Multi-institutional expert update on the use of laparoscopic bile duct exploration in the management of choledocholithiasis: Lesson learned from 3950 procedures.
bile duct exploration
biliary tract
cystic duct
laparoscopy
lithiasis
Journal
Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
ISSN: 1868-6982
Titre abrégé: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101528587
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
revised:
20
12
2021
received:
14
07
2021
accepted:
21
12
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2022
medline:
24
12
2022
entrez:
5
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently there has been a growing interest in the laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones with gallbladder in situ (LBDE), which is favoring the expansion of this technique. Our study identified the standardization factors of LBDE and its implementation in the single-stage management of choledocholithiasis. A retrospective multi-institutional study among 17 centers with proven experience in LBDE was performed. A cross-sectional survey consisting of a semi-structured pretested questionnaire was distributed covering the main aspects on the use of LBDE in the management of choledocholithiasis. A total of 3950 LBDEs were analyzed. The most frequent indication was jaundice (58.8%). LBDEs were performed after failed ERCP in 15.2%. The most common approach used was the transcystic (63.11%). The overall series failure rate of LBDE was 4% and the median rate for each center was 6% (IQR, 4.5-12.5). Median operative time ranged between 60-120 min (70.6%). Overall morbidity rate was 14.6%, with a postoperative bile leak and complications ≥3a rate of 4.5% and 2.5%, respectively. The operative time decreased with experience (P = .03) and length of hospital stay was longer in the presence of a biliary leak (P = .04). Current training of LBDE was defined as poor or very poor by 82.4%. Based on this multicenter survey, LBDE is a safe and effective approach when performed by experienced teams. The generalization of LBDE will be based on developing training programs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recently there has been a growing interest in the laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones with gallbladder in situ (LBDE), which is favoring the expansion of this technique. Our study identified the standardization factors of LBDE and its implementation in the single-stage management of choledocholithiasis.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective multi-institutional study among 17 centers with proven experience in LBDE was performed. A cross-sectional survey consisting of a semi-structured pretested questionnaire was distributed covering the main aspects on the use of LBDE in the management of choledocholithiasis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 3950 LBDEs were analyzed. The most frequent indication was jaundice (58.8%). LBDEs were performed after failed ERCP in 15.2%. The most common approach used was the transcystic (63.11%). The overall series failure rate of LBDE was 4% and the median rate for each center was 6% (IQR, 4.5-12.5). Median operative time ranged between 60-120 min (70.6%). Overall morbidity rate was 14.6%, with a postoperative bile leak and complications ≥3a rate of 4.5% and 2.5%, respectively. The operative time decreased with experience (P = .03) and length of hospital stay was longer in the presence of a biliary leak (P = .04). Current training of LBDE was defined as poor or very poor by 82.4%.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Based on this multicenter survey, LBDE is a safe and effective approach when performed by experienced teams. The generalization of LBDE will be based on developing training programs.
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1283-1291Informations de copyright
© 2022 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
Références
O'Conor J. The surgical treatment of cholelithiasis, cholecystectomy and choledochotomy: continuous out-door treatment. Ann Surg. 1922;76(2):201-4.
Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P, Prabhu M. A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(8):1986-9.
Martinez-Isla A, Navaratne L. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration. In: Isla A, Navaratne L, editors. 1st ed. London: Springer; 2022. In press.
Zhu J, Li G, Du P, Zhou X, Xiao W, Li Y. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(3):997-1005.
Warttig S, Ward S, Rogers G. Diagnosis and management of gallstone disease: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014;349:g6241.
Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, Anderloni A, Arvanitakis M, Ah-Soune P, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2019;51(5):472-91.
Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, Norton S, Thompson M. A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(6):713-20.
Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study. Minerva Chir. 2002;57(4):467-74.
Quaresima S, Balla A, Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, Lezoche E, Paganini AM. A 23 year experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(1):29-35.
Asbun HJ, Abu Hilal M, Kunzler F, Asbun D, Bonjer J, Conlon K, et al. International Delphi Expert Consensus on Safe Return to Surgical and Endoscopic Practice: from the Coronavirus Global Surgical Collaborative. Ann Surg. 2021;274(1):50-6.
Narula VK, Fung EC, Overby DW, Richardson W, Stefanidis D. Clinical spotlight review for the management of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1482-91.
Zhu JG, Han W, Guo W, Su W, Bai ZG, Zhang ZT. Learning curve and outcome of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg. 2015;102(13):1691-7.
Bekheit M, Smith R, Ramsay G, Soggiu F, Ghazanfar M, Ahmed I. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic transcystic versus transcholedochal common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. BJS Open. 2019;3(3):242-51.
Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Sarma DR, Balakrishnan S, Eltair M, Mankotia R, et al. Laparoscopic transcystic versus transductal common bile duct exploration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2019;43(8):1935-48.
Tokumura H, Umezawa A, Cao H, Sakamoto N, Imaoka Y, Ouchi A, et al. Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9(2):206-12.
Hongjun H, Yong J, Baoqiang W. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: choledochotomy versus transcystic approach? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015;25(3):218-22.
Navaratne L, Al-Musawi J, Martinez IA. Comment on conventional surgical management of bile duct stones: a service model and outcomes of 1318 laparoscopic explorations Ann Surg 2021;274(6):e901-2.
Nassar AHM, Gough V, Ng HJ, Katbeh T, Khan K. Utilisation of laparoscopic choledochoscopy during bile duct exploration and evaluation of the wiper blade manoeuvre for transcystic intrahepatic access. Ann Surg. 2021.
Jorba R, Pavel MC, Llàcer-Millán E, Estalella L, Achalandabaso M, Julià-Verdaguer E, et al. Contemporary management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: a survey of Spanish surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(9):5024-33.
Pan L, Chen M, Ji L, Zheng L, Yan P, Fang J, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: an up-to-date meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018;268(2):247-53.
Singh AN, Kilambi R. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(9):3763-76.
Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Li T, Cheng B, Jin X. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3275-86.
Nagaraja V, Eslick GD, Cox MR. Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive techniques for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21(12):896-901.
Matsubayashi H, Fukutomi A, Kanemoto H, Maeda A, Matsunaga K, Uesaka K, et al. Risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic biliary drainage. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(3):222-8.
Ricci C, Pagano N, Taffurelli G, Pacilio CA, Migliori M, Bazzoli F, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of 4 combinations of laparoscopic and intraoperative techniques for management of gallstone disease with biliary duct calculi: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(7):e181167.
Parra-Membrives P, Martínez-Baena D, Lorente-Herce J, Jiménez-Riera G. Comparative study of three bile duct closure methods following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(2):145-51.
Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR. T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(6):CD005641.
Martínez Cecilia D, Valentí Azcárate V, Qurashi K, García Agustí A, Martínez IA. Advantages of laparoscopic stented choledochorrhaphy. Six years experience. Cir Esp. 2008;84(2):78-82.
Warner RL, Coleman KC, Musgrove KA, Bardes JM, Borgstrom DC, Grabo DJ. A review of general surgery resident experience in common bile duct exploration in the ERCP era. Am J Surg. 2020;220(4):899-904.
Brewer JO, Navaratne L, Marchington SW, Martínez Cecilia D, Quiñones Sampedro J, et al. Porcine Aorto-Renal Artery (PARA) model for laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: the evolution of a training model to meet new clinical needs. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(4):1149-54.