Geometry of a DNA Nanostructure Influences Its Endocytosis: Cellular Study on 2D, 3D, and

3D spheroid DNA nanostructure endocytosis geometry in vivo tetrahedron

Journal

ACS nano
ISSN: 1936-086X
Titre abrégé: ACS Nano
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101313589

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 07 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 18 6 2022
medline: 15 11 2022
entrez: 17 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Fabrication of nanoscale DNA devices to generate 3D nano-objects with precise control of shape, size, and presentation of ligands has shown tremendous potential for therapeutic applications. The interactions between the cell membrane and different topologies of 3D DNA nanostructures are crucial for designing efficient tools for interfacing DNA devices with biological systems. The practical applications of these DNA nanocages are still limited in cellular and biological systems owing to the limited understanding of their interaction with the cell membrane and endocytic pathway. The correlation between the geometry of DNA nanostructures and their internalization efficiency remains elusive. We investigated the influence of the shape and size of 3D DNA nanostructures on their cellular internalization efficiency. We found that one particular geometry, i.e., the tetrahedral shape, is more favored over other designed geometries for their cellular uptake in 2D and 3D cell models. This is also replicable for cellular processes like cell invasion assays in a 3D spheroid model, and passing the epithelial barriers in in vivo zebrafish model systems. Our work provides detailed information for the rational design of DNA nanodevices for their upcoming biological and biomedical applications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35715010
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.2c01382
doi:

Substances chimiques

DNA 9007-49-2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

10496-10508

Auteurs

Anjali Rajwar (A)

Biological Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India.

Shravani Reddy Shetty (SR)

Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai 400005, India.

Payal Vaswani (P)

Biological Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India.

Vinod Morya (V)

Biological Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India.

Amlan Barai (A)

Bioscience and Bioengineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India.

Shamik Sen (S)

Bioscience and Bioengineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400076, India.

Mahendra Sonawane (M)

Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai 400005, India.

Dhiraj Bhatia (D)

Biological Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India.
Center for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382355, India.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH