The relationship between shape perception accuracy and drawing ability.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2022
01 09 2022
Historique:
received:
17
11
2021
accepted:
22
08
2022
entrez:
1
9
2022
pubmed:
2
9
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accurate shape perception is critical for object perception, identification, manipulation, and recreation. Humans are capable of making judgements of both objective (physical) and projective (retinal) shape. Objective judgements benefit from a global approach by incorporating context to overcome the effects of viewing angle on an object's shape, whereas projective judgements benefit from a local approach to filter out contextual information. Realistic drawing skill requires projective judgements of 3D targets to accurately depict 3D shape on a 2D surface, thus benefiting from a local approach. The current study used a shape perception task that comprehensively tests the effects of context on shape perception, in conjunction with a drawing task and several possible measures of local processing bias, to show that the perceptual basis of drawing skill in neurotypical adults is not due to a local processing bias. Perceptual flexibility, the ability to process local or global information as needed, is discussed as a potential mechanism driving both accurate shape judgements and realistic drawing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36050496
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18858-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-18858-6
pmc: PMC9437069
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14900Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 28;358(1430):361-74
pubmed: 12639333
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1308-1317
pubmed: 26148824
Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(8):791-800
pubmed: 19264091
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 24;1079(1):47-56
pubmed: 16473340
Neuron. 2002 Feb 14;33(4):635-52
pubmed: 11856536
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):609-21
pubmed: 9180037
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Feb;39(2):339-49
pubmed: 18688703
J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Sep;41(9):1192-201
pubmed: 21116699
Psychol Sci. 2020 Apr;31(4):381-396
pubmed: 32163718
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(5):1007-25
pubmed: 25405522
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Aug;67(6):997-1009
pubmed: 16396008
J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Feb;31(1):5-17
pubmed: 11439754
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:247-257
pubmed: 28427891
Perception. 2010;39(8):1094-103
pubmed: 20942360
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(2):277-89
pubmed: 23263625
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Sep;39(9):1278-90
pubmed: 19381793
J Vis. 2011 Aug 17;11(9):
pubmed: 21849629
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;34(8):1351-64
pubmed: 8294523
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Jun;65:195-207
pubmed: 27068857
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):996-1003
pubmed: 16262494
J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Jan;36(1):5-25
pubmed: 16450045
Autism Res. 2010 Jun;3(3):113-9
pubmed: 20575110
J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Jan;36(1):27-43
pubmed: 16453071
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Jun;46(6):2224-2239
pubmed: 26914611
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;43(5):647-53
pubmed: 12120860
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):549-73
pubmed: 25420221
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(7):1448-66
pubmed: 23234461
Exp Brain Res. 1997 Apr;114(2):235-45
pubmed: 9166913