Factors affecting image magnification in indirect ophthalmoscopy with Volk or similar lenses and a biomicroscope.

Volk lenses ametropia equivalent power indirect ophthalmoscopy magnification working distance

Journal

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)
ISSN: 1475-1313
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8208839

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2022
Historique:
revised: 04 03 2022
received: 22 12 2021
accepted: 06 03 2022
pubmed: 8 4 2022
medline: 9 6 2022
entrez: 7 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To explore the factors affecting the linear magnification of the intermediate fundus image during indirect ophthalmoscopy with a slit-lamp biomicroscope. A simple paraxial model, based on a 'reduced' eye and a 'thin' ophthalmoscopy lens, is used to develop equations showing the effects of the power and ametropia of the eye, and the equivalent power and position of the ophthalmoscopy lens on fundus magnification. Predicted magnifications are compared with practical results found in earlier published experimental studies, which used Volk ophthalmoscopy lenses in conjunction with physical model eyes with adjustable levels of axial ametropia. The model's magnification predictions, as a function of the eye's ametropia, are in good agreement with previous experimental measurements, provided that the equivalent powers of the Volk lenses are used rather than their labelled nominal powers. Magnification values typically change by approximately ±10% over the practical range of each parameter if other parameters are held constant. In particular, normal variations in the equivalent power of the adult emmetropic eye result in magnifications which range from about 90-120% of the nominal value given for an eye power of +60.00 D. It is demonstrated that the recommended working distances for different powers of Volk ophthalmoscopy lenses approximate optimal matching between the various pupils of the eye-Volk lens-slit-lamp biomicroscope system. All the parameters considered have marked effects on magnification. The magnification values quoted by manufacturers can be regarded as only approximations of those which may be found in practice. Better estimates of magnification can be obtained by inserting the appropriate parameter values into the equations derived in this paper, using, where appropriate, the equivalent power of the indirect ophthalmoscopy lens, rather than the lens' labelled, 'nominal' power.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35390185
doi: 10.1111/opo.12983
pmc: PMC9321138
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

717-729

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.

Références

Spec Rep Ser Med Res Counc (G B). 1957;11(293):1-69
pubmed: 13399546
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Jan;42(1):153-7
pubmed: 11133860
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1965 Jun;5:471-94
pubmed: 14328348
Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Sep;110(9):1303-8
pubmed: 1520121
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0210387
pubmed: 30615674
Arch Ophthal. 1950 Feb;43(2):330-6
pubmed: 15409739
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Mar 1;58(3):1858-1864
pubmed: 28358953
Ophthalmologica. 1972;164(2):143-8
pubmed: 5024480
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8(1):53-9
pubmed: 3047630
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992 Oct;12(4):485-90
pubmed: 1293539
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 Jul;42(4):717-729
pubmed: 35390185
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Jan;62(1):19-24
pubmed: 3976831
Surv Ophthalmol. 1992 May-Jun;36(6):439-45
pubmed: 1589859
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Nov 20;55(12):8353-8
pubmed: 25414183
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1982 Apr;180(4):286-9
pubmed: 7087358
AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1951 Nov;46(5):565-83
pubmed: 14868087
Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jun;82(6):643-9
pubmed: 9797665
Eur Neurol. 2009;61(4):244-9
pubmed: 19182487
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982 Jul;59(7):595-601
pubmed: 7124899
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Jun;43(6):1817-9
pubmed: 12036984
Br J Ophthalmol. 1990 Mar;74(3):177-9
pubmed: 2322517
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1994 Jun;232(6):361-7
pubmed: 8082844
Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Mar;73(3):235-6
pubmed: 2706215
Br J Ophthalmol. 1953 Oct;37(10):625-8
pubmed: 13093940
N Z Med J. 2020 Apr 3;133(1512):31-38
pubmed: 32242176
Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 May;78(5):363-4
pubmed: 8025070

Auteurs

Amit Navin Jinabhai (AN)

Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

W Neil Charman (WN)

Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH