Operative Planning of Chest Wall Reconstructions Illustrated by a Large Defect in a Child.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
received: 07 02 2022
accepted: 30 03 2022
entrez: 15 6 2022
pubmed: 16 6 2022
medline: 16 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Reconstruction of large chest wall defects is challenging. Here we discuss the process of decision-making in planning chest wall reconstruction, considering the requirements of tumor removal, stabilization of the chest wall, and soft tissue coverage, illustrated by a case of a hemi-chest wall defect in a child. Ewing sarcoma measuring 10 × 9 × 13 cm was resected in a 9-year-old boy, followed by stabilization using a Gore-Tex patch. Due to extension of the oncologic resection far into the superomedial quadrant of the chest, tension-free coverage with a classical latissimus-dorsi flap could not be achieved. Integrating the serratus-anterior muscle into the flap creating a chimeric latissimus-dorsi/serratus-anterior flap allowed for excellent soft tissue coverage of the foreign body. As the skin could be preserved, careful incision planning was necessary to allow for best possible exposure during oncologic resection and flap harvest, while ensuring skin vascularization impaired by underlying tumor resection. Two vertical skin incisions were chosen, one presternal and a second in the mid-axillary fold delineating a large bipedicled skin flap. Postoperative recovery was excellent. Solid skin vascularization and adequate soft tissue coverage of the alloplastic material allowed for the patient to receive two cycles of postoperative radiotherapy without developing wound dehiscence. Careful interdisciplinary planning of skin incisions allowed for good exposure for tumor resection and flap harvest while preserving skin vascularization. Choosing a chimeric latissimus-dorsi/serratus-anterior flap provided larger coverage than a classical latissimus-dorsi flap with minimal additional donor site morbidity. Taken together, we here present a pragmatic solution to a complex problem.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35702538
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004326
pmc: PMC9187196
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

e4326

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Références

Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;72:290-293
pubmed: 32563088
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):240e-252e
pubmed: 20009799
Clin Plast Surg. 2003 Jul;30(3):331-42, v
pubmed: 12916590
Br J Plast Surg. 2004 Jun;57(4):295-302
pubmed: 15145731
Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Aug;63(2):188-92
pubmed: 19593110
Front Oncol. 2015 Oct 29;5:247
pubmed: 26579499

Auteurs

Dominik André-Lévigne (D)

Division of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Ali Modarressi (A)

Division of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Wolfram Karenovics (W)

Division of Thoracic and Endocrine Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jean-Marc Joseph (JM)

Unit of Paediatric Surgery, Woman-Mother-Child Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.

Jim C H Wilde (JCH)

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Brigitte Pittet-Cuénod (B)

Division of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH