Factors associated with enrolment in clinical trials among women with early-stage breast cancer.
breast neoplasms
clinical trial
quality of life
survivorship
Journal
ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
08
01
2022
revised:
16
05
2022
accepted:
17
05
2022
pubmed:
21
6
2022
medline:
12
7
2022
entrez:
20
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinical trials allow development of innovative treatments and ameliorate the quality of clinical care in oncology. Data show that only a minority of patients are enrolled in clinical trials. We assessed enrolment in clinical trials and its correlates among women with early breast cancer. We included 9516 patients with stage I-III breast cancer from the multicenter, prospective CANTO study (NCT01993498), followed-up until year 4 (Y4) post-diagnosis. We assessed factors associated with enrolment using multivariable logistic regression. In exploratory, propensity score matched analyses, we used multiple linear regression to evaluate the relationship of enrolment in clinical trials with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life (QoL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Summary Score and described clinical outcomes (distant disease event, invasive disease event, and death by any cause) according to enrolment. Overall, 1716 patients (18%) were enrolled in a clinical trial until Y4 post-diagnosis of breast cancer. Socioeconomic factors were not associated with enrolment. Centres of intermediate volume were most likely to enrol patients in clinical trials [versus low volume, odds ratio 1.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.95), P = 0.0124]. Among 2118 propensity score matched patients, enrolment was associated with better QoL at Y4 (adjusted mean difference versus not enrolled 1.37, 95% CI 0.03-2.71, P = 0.0458), and clinical outcomes (enrolled versus not enrolled, distant disease event 7.3% versus 10.1%, P = 0.0206; invasive disease event 8.2% versus 10.5%, P = 0.0732; death by any cause 2.8% versus 3.7%, P = 0.2707). In this large study, one in five patients enrolled on a clinical trial until Y4 after diagnosis of early breast cancer. Geographical and centre-related factors were significantly associated with enrolment in clinical trials. Inclusion in clinical trials seemed associated with improved QoL and clinical outcomes. Access to innovation for early-stage breast cancer patients should be encouraged and facilitated by overcoming organizational and geographical barriers to recruitment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Clinical trials allow development of innovative treatments and ameliorate the quality of clinical care in oncology. Data show that only a minority of patients are enrolled in clinical trials. We assessed enrolment in clinical trials and its correlates among women with early breast cancer.
METHODS
We included 9516 patients with stage I-III breast cancer from the multicenter, prospective CANTO study (NCT01993498), followed-up until year 4 (Y4) post-diagnosis. We assessed factors associated with enrolment using multivariable logistic regression. In exploratory, propensity score matched analyses, we used multiple linear regression to evaluate the relationship of enrolment in clinical trials with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life (QoL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Summary Score and described clinical outcomes (distant disease event, invasive disease event, and death by any cause) according to enrolment.
RESULTS
Overall, 1716 patients (18%) were enrolled in a clinical trial until Y4 post-diagnosis of breast cancer. Socioeconomic factors were not associated with enrolment. Centres of intermediate volume were most likely to enrol patients in clinical trials [versus low volume, odds ratio 1.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.95), P = 0.0124]. Among 2118 propensity score matched patients, enrolment was associated with better QoL at Y4 (adjusted mean difference versus not enrolled 1.37, 95% CI 0.03-2.71, P = 0.0458), and clinical outcomes (enrolled versus not enrolled, distant disease event 7.3% versus 10.1%, P = 0.0206; invasive disease event 8.2% versus 10.5%, P = 0.0732; death by any cause 2.8% versus 3.7%, P = 0.2707).
CONCLUSIONS
In this large study, one in five patients enrolled on a clinical trial until Y4 after diagnosis of early breast cancer. Geographical and centre-related factors were significantly associated with enrolment in clinical trials. Inclusion in clinical trials seemed associated with improved QoL and clinical outcomes. Access to innovation for early-stage breast cancer patients should be encouraged and facilitated by overcoming organizational and geographical barriers to recruitment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35724624
pii: S2059-7029(22)00133-8
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100513
pmc: PMC9271499
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01993498']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100513Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure BP reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Myriad, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi Sankyo, and non-financial support from Daiichi Sankyo, Merus, Puma, Pfizer, AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Références
Oncologist. 2015 Jun;20(6):572-5
pubmed: 25986245
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:105-114
pubmed: 31099636
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3737-3744
pubmed: 28968170
Cancer Control. 2014 Jul;21(3):209-14
pubmed: 24955704
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):635-42
pubmed: 22436109
ESMO Open. 2019 Sep 08;4(5):e000562
pubmed: 31555487
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Jun;64(6):575-82
pubmed: 18320183
BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):653
pubmed: 28923028
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Apr;216(4):774-80; discussion 780-1
pubmed: 23415510
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;126(5):949-957
pubmed: 31869454
Oncologist. 2020 Apr;25(4):e722-e732
pubmed: 32297435
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jul;98:17-22
pubmed: 29859337
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 May 1;109(5):
pubmed: 28376231
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 1;21(5):830-5
pubmed: 12610181
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2268-75
pubmed: 12805325
Oncology. 2016;91(4):185-193
pubmed: 27449344
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
Breast. 2014 Apr;23(2):170-4
pubmed: 24411195
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Feb;7(2):141-8
pubmed: 16455478
Ann Oncol. 2015 May;26(5):873-879
pubmed: 25725046
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Oct;14(10):2756-68
pubmed: 8874337
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Aug 1;109(8):
pubmed: 28376195
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Nov 1;17(11):1309-1316
pubmed: 31693986
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;54(3):217-24
pubmed: 11223318
JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2720-6
pubmed: 15187053
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Mar 1;111(3):245-255
pubmed: 30856272
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:185-98
pubmed: 27249699
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Sep;9(5):251-7
pubmed: 23943901
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Nov;19(11):1530-4
pubmed: 22989795
Qual Life Res. 2022 Mar;31(3):723-732
pubmed: 34324138
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939
pubmed: 27450481
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:79-88
pubmed: 26327487