Modelling Patient Behaviour Using IoT Sensor Data: a Case Study to Evaluate Techniques for Modelling Domestic Behaviour in Recovery from Total Hip Replacement Surgery.
Actigraphy
Hip replacement surgery
Indoor localisation
Internet of things
Mobility
Sleep
Wearable sensors
Journal
Journal of healthcare informatics research
ISSN: 2509-4971
Titre abrégé: J Healthc Inform Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101707451
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
11
12
2018
revised:
21
02
2020
accepted:
26
02
2020
entrez:
13
4
2022
pubmed:
3
5
2020
medline:
3
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The UK health service sees around 160,000 total hip or knee replacements every year and this number is expected to rise with an ageing population. Expectations of surgical outcomes are changing alongside demographic trends, whilst aftercare may be fractured as a result of resource limitations. Conventional assessments of health outcomes must evolve to keep up with these changing trends. Health outcomes may be assessed largely by self-report using Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), such as the Oxford Hip or Oxford Knee Score, in the months up to and following surgery. Though widely used, many PROMs have methodological limitations and there is debate about how to interpret results and definitions of clinically meaningful change. With the development of a home-monitoring system, there is opportunity to characterise the relationship between PROMs and behaviour in a natural setting and to develop methods of passive monitoring of outcome and recovery after surgery. In this paper, we discuss the motivation and technology used in long-term continuous observation of movement, sleep and domestic routine for healthcare applications, such as the HEmiSPHERE project for hip and knee replacement patients. In this case study, we evaluate trends evident in data of two patients, collected over a 3-month observation period post-surgery, by comparison with scores from PROMs for sleep and movement quality, and by comparison with a third control home. We find that accelerometer and indoor localisation data correctly highlight long-term trends in sleep and movement quality and can be used to predict sleep and wake times and measure sleep and wake routine variance over time, whilst indoor localisation provides context for the domestic routine and mobility of the patient. Finally, we discuss a visual method of sharing findings with healthcare professionals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35415449
doi: 10.1007/s41666-020-00072-6
pii: 72
pmc: PMC8982732
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
238-260Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 22;2(1):e000435
pubmed: 22357571
Sleep Sci. 2014 Sep;7(3):158-64
pubmed: 26483921
Res Vet Sci. 2012 Aug;93(1):412-6
pubmed: 21924751
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):185-90
pubmed: 8666621
Sleep. 2003 May 1;26(3):342-92
pubmed: 12749557
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Mar 07;17(3):
pubmed: 28272362
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10
pubmed: 12777182
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2013 May;17(3):579-90
pubmed: 24592460
Biometrics. 2016 Jun;72(2):513-24
pubmed: 26288278
MethodsX. 2016 May 24;3:430-5
pubmed: 27294030
Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213
pubmed: 2748771
Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1076-81
pubmed: 26224824
PM R. 2011 Jun;3(6):541-9; quiz 549
pubmed: 21665167
Physiol Meas. 2012 Nov;33(11):1947-58
pubmed: 23110821
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Mar;94(3):412-8
pubmed: 22371552
Knee. 2011 Oct;18(5):306-11
pubmed: 20817472
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:639142
pubmed: 25143988
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 28;8(7):e021862
pubmed: 30056388