Involvement of sugar and abscisic acid in the genotype-specific response of rose to far-red light.
abscisic acid
architecture
far-red light
genotype-specific response
rose
sugar
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
26
04
2022
accepted:
28
06
2022
entrez:
8
8
2022
pubmed:
9
8
2022
medline:
9
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Plant architecture determines yield (fruit or flowers) and product quality in many horticultural species. It results from growth and branching processes and is dependent on genetic and environmental factors such as light quality. Highly significant genotype and light quality effects and their interaction have been demonstrated on the architecture of rose. Far-red (FR) light is known for its favourable effect on plant growth and development. We evaluated the effect of FR on rose growth and development and its interaction with the genotype through architectural, eco-physiological (net photosynthesis rate) and biochemical (sugar and hormone concentrations) approaches. Two cultivars ('The Fairy' - TF - and Knock Out
Identifiants
pubmed: 35937351
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.929029
pmc: PMC9355296
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
929029Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Crespel, Le Bras, Amoroso, Dubuc, Citerne, Perez-Garcia and Sakr.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Front Plant Sci. 2015 May 26;6:355
pubmed: 26074929
Plant Physiol. 2001 Feb;125(2):935-42
pubmed: 11161050
Tree Physiol. 2010 Jan;30(1):89-102
pubmed: 19955192
New Phytol. 2021 Feb;229(4):2135-2151
pubmed: 33068448
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Apr 8;20(1):148
pubmed: 32268881
Mol Plant. 2008 Jan;1(1):75-83
pubmed: 20031916
New Phytol. 2021 Aug;231(3):1088-1104
pubmed: 33909299
Plant Physiol. 2021 Apr 23;185(4):1500-1522
pubmed: 33793915
Plant Cell Physiol. 2012 Jun;53(6):1068-82
pubmed: 22505690
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 16;115(42):E9953-E9961
pubmed: 30275313
Hortic Res. 2021 Jul 1;8(1):143
pubmed: 34193859
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Oct 18;10:1296
pubmed: 31681386
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Dec 24;12:765995
pubmed: 35003159
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Mar;24(3):220-236
pubmed: 30797425
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Aug 24;19(9):
pubmed: 30149541
Plant Physiol. 2013 Oct;163(2):1047-58
pubmed: 23929720
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 May 28;19(6):
pubmed: 29843424
New Phytol. 2020 Jan;225(2):866-879
pubmed: 31529696
Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Aug 1;33(8):1339-50
pubmed: 20374536
Tree Physiol. 2004 May;24(5):579-88
pubmed: 14996662
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 06;21(3):
pubmed: 32041112
Plant Physiol. 2012 Oct;160(2):1110-9
pubmed: 22872775
Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Oct;34(10):1776-89
pubmed: 21635271
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 28;22(3):
pubmed: 33525430
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jan;15(1):67-74
pubmed: 22686322
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 28;10:322
pubmed: 30984211
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Oct 10;8:1724
pubmed: 29067031
J Exp Bot. 2007;58(8):2145-57
pubmed: 17490995
J Plant Physiol. 2017 Feb;209:115-122
pubmed: 28039776
J Plant Physiol. 2014 Mar 1;171(5):7-13
pubmed: 24484952
Plant J. 2017 Nov;92(4):611-623
pubmed: 28869799
Plant J. 2005 Aug;43(4):506-19
pubmed: 16098105
Plants (Basel). 2014 Apr 23;3(2):223-50
pubmed: 27135502
Tree Physiol. 2008 Feb;28(2):215-24
pubmed: 18055432
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 10;9(6):e99343
pubmed: 24914891
J Exp Bot. 2015 May;66(9):2569-82
pubmed: 25873679
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Jan 13;5:741
pubmed: 25628627