Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Christiansen, Lobo, Fankhauser, Rothermundt, Cathomas, Batavia, Grogg, Templeton, Hirschi-Blickenstorfer, Lorch, Gillessen, Moch, Beyer and Hermanns.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Feb;43(1):119-25
pubmed: 26614034
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;37(16):1412-1423
pubmed: 30875280
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 2;11(1):15582
pubmed: 34341387
Br J Cancer. 2016 Jan 19;114(2):151-62
pubmed: 26671749
Andrology. 2015 Jan;3(1):78-84
pubmed: 25187505
Andrology. 2015 Jan;3(1):4-12
pubmed: 25331326
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jul 23;148:w14640
pubmed: 30044478
Front Genet. 2019 May 22;10:463
pubmed: 31191602
J Urol. 2021 Jan;205(1):137-144
pubmed: 32856980
Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):213-220
pubmed: 27495845
Urol Int. 2016;97(1):76-83
pubmed: 26989896
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):331-7
pubmed: 25046619
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Jun;4(3):483-491
pubmed: 33288479
Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2017 Aug;40(4):379-388
pubmed: 28612337
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Dec;13(12):715-725
pubmed: 27754472
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov 10;39(32):3561-3573
pubmed: 34388002
Br J Cancer. 2012 Nov 6;107(10):1754-60
pubmed: 23059743
Br J Cancer. 2022 May;126(8):1140-1144
pubmed: 34912073
Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jan;135(1):119-25
pubmed: 21173133
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2008 Mar;47(3):185-96
pubmed: 18050305
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Feb;27(2):208-218
pubmed: 29254935
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 10;12:876732
pubmed: 35756620
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10;28(20):3388-404
pubmed: 20530278
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1580:265-279
pubmed: 28439839