Safety evaluation of the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers in the Sisonke study in South Africa: A phase 3b implementation trial.
Journal
PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
26
11
2021
accepted:
19
05
2022
entrez:
21
6
2022
pubmed:
22
6
2022
medline:
24
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Real-world evaluation of the safety profile of vaccines after licensure is crucial to accurately characterise safety beyond clinical trials, support continued use, and thereby improve public confidence. The Sisonke study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs) in South Africa. Here, we present the safety data. In this open-label phase 3b implementation study among all eligible HCWs in South Africa registered in the national Electronic Vaccination Data System (EVDS), we monitored adverse events (AEs) at vaccination sites through self-reporting triggered by text messages after vaccination, healthcare provider reports, and active case finding. The frequency and incidence rate of non-serious and serious AEs were evaluated from the day of first vaccination (17 February 2021) until 28 days after the final vaccination in the study (15 June 2021). COVID-19 breakthrough infections, hospitalisations, and deaths were ascertained via linkage of the electronic vaccination register with existing national databases. Among 477,234 participants, 10,279 AEs were reported, of which 138 (1.3%) were serious AEs (SAEs) or AEs of special interest. Women reported more AEs than men (2.3% versus 1.6%). AE reports decreased with increasing age (3.2% for age 18-30 years, 2.1% for age 31-45 years, 1.8% for age 46-55 years, and 1.5% for age > 55 years). Participants with previous COVID-19 infection reported slightly more AEs (2.6% versus 2.1%). The most common reactogenicity events were headache (n = 4,923) and body aches (n = 4,483), followed by injection site pain (n = 2,767) and fever (n = 2,731), and most occurred within 48 hours of vaccination. Two cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome and 4 cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome were reported post-vaccination. Most SAEs and AEs of special interest (n = 138) occurred at lower than the expected population rates. Vascular (n = 37; 39.1/100,000 person-years) and nervous system disorders (n = 31; 31.7/100,000 person-years), immune system disorders (n = 24; 24.3/100,000 person-years), and infections and infestations (n = 19; 20.1/100,000 person-years) were the most common reported SAE categories. A limitation of the study was the single-arm design, with limited routinely collected morbidity comparator data in the study setting. We observed similar patterns of AEs as in phase 3 trials. AEs were mostly expected reactogenicity signs and symptoms. Furthermore, most SAEs occurred below expected rates. The single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, supporting the continued use of this vaccine in this setting. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04838795; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202102855526180.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Real-world evaluation of the safety profile of vaccines after licensure is crucial to accurately characterise safety beyond clinical trials, support continued use, and thereby improve public confidence. The Sisonke study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs) in South Africa. Here, we present the safety data.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
In this open-label phase 3b implementation study among all eligible HCWs in South Africa registered in the national Electronic Vaccination Data System (EVDS), we monitored adverse events (AEs) at vaccination sites through self-reporting triggered by text messages after vaccination, healthcare provider reports, and active case finding. The frequency and incidence rate of non-serious and serious AEs were evaluated from the day of first vaccination (17 February 2021) until 28 days after the final vaccination in the study (15 June 2021). COVID-19 breakthrough infections, hospitalisations, and deaths were ascertained via linkage of the electronic vaccination register with existing national databases. Among 477,234 participants, 10,279 AEs were reported, of which 138 (1.3%) were serious AEs (SAEs) or AEs of special interest. Women reported more AEs than men (2.3% versus 1.6%). AE reports decreased with increasing age (3.2% for age 18-30 years, 2.1% for age 31-45 years, 1.8% for age 46-55 years, and 1.5% for age > 55 years). Participants with previous COVID-19 infection reported slightly more AEs (2.6% versus 2.1%). The most common reactogenicity events were headache (n = 4,923) and body aches (n = 4,483), followed by injection site pain (n = 2,767) and fever (n = 2,731), and most occurred within 48 hours of vaccination. Two cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome and 4 cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome were reported post-vaccination. Most SAEs and AEs of special interest (n = 138) occurred at lower than the expected population rates. Vascular (n = 37; 39.1/100,000 person-years) and nervous system disorders (n = 31; 31.7/100,000 person-years), immune system disorders (n = 24; 24.3/100,000 person-years), and infections and infestations (n = 19; 20.1/100,000 person-years) were the most common reported SAE categories. A limitation of the study was the single-arm design, with limited routinely collected morbidity comparator data in the study setting.
CONCLUSIONS
We observed similar patterns of AEs as in phase 3 trials. AEs were mostly expected reactogenicity signs and symptoms. Furthermore, most SAEs occurred below expected rates. The single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, supporting the continued use of this vaccine in this setting.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04838795; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202102855526180.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35727802
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004024
pii: PMEDICINE-D-21-04884
pmc: PMC9212139
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ad26COVS1
JT2NS6183B
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Vaccines
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04838795']
PACTR
['PACTR202102855526180']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1004024Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : K43 TW011178
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: JP received speakers fees from Johnson and Johnson, and spouse is employed by Johnson and Johnson. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 26;33(36):4398-405
pubmed: 26209838
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2187-2201
pubmed: 33882225
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7854):438-443
pubmed: 33690265
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jan;109(1):9-15
pubmed: 25573105
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):570-571
pubmed: 34077639
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Aug;9(8):786-92
pubmed: 20609629
Trends Immunol. 2014 Mar;35(3):97-104
pubmed: 24239225
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993
pubmed: 33220855
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;49:441.e3-441.e4
pubmed: 33980419
S Afr Med J. 2019 Dec 05;109(11b):69-76
pubmed: 32252872
Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1057-1058
pubmed: 33640038
S Afr Med J. 2021 Apr 20;111(6):535-537
pubmed: 34382561
Int J Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;2(1):3-5
pubmed: 19390910
Lancet HIV. 2021 Mar;8(3):e158-e165
pubmed: 33549166
BMJ. 2021 Feb 2;372:n308
pubmed: 33531333
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Oct 6;33:577-599
pubmed: 28992436
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 May;31(5):495-510
pubmed: 35191114
Lancet. 2022 Mar 19;399(10330):1141-1153
pubmed: 35305740
BMC Public Health. 2005 Mar 16;5:23
pubmed: 15771779
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 13;384(19):1824-1835
pubmed: 33440088
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2439-2450
pubmed: 33053279