Quality Over Volume: Modeling Centralization of Gastric Cancer Resections in Italy.
Hospitals, high-volume
Quality of health care
Stomach neoplasms
Surgical oncology
Journal
Journal of gastric cancer
ISSN: 2093-582X
Titre abrégé: J Gastric Cancer
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101559430
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
02
10
2021
revised:
03
02
2022
accepted:
04
02
2022
entrez:
15
4
2022
pubmed:
16
4
2022
medline:
16
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The correlation between hospital volume and postoperative outcomes has led to the centralization of complex procedures in several countries. However, the results reported in relation to gastric cancer (GC) are contradictory. This study aimed to analyze GC surgical volumes and 30-day postoperative mortality in Italy and to provide a simulation for modeling centralization of GC resections based on district case volumes. A national registry was used to identify all GC resections, record mortality rates, and track the national in-border GC resection health travel. Hospitals were grouped according to caseload. Centralization of all GC procedures performed within the same district was modeled. The outcome measures were a minimal volume of 25 GC resections/year and the 30-day postoperative mortality. In 2018, 5,873 GC resections were performed in 498 Italian hospitals (mean resections per hospital per year: 11.8); the postoperative mortality rate (5.51%) was tracked from 2016-2018. GC resection health travel ranged from 2% to 50.5%, with a significant (P<0.001) difference between northern and central/southern Italy. The mean mortality rate was 7.7% in hospitals performing one to 3 GC resections per year, compared with 4.7% in those with >17 GC resections/year (P≤0.01). Most Italian districts achieved 25 procedures/year after centralization; however, 66.3% of GC cases in southern Italy vs. 42.2% in central and 52.7% in the northern regions (P<0.001) required reallocation. Postoperative mortality after GC resection correlated with hospital volume. Despite health travel, most Italian districts can reach a high-volume threshold, but discrepancies in mortality rates are alarming.Trial Registration
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The correlation between hospital volume and postoperative outcomes has led to the centralization of complex procedures in several countries. However, the results reported in relation to gastric cancer (GC) are contradictory. This study aimed to analyze GC surgical volumes and 30-day postoperative mortality in Italy and to provide a simulation for modeling centralization of GC resections based on district case volumes.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A national registry was used to identify all GC resections, record mortality rates, and track the national in-border GC resection health travel. Hospitals were grouped according to caseload. Centralization of all GC procedures performed within the same district was modeled. The outcome measures were a minimal volume of 25 GC resections/year and the 30-day postoperative mortality.
Results
UNASSIGNED
In 2018, 5,873 GC resections were performed in 498 Italian hospitals (mean resections per hospital per year: 11.8); the postoperative mortality rate (5.51%) was tracked from 2016-2018. GC resection health travel ranged from 2% to 50.5%, with a significant (P<0.001) difference between northern and central/southern Italy. The mean mortality rate was 7.7% in hospitals performing one to 3 GC resections per year, compared with 4.7% in those with >17 GC resections/year (P≤0.01). Most Italian districts achieved 25 procedures/year after centralization; however, 66.3% of GC cases in southern Italy vs. 42.2% in central and 52.7% in the northern regions (P<0.001) required reallocation.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Postoperative mortality after GC resection correlated with hospital volume. Despite health travel, most Italian districts can reach a high-volume threshold, but discrepancies in mortality rates are alarming.Trial Registration
Identifiants
pubmed: 35425653
doi: 10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e4
pmc: PMC8980598
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
35-46Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Korean Gastric Cancer Association.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Références
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;20(2):381-98
pubmed: 23054104
N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 20;301(25):1364-9
pubmed: 503167
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct 1;26(28):4626-33
pubmed: 18574159
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128
pubmed: 29205995
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Aug;217(2):336-46.e1
pubmed: 23628227
Br J Surg. 2018 May;105(6):728-735
pubmed: 29652082
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(7):1004-13
pubmed: 22456179
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;37(4):325-33
pubmed: 21296543
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:166-206
pubmed: 5338568
Ann Surg. 2009 Feb;249(2):256-61
pubmed: 19212179
Dig Surg. 2012;29(5):374-83
pubmed: 23128369
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;42(12):1873-1880
pubmed: 27624916
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1172-1177
pubmed: 27280507
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):692-7
pubmed: 26501706
Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;5(1):204
pubmed: 27899141
Br J Surg. 2020 Oct;107(11):1510-1519
pubmed: 32592514
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0183955
pubmed: 29073140
J Surg Oncol. 2017 May;115(6):738-745
pubmed: 28505401
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):865-871
pubmed: 31706867
Br J Surg. 2018 Dec;105(13):1807-1815
pubmed: 30132789
J Gastric Cancer. 2017 Sep;17(3):246-254
pubmed: 28970955