Missing in action: the right to the highest attainable standard of mental health care.
Access
Disability
Discrimination
Human rights
International obligations
Legislation
Mental health
Mental health services
Mental health standards
Journal
International journal of mental health systems
ISSN: 1752-4458
Titre abrégé: Int J Ment Health Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101294224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jun 2022
11 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
27
11
2021
accepted:
18
05
2022
entrez:
11
6
2022
pubmed:
12
6
2022
medline:
12
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The right to the highest attainable standard of mental health remains a distant goal worldwide. The Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the right of all people to enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health pleaded the urgent need for governments to act through appropriate laws and policies. We argue that Australia is in breach of international obligations, with inadequate access to mental health services, inconsistent mental health legislation across jurisdictions and ongoing structural (systematic) and individual discrimination. Inadequate access to mental health services is a worldwide phenomenon. Australia has committed to international law obligations under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) to 'promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disability, with respect to their inherent dignity'. This includes people with mental health impairment and this convention includes the right to 'the highest attainable standard of mental health'. Under the Australian Constitution, ratification of this convention enables the national government to pass laws to implement the convention obligations, and such national laws would prevail over any inconsistent state (or territory) laws governing mental health service provision. The authors argue that enabling positive rights through legislation and legally binding mental health service standards may facilitate enhanced accountability and enforcement of such rights. These steps may support critical key stakeholders to improve the standards of mental health service provision supported by the implementation of international obligations, thereby accelerating mental health system reform. Improved legislation would encourage better governance and the evolution of better services, making mental health care more accessible, without structural or individual discrimination, enabling all people to enjoy the highest attainable standard of health.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The right to the highest attainable standard of mental health remains a distant goal worldwide. The Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the right of all people to enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health pleaded the urgent need for governments to act through appropriate laws and policies. We argue that Australia is in breach of international obligations, with inadequate access to mental health services, inconsistent mental health legislation across jurisdictions and ongoing structural (systematic) and individual discrimination.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Inadequate access to mental health services is a worldwide phenomenon. Australia has committed to international law obligations under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) to 'promote, protect and ensure the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by all persons with disability, with respect to their inherent dignity'. This includes people with mental health impairment and this convention includes the right to 'the highest attainable standard of mental health'. Under the Australian Constitution, ratification of this convention enables the national government to pass laws to implement the convention obligations, and such national laws would prevail over any inconsistent state (or territory) laws governing mental health service provision. The authors argue that enabling positive rights through legislation and legally binding mental health service standards may facilitate enhanced accountability and enforcement of such rights. These steps may support critical key stakeholders to improve the standards of mental health service provision supported by the implementation of international obligations, thereby accelerating mental health system reform. Improved legislation would encourage better governance and the evolution of better services, making mental health care more accessible, without structural or individual discrimination, enabling all people to enjoy the highest attainable standard of health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35690833
doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00537-8
pii: 10.1186/s13033-022-00537-8
pmc: PMC9187849
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
26Subventions
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : 511921
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Med J Aust. 2004 Feb 16;180(4):163-5
pubmed: 14960134
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):1-6
pubmed: 32669784
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2005 Mar-Apr;28(2):141-53
pubmed: 15862871
Lancet. 2007 Aug 4;370(9585):369-71
pubmed: 17679000
J Law Med. 2008 May;15(5):773-81
pubmed: 18575177
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):483-490
pubmed: 29325437
J Public Health Policy. 2013 Nov;34(4):574-9
pubmed: 24132184
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1988;15:148
pubmed: 12289227
Australas Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;20(2):85-90
pubmed: 22467558
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):109-130
pubmed: 28559680
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Jan - Feb;62:16-19
pubmed: 30616850
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):351-353
pubmed: 32669817
Aust J Prim Health. 2011;17(3):220-6
pubmed: 21896257
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222
pubmed: 33069326
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2005 Mar-Apr;28(2):183-205
pubmed: 15862874