Normal B-cell ranges in infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
B cell
CD19
cord blood
flow cytometry
infants
lower limit of normal
newborns
normal range
reference range
Journal
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
ISSN: 1097-6825
Titre abrégé: J Allergy Clin Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1275002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
received:
03
03
2022
revised:
07
06
2022
accepted:
14
06
2022
pubmed:
22
6
2022
medline:
9
11
2022
entrez:
21
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
During the first year of life, B-cell level is a valuable indicator of whether external factors, such as exposure to B-cell-depleting therapies, have an adverse impact on immune system development. However, there are no standard reference ranges of B-cell levels in healthy infants by age. Our aim was to estimate the normal range of B-cell levels in infants, by age, during the first year of life by pooling data from published studies. Studies reporting B-cell levels measured by using flow cytometry and CD19 markers in healthy infants were identified via a systematic literature review. Quality and feasibility assessments determined suitability for inclusion in meta-analyses by age group and/or continuous age. Means and normal ranges (2.5th-97.5th percentile) were estimated for absolute and percentage B-cell levels. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of various assumptions. Of the 37 relevant studies identified, 28 were included in at least 1 meta-analysis. The means and normal ranges of B-cell levels were found to be 707 cells/μL in cord blood (range 123-2324 cells/μL), 508 cells/μL in infants aged 0 to 1 month (range 132-1369 cells/μL), 1493 cells/μL in infants aged 1 to 6 months (range 416-3877 cells/μL), and 1474 cells/μL in infants older than 6 months (range 416-3805 cells/μL). The continuous age model showed that B-cell levels peaked at week 26. Trends were similar for the percentage B-cell estimates and in sensitivity analyses. These meta-analyses provide the first normal reference ranges for B-cell levels in infants, by week of age, during the first year of life.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
During the first year of life, B-cell level is a valuable indicator of whether external factors, such as exposure to B-cell-depleting therapies, have an adverse impact on immune system development. However, there are no standard reference ranges of B-cell levels in healthy infants by age.
OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to estimate the normal range of B-cell levels in infants, by age, during the first year of life by pooling data from published studies.
METHODS
Studies reporting B-cell levels measured by using flow cytometry and CD19 markers in healthy infants were identified via a systematic literature review. Quality and feasibility assessments determined suitability for inclusion in meta-analyses by age group and/or continuous age. Means and normal ranges (2.5th-97.5th percentile) were estimated for absolute and percentage B-cell levels. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of various assumptions.
RESULTS
Of the 37 relevant studies identified, 28 were included in at least 1 meta-analysis. The means and normal ranges of B-cell levels were found to be 707 cells/μL in cord blood (range 123-2324 cells/μL), 508 cells/μL in infants aged 0 to 1 month (range 132-1369 cells/μL), 1493 cells/μL in infants aged 1 to 6 months (range 416-3877 cells/μL), and 1474 cells/μL in infants older than 6 months (range 416-3805 cells/μL). The continuous age model showed that B-cell levels peaked at week 26. Trends were similar for the percentage B-cell estimates and in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION
These meta-analyses provide the first normal reference ranges for B-cell levels in infants, by week of age, during the first year of life.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35728653
pii: S0091-6749(22)00835-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.06.006
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, CD19
0
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1216-1224Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.