Radiofrequency Ablation for the Knee Joint: A Survey by the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience.

genicular nerve ablation genicular nerve block genicular nerve survey knee radiofrequency ablation radiofrequency ablation

Journal

Journal of pain research
ISSN: 1178-7090
Titre abrégé: J Pain Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101540514

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 29 12 2021
accepted: 14 04 2022
entrez: 5 5 2022
pubmed: 6 5 2022
medline: 6 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40% and is continuously increasing with an aging population. Over the past two decades, proceduralists have adopted variations in patient preparation, procedural steps, and post-operative care for genicular nerve RFA procedures. A survey was dispensed via the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) to gain a popular assessment of common practices for genicular nerve RFA. A 29 question survey was dispensed via SurveyMonkey to all members of ASPN. Members were able to respond to the survey a single time and were unable to make changes to their responses once the survey was submitted. After responses were compiled, each question was assessed in order to determine common practices for genicular nerve RFA. A total of 378 proceduralists responded to the survey. There was high consensus with the three most commonly targeted nerves. The inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular branches were treated by 95-96% of respondents, while other targets were less commonly treated. There remains some debate among proceduralists regarding the need for a second diagnostic nerve block and the type of steroid used for diagnostic nerve blocks. Pain physicians use a wide variety of methods to perform genicular nerve ablations. The data offered by the survey show that there is no standardized protocol when it comes to treating knee pain via genicular nerve block and ablation and highlights controversies among proceduralists that ought to serve as the targets of future clinical research aimed at establishing a standardized protocol.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective, minimally invasive procedure often used to treat patients with intractable knee pain secondary to knee osteoarthritis and failed knee replacements. The prevalence of knee pain in adults has been estimated to be as high as 40% and is continuously increasing with an aging population. Over the past two decades, proceduralists have adopted variations in patient preparation, procedural steps, and post-operative care for genicular nerve RFA procedures. A survey was dispensed via the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) to gain a popular assessment of common practices for genicular nerve RFA.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A 29 question survey was dispensed via SurveyMonkey to all members of ASPN. Members were able to respond to the survey a single time and were unable to make changes to their responses once the survey was submitted. After responses were compiled, each question was assessed in order to determine common practices for genicular nerve RFA.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 378 proceduralists responded to the survey. There was high consensus with the three most commonly targeted nerves. The inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular branches were treated by 95-96% of respondents, while other targets were less commonly treated. There remains some debate among proceduralists regarding the need for a second diagnostic nerve block and the type of steroid used for diagnostic nerve blocks.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Pain physicians use a wide variety of methods to perform genicular nerve ablations. The data offered by the survey show that there is no standardized protocol when it comes to treating knee pain via genicular nerve block and ablation and highlights controversies among proceduralists that ought to serve as the targets of future clinical research aimed at establishing a standardized protocol.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35509622
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S342653
pii: 342653
pmc: PMC9057892
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1247-1255

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Abd-Elsayed et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr Karina Gritsenko is consultant for Avanos and Pacira. Dr Krishnan Chakravarthy reports Consultant to Biotronik, Bioventus, Mainstay Medical, Medtronic, SI Bone, Vertos Medical, Vivex Biologics. Dr Krishnan Chakravarthy reports consultant to Biotronik, Bioventus, Mainstay Medical, Medtronic, SI Bone, Vertos Medical, and Vivex Biologics. Dr Dawood Sayed reports personal fees from Medtronic and Abbott, outside the submitted work. Dr Timothy Deer reports grants and travel from American Society of Pain and Neuroscience, during the conduct of the study; personal fees for consultant from Abbott and research funding from Avanos, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Références

Pain Res Manag. 2020 Sep 19;2020:2537075
pubmed: 33014212
Pain Physician. 2018 Mar;21(2):169-177
pubmed: 29565947
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):E437-E444
pubmed: 28339444
Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):139-146
pubmed: 30921977
Pain Med. 2014 Dec;15(12):2020-36
pubmed: 25312825
Pain Physician. 2018 Jan;21(1):41-52
pubmed: 29357330
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jun;46(6):518-523
pubmed: 33483425
Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 Apr;48(4):271-80
pubmed: 2712610
Pain Physician. 2016 Jul;19(5):E697-705
pubmed: 27389113
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):155-171
pubmed: 28339430
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 6;155(11):725-32
pubmed: 22147711
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2019 Mar 13;9(1):e10
pubmed: 31333900
Pain Rep. 2019 Apr 05;4(3):e736
pubmed: 31583351
Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Nov 14;50(1):86-95
pubmed: 31731333
Pain Med. 2017 Sep 01;18(9):1631-1641
pubmed: 28431129
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):62-68
pubmed: 27875368

Auteurs

Alaa Abd-Elsayed (A)

University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Anesthesiology, Madison, WI, USA.

Natalie Strand (N)

Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Karina Gritsenko (K)

Montefiore Multidisciplinary Pain Program, Bronx, NY, USA.

Joshua Martens (J)

University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Anesthesiology, Madison, WI, USA.

Krishnan Chakravarthy (K)

University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Dawood Sayed (D)

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Timothy Deer (T)

The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.

Classifications MeSH