A Meta-Overview and Bibliometric Analysis of Resilience in Spatial Planning - the Relevance of Place-Based Approaches.
Bibliometric
Citation link
Place-based policies
Planning
Resilience
Spatial
Territorial
Text mining
Journal
Applied spatial analysis and policy
ISSN: 1874-463X
Titre abrégé: Appl Spat Anal Policy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101631768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Apr 2022
23 Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
24
05
2021
accepted:
04
04
2022
entrez:
2
5
2022
pubmed:
3
5
2022
medline:
3
5
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study offers a literature review and bibliometric analysis aiming to enhance our understanding of the actual contribution of resilience approaches to spatial and territorial development and planning studies. Using citation link-based clustering and statistical text-mining techniques (in terms of prevalence of topics, over time, extraction of relevant terms, keywords frequencies), our study maps scientific domains that include the spatial dimension of resilience thinking. It offers a systematic assessment of modern approaches by connecting profoundly theoretical views to more instrumental and policy-oriented approaches. Firstly, the theoretical background of spatial resilience used in numerous studies in various fields is analysed from the viewpoint of the type of embedded resilience (engineering, ecological, social-ecological, economic, social etc.). Secondly, we review and discuss the significance of three main and consistent research directions in terms of different scales and political/institutional contexts that matter from the viewpoint of spatial and territorial planning. Our findings show that spatial resilience debates are far from being settled, as according to many scientists, resilience measurements are often based on technical-reductionist frameworks that cannot comprehensively reflect the complex systems and issues they address. Our conclusions highlight the necessity of a harmonized framework and integrated perspective on resilience in sustainable territorial planning and development, in both theoretical and empirical contexts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35495415
doi: 10.1007/s12061-022-09449-z
pii: 9449
pmc: PMC9033936
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1-31Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests (Include Appropriate Disclosures)Not applicable.
Références
Br J Surg. 2021 Sep 27;108(9):1056-1063
pubmed: 33761533
MethodsX. 2020 Jul 03;7:100984
pubmed: 32728527
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7718):360-364
pubmed: 30111788
Ambio. 2003 Sep;32(6):389-96
pubmed: 14627367
Oecologia. 1997 Feb;109(3):323-334
pubmed: 28307528
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13785-13790
pubmed: 27849580
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Oct 1;15(10):413-417
pubmed: 10998519
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Feb;23(2):891-905
pubmed: 27334054
For Ecol Manage. 2017 Mar 15;388:120-131
pubmed: 28860677
Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):334-41
pubmed: 17841250
J Anim Ecol. 2017 May;86(3):662-673
pubmed: 28093769
PeerJ. 2020 Feb 11;8:e8533
pubmed: 32095358
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 15;708:135159
pubmed: 31810672