Nanoinhibitory Impacts of Salicylic Acid, Glycyrrhizic Acid Ammonium Salt, and Boric Acid Nanoparticles against Phytoplasma Associated with Faba Bean.

boric acid faba bean glycyrrhizic acid ammonium salt nanoparticles phytoplasma pods yield salicylic acid

Journal

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1420-3049
Titre abrégé: Molecules
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100964009

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 17 01 2022
revised: 13 02 2022
accepted: 16 02 2022
entrez: 10 3 2022
pubmed: 11 3 2022
medline: 24 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Phytoplasmas are economically important plant pathogenic bacterial diseases, causing severe yield losses worldwide. In this study, we tested nanoformulations such as glycyrrhizic acid ammonium salt (GAS), salicylic acid (SA), and boric acid (BA) as novel antimicrobial agents inducing the resistance against the phytoplasma disease in faba bean. The nanoparticles (NP) were foliar-applied to naturally phytoplasma-infected faba bean with three concentrations from each of SA, GAS, and BA, under field conditions. Nested PCR (using universal primer pairs P1/P7 and R16F2n/R16R2) were reacted positively with all symptomatic samples and gave a product size of approximately 1200 bp, while the healthy plant gave no results. Transmission electron microscopy examinations of phytoplasma-infected faba bean plants treated with different nanoparticles revealed that severe damage occurred in phytoplasma particle's structure, degradation, malformation, lysis in the cell membrane, and the cytoplasmic leakage followed by complete lysis of phytoplasma cells. Exogenous application of GAS-NP (1.68 µM), SA-NP (0.28 µM), and BA-NP (0.124 µM) suppressed the infection percentage of phytoplasma by 75%, 50%, and 20%, and the disease severity by 84%, 64%, and 54%, respectively. Foliar application of nanoparticles improved Fv/Fm (maximum quantum efficiency of PSII Photochemistry), PI (the performance index), SPAD chlorophyll (the relative chlorophyll content), shoots height, and leaves number, thus inducing recovery of the plant biomass and green pods yield. The most effective treatment was GAS-NP at 1.68 µM that mediated substantial increases in the shoots' fresh weight, shoots' dry weight, number of pods per plant, and green pods yield by 230%, 244%, 202% and 178%, respectively, compared to those of infected plants not sprayed with nanoparticles. This study demonstrated the utility of using nanoparticles, particularly GAS-NP at 1.68 µM to suppress the phytoplasma infection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35268567
pii: molecules27051467
doi: 10.3390/molecules27051467
pmc: PMC8911656
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

PLoS One. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):e0165831
pubmed: 27820854
Front Microbiol. 2015 May 13;6:453
pubmed: 26029190
Nature. 2004 Feb 26;427(6977):858-61
pubmed: 14985766
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013 Nov;65(13-14):1803-15
pubmed: 23892192
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Jul;54(1):243-6
pubmed: 15190039
Plants (Basel). 2021 Apr 11;10(4):
pubmed: 33920494
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Jun 30;6:462
pubmed: 26175738
Front Biosci. 2007 Jan 01;12:673-89
pubmed: 17127328
Environ Pollut. 2000 Sep;109(3):501-7
pubmed: 15092883
Iran J Immunol. 2010 Jun;7(2):65-73
pubmed: 20574119
J Exp Bot. 2000 Apr;51(345):659-68
pubmed: 10938857
Science. 1997 Feb 21;275(5303):1129-32
pubmed: 9027314
Plant Dis. 2002 May;86(5):477-484
pubmed: 30818669
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 01;11:664380
pubmed: 33869067
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 27;10:1349
pubmed: 31316474
Phytother Res. 2013 Jun;27(6):841-6
pubmed: 22899320
Nature. 1979 Oct 25;281(5733):689-90
pubmed: 233133
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2009;47:177-206
pubmed: 19400653
Plant Cell. 1992 Mar;4(3):359-366
pubmed: 12297650
Plant Dis. 2002 Jun;86(6):676-681
pubmed: 30823244
Mol Plant Pathol. 2008 Jul;9(4):403-23
pubmed: 18705857
J Control Release. 2011 Dec 10;156(2):128-45
pubmed: 21763369
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jun;62(10):3321-38
pubmed: 21357767
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2015 Jul;5(4):310-5
pubmed: 26579460
Plant Sci. 2014 Nov;228:127-34
pubmed: 25438793
Food Chem. 2013 Nov 15;141(2):1063-71
pubmed: 23790887
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Feb;63(2):325-36
pubmed: 19059942
J Environ Biol. 2013 Sep;34(5):837-40
pubmed: 24558795
Front Microbiol. 2017 Apr 06;8:611
pubmed: 28428782

Auteurs

Eman A Ahmed (EA)

Virus and Phytoplasma Research Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza 12619, Egypt.

Tahsin Shoala (T)

Environmental Biotechnology Department, College of Biotechnology, Misr University for Science and Technology, Giza 12563, Egypt.

Abdelsattar Abdelkhalik (A)

Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt.

Hoda A S El-Garhy (HAS)

Genetics and Genetic Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Qalyubia 13736, Egypt.

Ismail A Ismail (IA)

Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.

Amro A Farrag (AA)

Virus and Phytoplasma Research Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza 12619, Egypt.

Articles similaires

Beta vulgaris Europe Plant Diseases Phytoplasma Phloem

Comprehensive analysis of little leaf disease incidence and resistance in eggplant.

Muthusamy Karthikeyan, Gawande Priya Yogiraj, Thiyagarajan Elaiyabharathi et al.
1.00
Solanum melongena Plant Diseases Phytoplasma Disease Resistance Plant Leaves
Animals Hemiptera Glutamate-Ammonia Ligase Phytoplasma Plant Leaves

Classifications MeSH