Applicant Ranking Criteria in Adult Reconstruction Fellowship: Your Interview Counts When Applying for Fellowship.

adult reconstruction arthroplasty continued medical education fellowship match interview

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
accepted: 23 12 2021
entrez: 1 2 2022
pubmed: 2 2 2022
medline: 2 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background The criteria for successful ranking in the fellowship match remains unclear. Although some data are available regarding the qualities sought after in medical students for the residency match, little information is available regarding the fellowship match. In this study, for arthroplasty applications to our institution, the interview was hypothesized to be the most important factor for ranking, with little impact from other commonly assessed variables. Methodology All 40 applicants who applied for fellowship were selected to interview for the 2017 Brown University Comprehensive Adult Reconstruction Fellowship and were evaluated on the interview, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, letters of recommendation, personal statement, extracurricular activities, research, and caliber of undergraduate institution, medical school, and residency program. The interview score was based on a combined score of individual components of personality, program fit, and research. Results Of the 40 applicants who were interviewed, eight did not match. The interview score was the only statistically significant variable and had the highest correlation with ranking (r = 0.92). Moreover, extracurricular activities correlated with a higher ranking whereas USMLE Step 1/Step 2 scores had a relatively low correlation (r = 0.32 and 0.29, respectively). Recommendation letters and caliber of medical school, undergraduate education, and residency demonstrated low correlations. The personal statement and research components had the lowest correlations. Conclusions The combined interview score, in particular the personality and program fit components, was the most important determinant of successful ranking at our institution. Because all 40 applicants who applied for an arthroplasty fellowship at our institution were selected for an interview, there was no pre-interview selection bias that would confound these results. However, the ranking does not correlate with an applicant's success in fellowship, and further research is required to determine the qualifications of a successful surgeon.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35103200
doi: 10.7759/cureus.20636
pmc: PMC8783569
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e20636

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021, Patel et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Arthroplasty. 2010 Dec;25(8):1175-81
pubmed: 20870384
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 20;97(10):869-75
pubmed: 25995502
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Nov;91(11):2750-5
pubmed: 19884456
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 4;96(11):e94
pubmed: 24897751
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Nov;44(11):E444-53
pubmed: 26566560
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Sep-Oct;26(5):357-9
pubmed: 20592634
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):961-968.e1
pubmed: 21130602
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1375-84
pubmed: 18519333
Orthopedics. 2015 Mar;38(3):175-9
pubmed: 25760497
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Nov 09;5(11):2325967117736726
pubmed: 29164161
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jul;90(7):1598-605
pubmed: 18594111
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Jun;6(2):218-21
pubmed: 24949124
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Nov 1;99(21):e114
pubmed: 29088046
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Feb;19(2):72-80
pubmed: 21292930
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003 Jun;19(3):157-61
pubmed: 12813299
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;119(1):119-24
pubmed: 22183219
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Mar;21(3):349-52
pubmed: 19921081
Laryngoscope. 2015 Nov;125(11):2543-6
pubmed: 26152867
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Oct 16;95(20):e154
pubmed: 24132369
Orthopedics. 2012 Apr;35(4):e555-60
pubmed: 22495859
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Dec;80(12):1836-8; discussion 1846-50
pubmed: 9875944
J Reprod Med. 2017 Jan-Feb;62(1-2):31-6
pubmed: 29999279
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):e16
pubmed: 21368070
J Pediatr Surg. 1995 Feb;30(2):143-57
pubmed: 7738731
Arch Plast Surg. 2017 Sep;44(5):428-433
pubmed: 28946725
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Feb;140(2):102-5
pubmed: 24288048

Auteurs

Shyam A Patel (SA)

Orthopaedics, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.

Jillian Glasser (J)

Adult Reconstruction, University Orthopedics, Providence, USA.

Ellis M Berns (EM)

Orthopaedics, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, USA.

Caitlin C Barrett (CC)

Adult Reconstruction, University Orthopedics, Providence, USA.

Derek Jenkins (D)

Orthopaedics, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Adult Reconstruction, University Orthopedics, Providence, USA.

Valentin Antoci (V)

Orthopaedics, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Adult Reconstruction, University Orthopedics, Providence, USA.

Eric Cohen (E)

Orthopaedics, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Adult Reconstruction, University Orthopedics, Providence, USA.

John Froehlich (J)

Orthopaedics, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Adult Reconstruction, University Orthopedics, Providence, USA.

Classifications MeSH