Deep Learning-Based Digitally Reconstructed Tomography of the Chest in the Evaluation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: A Feasibility Study.
Machine learning
chest radiographs
computed tomography
digital reconstruction
solitary pulmonary nodule
synthetic imaging
Journal
Academic radiology
ISSN: 1878-4046
Titre abrégé: Acad Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9440159
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
received:
30
03
2022
revised:
07
05
2022
accepted:
09
05
2022
pmc-release:
01
04
2024
medline:
31
3
2023
pubmed:
12
6
2022
entrez:
11
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Computed tomography (CT) is preferred for evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) but access or availability may be lacking, in addition, overlapping anatomy can hinder detection of SPNs on chest radiographs. We developed and evaluated the clinical feasibility of a deep learning algorithm to generate digitally reconstructed tomography (DRT) images of the chest from digitally reconstructed frontal and lateral radiographs (DRRs) and use them to detect SPNs. This single-institution retrospective study included 637 patients with noncontrast helical CT of the chest (mean age 68 years, median age 69 years, standard deviation 11.7 years; 355 women) between 11/2012 and 12/2020, with SPNs measuring 10-30 mm. A deep learning model was trained on 562 patients, validated on 60 patients, and tested on the remaining 15 patients. Diagnostic performance (SPN detection) from planar radiography (DRRs and CT scanograms, PR) alone or with DRT was evaluated by two radiologists in an independent blinded fashion. The quality of the DRT SPN image in terms of nodule size and location, morphology, and opacity was also evaluated, and compared to the ground-truth CT images RESULTS: Diagnostic performance was higher from DRT plus PR than from PR alone (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.95-0.98 versus 0.80-0.85; p < 0.05). DRT plus PR enabled diagnosis of SPNs in 11 more patients than PR alone. Interobserver agreement was 0.82 for DRT plus PR and 0.89 for PR alone; and interobserver agreement for size and location, morphology, and opacity of the DRT SPN was 0.94, 0.68, and 0.38, respectively. For SPN detection, DRT plus PR showed better diagnostic performance than PR alone. Deep learning can be used to generate DRT images and improve detection of SPNs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35690536
pii: S1076-6332(22)00307-5
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.05.005
pmc: PMC9732145
mid: NIHMS1815331
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
739-748Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : 75N92020C00008
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : 75N92020C00021
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):180-188
pubmed: 33201790
Acad Radiol. 2021 Aug;28(8):1151-1158
pubmed: 34134940
Radiology. 2003 Mar;226(3):756-61
pubmed: 12601181
Clin Chest Med. 2013 Sep;34(3):365-71
pubmed: 23993809
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 May;8(Suppl 1):S106-S121
pubmed: 31211111
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Oct 01;34:60
pubmed: 31762925
Neural Netw. 2020 Apr;124:269-279
pubmed: 32035306
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Oct;46(10):5021-5036
pubmed: 34075469
Radiology. 2014 Jul;272(1):252-61
pubmed: 24635675
Radiol Artif Intell. 2019 Oct 09;1(6):e180011
pubmed: 33937803
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Feb 12;35:38
pubmed: 32499854
Chest. 1999 Mar;115(3):720-4
pubmed: 10084482
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Scott Med J. 1990 Oct;35(5):140-1
pubmed: 2255895
Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1):114-21
pubmed: 15249451
J Thorac Imaging. 2019 Mar;34(2):75-85
pubmed: 30802231
Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):2232-2242
pubmed: 30848498