Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor.

Johnson–Cook model auxetic sandwich composite finite element analysis monolithic armor plates silicon carbide ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 30 12 2021
revised: 25 01 2022
accepted: 05 02 2022
entrez: 25 3 2022
pubmed: 26 3 2022
medline: 26 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In this study, the ballistic impact behavior of auxetic sandwich composite human body armor was analyzed using finite element analysis. The auxetic core of the armor was composed of discrete re-entrant unit cells. The sandwich armor structure consisted of a front panel of aluminum alloy (Al 7075-T6), UHMWPE (sandwich core), and a back facet of silicon carbide (SiC) bonded together with epoxy resin. Numerical simulations were run on Explicit Dynamics/Autodyne 3-D code. Various projectile velocities with the same boundary conditions were used to predict the auxetic armor response. These results were compared with those of conventional monolithic body armor. The results showed improved indentation resistance with the auxetic armor. Deformation in auxetic armor was observed greater for each of the cases when compared to the monolithic armor, due to higher energy absorption. The elastic energy dissipation results in the lower indentation in an auxetic armor. The armor can be used safely up to 400 m/s; being used at higher velocities significantly reduced the threat level. Conversely, the conventional monolithic modal does not allow the projectile to pass through at a velocity below 300 m/s; however, the back face becomes severely damaged at 200 m/s. At a velocity of 400 m/s, the front facet of auxetic armor was destroyed; however, the back facet was completely safe, while the monolithic panel did not withstand this velocity and was completely damaged. The results are encouraging in terms of resistance offered by the newly adopted auxetic armor compared to conventional monolithic armor.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35329516
pii: ma15062064
doi: 10.3390/ma15062064
pmc: PMC8950186
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Nat Mater. 2011 Oct 24;10(11):823-37
pubmed: 22020006
Polymers (Basel). 2020 Jan 07;12(1):
pubmed: 31936184
Polymers (Basel). 2020 Jun 09;12(6):
pubmed: 32526842

Auteurs

Imtiaz Alam Shah (IA)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.

Rafiullah Khan (R)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.

Seyed Saeid Rahimian Koloor (SSR)

Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation (CXI), Technical University of Liberec (TUL), Studentska 2, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.

Michal Petrů (M)

Technical University of Liberec (TUL), Studentska 2, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.

Saeed Badshah (S)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.

Sajjad Ahmad (S)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.

Muhammad Amjad (M)

Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.

Classifications MeSH