Evaluation of low-dose aspirin in the prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm labour (the APRIL study): A multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.


Journal

PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2022
Historique:
received: 23 06 2021
accepted: 14 12 2021
entrez: 1 2 2022
pubmed: 2 2 2022
medline: 11 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. We performed a parallel multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (the APRIL study). The study was performed in 8 tertiary and 26 secondary care hospitals in the Netherlands. We included women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm birth of a singleton between 22 and 37 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to aspirin 80 mg daily or placebo initiated between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or delivery. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using sequentially numbered medication containers. Participants, their healthcare providers, and researchers were blinded for treatment allocation. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neonatal outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia > grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2, necrotising enterocolitis > stage 1, retinopathy of prematurity, culture proven sepsis, or perinatal death). Analyses were performed by intention to treat. From May 31, 2016 to June 13, 2019, 406 women were randomised to aspirin (n = 204) or placebo (n = 202). A total of 387 women (81.1% of white ethnic origin, mean age 32.5 ± SD 3.8) were included in the final analysis: 194 women were allocated to aspirin and 193 to placebo. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 41 (21.2%) women in the aspirin group and 49 (25.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.20, p = 0.32). In women with ≥80% medication adherence, preterm birth occurred in 24 (19.2%) versus 30 (24.8%) women (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25, p = 0.29). The rate of the composite of poor neonatal outcome was 4.6% (n = 9) versus 2.6% (n = 5) (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.25, p = 0.29). Among all randomised women, serious adverse events occurred in 11 out of 204 (5.4%) women allocated to aspirin and 11 out of 202 (5.4%) women allocated to placebo. None of these serious adverse events was considered to be associated with treatment allocation. The main study limitation is the underpowered sample size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates. In this study, we observed that low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. However, a modest reduction of preterm birth with aspirin cannot be ruled out. Further research is required to determine a possible beneficial effect of low-dose aspirin for women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. Dutch Trial Register (NL5553, NTR5675) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5553.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The recurrence rate of spontaneous preterm birth is high, and additional preventive measures are required. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of low-dose aspirin compared to placebo in the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We performed a parallel multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (the APRIL study). The study was performed in 8 tertiary and 26 secondary care hospitals in the Netherlands. We included women with a singleton pregnancy and a history of spontaneous preterm birth of a singleton between 22 and 37 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to aspirin 80 mg daily or placebo initiated between 8 and 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or delivery. Randomisation was computer generated, with allocation concealment by using sequentially numbered medication containers. Participants, their healthcare providers, and researchers were blinded for treatment allocation. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes included a composite of poor neonatal outcome (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, periventricular leukomalacia > grade 1, intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2, necrotising enterocolitis > stage 1, retinopathy of prematurity, culture proven sepsis, or perinatal death). Analyses were performed by intention to treat. From May 31, 2016 to June 13, 2019, 406 women were randomised to aspirin (n = 204) or placebo (n = 202). A total of 387 women (81.1% of white ethnic origin, mean age 32.5 ± SD 3.8) were included in the final analysis: 194 women were allocated to aspirin and 193 to placebo. Preterm birth <37 weeks occurred in 41 (21.2%) women in the aspirin group and 49 (25.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.20, p = 0.32). In women with ≥80% medication adherence, preterm birth occurred in 24 (19.2%) versus 30 (24.8%) women (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.25, p = 0.29). The rate of the composite of poor neonatal outcome was 4.6% (n = 9) versus 2.6% (n = 5) (RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.61 to 5.25, p = 0.29). Among all randomised women, serious adverse events occurred in 11 out of 204 (5.4%) women allocated to aspirin and 11 out of 202 (5.4%) women allocated to placebo. None of these serious adverse events was considered to be associated with treatment allocation. The main study limitation is the underpowered sample size due to the lower than expected preterm birth rates.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we observed that low-dose aspirin did not significantly reduce the preterm birth rate in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. However, a modest reduction of preterm birth with aspirin cannot be ruled out. Further research is required to determine a possible beneficial effect of low-dose aspirin for women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Dutch Trial Register (NL5553, NTR5675) https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5553.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35104279
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003892
pii: PMEDICINE-D-21-02759
pmc: PMC8806064
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aspirin R16CO5Y76E

Banques de données

NTR
['NL5553', 'NTR5675']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1003892

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: BM reported an Investigator grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; grant no. GNT1176437); receipt of research funding from Guerbet; and is a former advisory board member at ObsEva. All other authors do not report any relevant financial activities outside the submitted work.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 6;352(1):9-19
pubmed: 15635108
J Perinatol. 2016 Jun;36(6):427-31
pubmed: 26890552
Lancet. 2020 Jan 25;395(10220):285-293
pubmed: 31982074
BJOG. 2013 Jan;120(1):15-22
pubmed: 23078194
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):327-336
pubmed: 28079785
Pediatr Res. 2019 Nov;86(5):567-572
pubmed: 31398720
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 5;7(6):e015402
pubmed: 28679674
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):223
pubmed: 28705190
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;125(4):876-884
pubmed: 25751215
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):685.e1-685.e5
pubmed: 28888591
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):383.e1-383.e17
pubmed: 30576661
Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84
pubmed: 18177778
Hypertension. 2020 Apr;75(4):1125-1132
pubmed: 32114852
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;219(4):399.e1-399.e6
pubmed: 29913174
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):613-622
pubmed: 28657417
Placenta. 2016 Dec;48:56-62
pubmed: 27871473
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 30;2019(10):
pubmed: 31684684
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jan;7(1):e37-e46
pubmed: 30389451
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):287-293.e1
pubmed: 29138036
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):49-58
pubmed: 26646133
BJOG. 2006 Dec;113 Suppl 3:17-42
pubmed: 17206962
BMJ. 2012 Dec 04;345:e7961
pubmed: 23212880
Early Hum Dev. 1999 Jan;53(3):193-218
pubmed: 10088988
Ann Intern Med. 2014 May 20;160(10):695-703
pubmed: 24711050
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 12;348(24):2379-85
pubmed: 12802023

Auteurs

Anadeijda J E M C Landman (AJEMC)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Marjon A de Boer (MA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Laura Visser (L)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Tobias A J Nijman (TAJ)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, the Netherlands.

Marieke A C Hemels (MAC)

Department of Neonatal Intensive Care, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.

Christiana N Naaktgeboren (CN)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Marijke C van der Weide (MC)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Ben W Mol (BW)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Judith O E H van Laar (JOEH)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.

Dimitri N M Papatsonis (DNM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.

Mireille N Bekker (MN)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Joris van Drongelen (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Mariëlle G van Pampus (MG)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Marieke Sueters (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.

David P van der Ham (DP)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.

J Marko Sikkema (JM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Group Twente Almelo, Almelo, the Netherlands.

Joost J Zwart (JJ)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands.

Anjoke J M Huisjes (AJM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gelre Hospitals Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.

Marloes E van Huizen (ME)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, the Netherlands.

Gunilla Kleiverda (G)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flevo Hospital Almere, Almere, the Netherlands.

Janine Boon (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Maureen T M Franssen (MTM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Wietske Hermes (W)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, the Netherlands.

Harry Visser (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tergooi Hospitals, Hilversum, the Netherlands.

Christianne J M de Groot (CJM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Martijn A Oudijk (MA)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH