15-Year Benefits of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality : A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials.


Journal

Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 11 10 2022
medline: 18 11 2022
entrez: 10 10 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) by sex and age in randomized trials is uncertain. To evaluate the 15-year effect of sigmoidoscopy screening on CRC incidence and mortality. Pooled analysis of 4 large-scale randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening. Norway, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy. Women and men aged 55 to 64 years at enrollment. Sigmoidoscopy screening. Primary end points were cumulative incidence rate ratio (IRR) and mortality rate ratio (MRR) and rate differences after 15 years of follow-up comparing screening versus usual care in intention-to-treat analyses. Stratified analyses were done by sex, cancer site, and age at screening. Analyses comprised 274 952 persons (50.7% women), 137 493 in the screening and 137 459 in the usual care group. Screening attendance was 58% to 84%. After 15 years, the rate difference for CRC incidence was 0.51 cases (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63 cases) per 100 persons and the IRR was 0.79 (CI, 0.75 to 0.83). The rate difference for CRC mortality was 0.13 deaths (CI, 0.07 to 0.19 deaths) per 100 persons, and the MRR was 0.80 (CI, 0.72 to 0.88). Women had less benefit from screening than men for CRC incidence (IRR for women, 0.84 [CI, 0.77 to 0.91]; IRR for men, 0.75 [CI, 0.70 to 0.81]; Data from the U.K. trial were less granular because of privacy regulations. This pooled analysis of all large randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening demonstrates a significant and sustained effect of sigmoidoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality for 15 years. Health Fund of South-East Norway.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) by sex and age in randomized trials is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the 15-year effect of sigmoidoscopy screening on CRC incidence and mortality.
DESIGN
Pooled analysis of 4 large-scale randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening.
SETTING
Norway, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy.
PARTICIPANTS
Women and men aged 55 to 64 years at enrollment.
INTERVENTION
Sigmoidoscopy screening.
MEASUREMENTS
Primary end points were cumulative incidence rate ratio (IRR) and mortality rate ratio (MRR) and rate differences after 15 years of follow-up comparing screening versus usual care in intention-to-treat analyses. Stratified analyses were done by sex, cancer site, and age at screening.
RESULTS
Analyses comprised 274 952 persons (50.7% women), 137 493 in the screening and 137 459 in the usual care group. Screening attendance was 58% to 84%. After 15 years, the rate difference for CRC incidence was 0.51 cases (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.63 cases) per 100 persons and the IRR was 0.79 (CI, 0.75 to 0.83). The rate difference for CRC mortality was 0.13 deaths (CI, 0.07 to 0.19 deaths) per 100 persons, and the MRR was 0.80 (CI, 0.72 to 0.88). Women had less benefit from screening than men for CRC incidence (IRR for women, 0.84 [CI, 0.77 to 0.91]; IRR for men, 0.75 [CI, 0.70 to 0.81];
LIMITATION
Data from the U.K. trial were less granular because of privacy regulations.
CONCLUSION
This pooled analysis of all large randomized trials of sigmoidoscopy screening demonstrates a significant and sustained effect of sigmoidoscopy on CRC incidence and mortality for 15 years.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
Health Fund of South-East Norway.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36215714
doi: 10.7326/M22-0835
doi:

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1525-1533

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Frederik E Juul (FE)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.).

Amanda J Cross (AJ)

Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (A.J.C., K.W.).

Robert E Schoen (RE)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (R.E.S.).

Carlo Senore (C)

University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy (C.S., N.S., P.A.).

Paul Pinsky (P)

National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Rockville, Maryland (P.P., E.M.).

Eric Miller (E)

National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Rockville, Maryland (P.P., E.M.).

Nereo Segnan (N)

University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy (C.S., N.S., P.A.).

Kate Wooldrage (K)

Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom (A.J.C., K.W.).

Paulina Wieszczy-Szczepanik (P)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland (P.W.).

Paola Armaroli (P)

University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy (C.S., N.S., P.A.).

Kjetil K Garborg (KK)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.).

Hans-Olov Adami (HO)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (H.O.A.).

Geir Hoff (G)

Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (G.H.).

Mette Kalager (M)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.).

Michael Bretthauer (M)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.).

Magnus Løberg (M)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (F.E.J., K.K.G., M.K., M.B., M.L.).

Øyvind Holme (Ø)

Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Health Trust, Kristiansand, Norway (Ø.H.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH