Global patterns of prescription pain medication usage in disorders of gut-brain interactions.
disorders of gut-brain interaction
pain
prescription pain medications
Journal
Neurogastroenterology and motility
ISSN: 1365-2982
Titre abrégé: Neurogastroenterol Motil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9432572
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
revised:
27
07
2022
received:
31
05
2022
accepted:
23
08
2022
pubmed:
17
9
2022
medline:
30
12
2022
entrez:
16
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Forty percent of individuals globally meet Rome IV criteria for a disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). The global burden of pain across these disorders has not been characterized. Our study included 54,127 respondents from the 26 Internet survey countries. Prescription pain medication usage was selected as the proxy for pain. The associations between prescription pain medications and the environmental, sociodemographic, psychosocial, and DGBI diagnosis variables were investigated using the multivariate generalized robust Poisson regression model. Respondents with DGBI used prescription pain medications at higher rates than those without a DGBI diagnosis with pooled prevalence rate of 14.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.4-15.3%), varying by country from 6.8% to 25.7%. The pooled prevalence ratio of prescription pain medication usage in respondents with and without DGBI was 2.2 (95% CI: 2.1-2.4). Factors associated with higher prevalence of pain medication usage among respondents with a DGBI diagnosis included living in a small community, increased anxiety, depression or somatization, increased stress concern or embarrassment about bowel functioning and having more than one anatomic DGBI diagnosis. 14.8% of patients globally with at least one diagnosis of DGBI were on prescription pain medications with wide geographic variation, about twice as many as their counterparts without a diagnosis of DGBI. Environmental, sociodemographic, and individual factors may influence clinicians to consider personalized, multimodal approaches to address pain in patients with DGBI.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Forty percent of individuals globally meet Rome IV criteria for a disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). The global burden of pain across these disorders has not been characterized.
METHODS
Our study included 54,127 respondents from the 26 Internet survey countries. Prescription pain medication usage was selected as the proxy for pain. The associations between prescription pain medications and the environmental, sociodemographic, psychosocial, and DGBI diagnosis variables were investigated using the multivariate generalized robust Poisson regression model.
KEY RESULTS
Respondents with DGBI used prescription pain medications at higher rates than those without a DGBI diagnosis with pooled prevalence rate of 14.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.4-15.3%), varying by country from 6.8% to 25.7%. The pooled prevalence ratio of prescription pain medication usage in respondents with and without DGBI was 2.2 (95% CI: 2.1-2.4). Factors associated with higher prevalence of pain medication usage among respondents with a DGBI diagnosis included living in a small community, increased anxiety, depression or somatization, increased stress concern or embarrassment about bowel functioning and having more than one anatomic DGBI diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
14.8% of patients globally with at least one diagnosis of DGBI were on prescription pain medications with wide geographic variation, about twice as many as their counterparts without a diagnosis of DGBI. Environmental, sociodemographic, and individual factors may influence clinicians to consider personalized, multimodal approaches to address pain in patients with DGBI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36111642
doi: 10.1111/nmo.14457
pmc: PMC10078418
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14457Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Neurogastroenterology & Motility published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan;160(1):99-114.e3
pubmed: 32294476
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Sep;20(9):2102-2111.e9
pubmed: 34896645
Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;26(1):224-7
pubmed: 9126524
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2918-2920.e1
pubmed: 34666155
Am J Clin Hypn. 2015 Oct;58(2):134-58
pubmed: 26264539
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 18;:
pubmed: 27144624
Gastroenterology. 2022 Jan;162(1):300-315
pubmed: 34529986
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Dec;33(12):e14145
pubmed: 33797116
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Jan;35(1):e14457
pubmed: 36111642
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;111(1):52-8
pubmed: 23794645
Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(6):1257-61
pubmed: 27147121
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD005110
pubmed: 17943840
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Mar;11(3):208-16; quiz e22-3
pubmed: 23103907
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):e945-e956
pubmed: 34052391
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Oct 1;24(4):544-558
pubmed: 30347934
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1350-65; quiz 1366
pubmed: 24935275
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Jun;34(6):e14315
pubmed: 34994058
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 16;12:806002
pubmed: 34975501
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;19(12):2481-2488.e1
pubmed: 34229040
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):357-68
pubmed: 24395196
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Apr 30;20(2):152-62
pubmed: 24840368
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Sep;19(9):1864-1872.e5
pubmed: 32629129
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jun;33(6):e14056
pubmed: 33300667