Patient and Health Professional Perceptions of Telemonitoring for Hypertension Management: Qualitative Study.
hypertension
mobile phone
precision health
remote blood pressure monitoring
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jun 2022
10 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
18
08
2021
accepted:
13
04
2022
revised:
07
03
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
11
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hypertension is the most prevalent and important risk factor for cardiovascular disease, affecting nearly 50% of the US adult population; however, only 30% of these patients achieve controlled blood pressure (BP). Incorporating strategies into primary care that take into consideration individual patient needs, such as remote BP monitoring, may improve hypertension management. From March 2018 to December 2018, Stanford implemented a precision health pilot called Humanwide, which aimed to leverage high-technology and high-touch medicine to tailor individualized care for conditions such as hypertension. We examined multi-stakeholder perceptions of hypertension management in Humanwide to evaluate the program's acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability. We conducted semistructured interviews with 16 patients and 15 health professionals to assess their experiences with hypertension management in Humanwide. We transcribed and analyzed the interviews using a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive analysis to identify common themes around hypertension management and consensus methods to ensure reliability and validity. A total of 63% (10/16) of the patients and 40% (6/15) of the health professionals mentioned hypertension in the context of Humanwide. These participants reported that remote BP monitoring improved motivation, BP control, and overall clinic efficiency. The health professionals discussed feasibility challenges, including the time needed to analyze BP data and provide individualized feedback, integration of BP data, technological difficulties with the BP cuff, and decreased patient use of remote BP monitoring over time. Remote BP monitoring for hypertension management in Humanwide was acceptable to patients and health professionals and appropriate for care. Important challenges need to be addressed to improve the feasibility and sustainability of this approach by leveraging team-based care, engaging patients to sustain remote BP monitoring, standardizing electronic medical record integration of BP measurements, and finding more user-friendly BP cuffs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hypertension is the most prevalent and important risk factor for cardiovascular disease, affecting nearly 50% of the US adult population; however, only 30% of these patients achieve controlled blood pressure (BP). Incorporating strategies into primary care that take into consideration individual patient needs, such as remote BP monitoring, may improve hypertension management.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
From March 2018 to December 2018, Stanford implemented a precision health pilot called Humanwide, which aimed to leverage high-technology and high-touch medicine to tailor individualized care for conditions such as hypertension. We examined multi-stakeholder perceptions of hypertension management in Humanwide to evaluate the program's acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted semistructured interviews with 16 patients and 15 health professionals to assess their experiences with hypertension management in Humanwide. We transcribed and analyzed the interviews using a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive analysis to identify common themes around hypertension management and consensus methods to ensure reliability and validity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 63% (10/16) of the patients and 40% (6/15) of the health professionals mentioned hypertension in the context of Humanwide. These participants reported that remote BP monitoring improved motivation, BP control, and overall clinic efficiency. The health professionals discussed feasibility challenges, including the time needed to analyze BP data and provide individualized feedback, integration of BP data, technological difficulties with the BP cuff, and decreased patient use of remote BP monitoring over time.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Remote BP monitoring for hypertension management in Humanwide was acceptable to patients and health professionals and appropriate for care. Important challenges need to be addressed to improve the feasibility and sustainability of this approach by leveraging team-based care, engaging patients to sustain remote BP monitoring, standardizing electronic medical record integration of BP measurements, and finding more user-friendly BP cuffs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35687380
pii: v6i6e32874
doi: 10.2196/32874
pmc: PMC9233257
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e32874Informations de copyright
©Juliana Baratta, Cati Brown-Johnson, Nadia Safaeinili, Lisa Goldman Rosas, Latha Palaniappan, Marcy Winget, Megan Mahoney. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 10.06.2022.
Références
J Hypertens. 2018 Nov;36(11):2125-2131
pubmed: 30063638
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020 Jun 6;22(6):42
pubmed: 32506273
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 20;16(8):e0255578
pubmed: 34415946
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Jun 14;2:53
pubmed: 31304399
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jan 24;17(1):11
pubmed: 28118817
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Jun 13;6:76
pubmed: 31263703
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):192-204
pubmed: 25531400
Clin Sci (Lond). 2017 Nov 6;131(22):2671-2685
pubmed: 29109301
JMIR Cardio. 2019 Mar 26;3(1):e11951
pubmed: 31758771
Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1334-1357
pubmed: 32370572
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Jan;11(1):1-12
pubmed: 31893559
Ann Fam Med. 2019 May;17(3):273
pubmed: 31085532
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):235-237
pubmed: 34865499
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Oct 04;17(10):
pubmed: 28976940
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jul;20(7):1128-1132
pubmed: 30003701
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):210-9
pubmed: 26341941
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2143590
pubmed: 35029664
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 9;22(4):e17201
pubmed: 32271148
Hypertension. 2007 Dec;50(6):991-7
pubmed: 17954719
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):199-206
pubmed: 12851274
BMJ. 2009 May 19;338:b1665
pubmed: 19454737
Eur Cardiol. 2015 Dec;10(2):95-101
pubmed: 30310433
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248
pubmed: 29146535
Hypertension. 2019 May;73(5):e35-e66
pubmed: 30827125
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(4):559-567
pubmed: 28569681
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
Indian J Psychol Med. 2021 Jan;43(1):86-88
pubmed: 34349313
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181617
pubmed: 30646139
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jan 16;168(2):110-120
pubmed: 29277852
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 19;19(9):e311
pubmed: 28928111
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Feb 2;22(1):28
pubmed: 33530939
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 19;14(9):e1002389
pubmed: 28926573
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016 Jun;18(6):49
pubmed: 27137524
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(4):e552-e559
pubmed: 29897560