Insights into adaptive evolution of plastomes in Stipa L. (Poaceae).
Adaptive pressure
Molecular evolution
Poaceae
Positive selection
Stipa
cpDNA
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Nov 2022
14 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
17
05
2022
accepted:
01
11
2022
entrez:
14
11
2022
pubmed:
15
11
2022
medline:
16
11
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The study presents results of research on the evolution of plastid genomes in Stipa L. which is a large genus of the Poaceae family, comprising species diverse in terms of geographic distribution, growing under highly variated habitat conditions. Complete plastome sequences of 43 taxa from Stipeae and Ampelodesmae tribes were analyzed for the variability of the coding regions against the background of phylogenetic relationships within the genus Stipa. The research hypothesis put forward in our research was that some of coding regions are affected by a selection pressure differentiated between individual phylogenetic lines of Stipa, potentially reducing the phylogenetic informativeness of these CDS. The study aimed to answer the question, which genes evolve in Stipa most rapidly and what kind of changes in the properties of encoded amino acids this entails. Another goal of this research was to find out whether individual genes are affected by positive selection and finally, whether selective pressure is uniform within the genus or does it vary between particular evolutionary lines within the genus. Results of our study proved the presence of selective pressure in 11 genes: ccsA, matK, ndhC, ndhF, ndhK, rbcL, rpoA rpoC1, rpoC2, rps8 and rps11. For the first time the effect of positive selection on the rps8, rps11, and ndhK genes was documented in grasses. The varied pace of evolution, different intensity and effects of selective pressure have been demonstrated between particular phylogenetic lines of the genus tested. Positive selection in plastid genome in Stipa mostly affects photosynthetic genes. The potential strongest adaptive pressure was observed in the rbcL gene, especially in the oldest evolutionary group comprising Central Asian high-mountain species: S. basiplumosa, S. klimesii, S. penicillata and S. purpurea, where adaptive pressure probably affected the amino acids directly related to the efficiency of CO
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The study presents results of research on the evolution of plastid genomes in Stipa L. which is a large genus of the Poaceae family, comprising species diverse in terms of geographic distribution, growing under highly variated habitat conditions. Complete plastome sequences of 43 taxa from Stipeae and Ampelodesmae tribes were analyzed for the variability of the coding regions against the background of phylogenetic relationships within the genus Stipa. The research hypothesis put forward in our research was that some of coding regions are affected by a selection pressure differentiated between individual phylogenetic lines of Stipa, potentially reducing the phylogenetic informativeness of these CDS. The study aimed to answer the question, which genes evolve in Stipa most rapidly and what kind of changes in the properties of encoded amino acids this entails. Another goal of this research was to find out whether individual genes are affected by positive selection and finally, whether selective pressure is uniform within the genus or does it vary between particular evolutionary lines within the genus.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Results of our study proved the presence of selective pressure in 11 genes: ccsA, matK, ndhC, ndhF, ndhK, rbcL, rpoA rpoC1, rpoC2, rps8 and rps11. For the first time the effect of positive selection on the rps8, rps11, and ndhK genes was documented in grasses. The varied pace of evolution, different intensity and effects of selective pressure have been demonstrated between particular phylogenetic lines of the genus tested.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Positive selection in plastid genome in Stipa mostly affects photosynthetic genes. The potential strongest adaptive pressure was observed in the rbcL gene, especially in the oldest evolutionary group comprising Central Asian high-mountain species: S. basiplumosa, S. klimesii, S. penicillata and S. purpurea, where adaptive pressure probably affected the amino acids directly related to the efficiency of CO
Identifiants
pubmed: 36372890
doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03923-z
pii: 10.1186/s12870-022-03923-z
pmc: PMC9661759
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amino Acids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
525Subventions
Organisme : National Science Center, Poland
ID : DEC-2013/09/B/NZ8/03287
Organisme : National Science Center, Poland
ID : DEC-2013/09/B/NZ8/03287
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Cell Biol. 2009 Jun 29;185(7):1195-207
pubmed: 19564403
J Biol Chem. 2000 Jan 14;275(2):942-8
pubmed: 10625631
PeerJ. 2020 Oct 13;8:e10051
pubmed: 33083127
Photosynth Res. 2000;65(1):7-13
pubmed: 16228466
Cladistics. 2010 Dec;26(6):563-578
pubmed: 34879600
Mol Ecol Resour. 2020 Nov;20(6):1761-1768
pubmed: 32623815
Bioinformatics. 2005 Mar 1;21(5):676-9
pubmed: 15509596
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Aug;19(8):1292-302
pubmed: 12140241
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Mar 1;34(3):772-773
pubmed: 28013191
J Biol Chem. 1993 Apr 15;268(11):7818-24
pubmed: 8463309
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Mar 02;19(3):
pubmed: 29498674
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(Web Server issue):W575-81
pubmed: 23609545
Plant Physiol. 1998 Aug;117(4):1165-70
pubmed: 9701572
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Jun;18(6):917-25
pubmed: 11371579
Planta. 2018 Jan;247(1):255-266
pubmed: 28956160
AoB Plants. 2015 May 04;7:
pubmed: 25940204
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jun;19(6):908-17
pubmed: 12032247
Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Mar 25;23(6):917-21
pubmed: 7537369
Gene. 2009 Jun 1;438(1-2):17-25
pubmed: 19236909
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4791-5
pubmed: 11607187
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):1924
pubmed: 29386579
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:523-50
pubmed: 12227339
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 28;21(1):76
pubmed: 31992185
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6700-5
pubmed: 19339501
J Biol Chem. 1988 Oct 5;263(28):14302-7
pubmed: 3049574
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
pubmed: 11524383
Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 01;9(7):3891-3898
pubmed: 31015974
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 30;7(1):4408
pubmed: 28667304
Bioinformatics. 2003 Mar 22;19(5):671-2
pubmed: 12651734
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 May 28;14(6):11376-91
pubmed: 23759988
Am J Bot. 1997 Jun;84(6):830
pubmed: 21708635
FEBS Lett. 2007 Feb 20;581(4):741-8
pubmed: 17274986
Plant Mol Biol. 2011 Jul;76(3-5):273-97
pubmed: 21424877
J Mol Evol. 2004 Jul;59(1):121-32
pubmed: 15383915
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15;28(12):1647-9
pubmed: 22543367
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 14;10(1):13803
pubmed: 32796878
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Nov;25(11):2361-8
pubmed: 18695049
Genetics. 2000 May;155(1):431-49
pubmed: 10790415
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2472-9
pubmed: 16107592
BMC Plant Biol. 2007 Oct 24;7:57
pubmed: 17956636
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 May;29(5):1297-300
pubmed: 22319160
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016 Nov;27(6):4661-4662
pubmed: 26678247
Gene. 2008 Jul 15;418(1-2):22-6
pubmed: 18486364
Front Zool. 2013 Sep 27;10(1):59
pubmed: 24073641
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 14;7(1):11506
pubmed: 28912548