The Efficacy of Proclarix to Select Appropriate Candidates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Derived Prostate Biopsies in Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer.

Clinically significant Diagnosis Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging Proclarix Prostate cancer

Journal

The world journal of men's health
ISSN: 2287-4208
Titre abrégé: World J Mens Health
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101596899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Historique:
received: 08 07 2021
revised: 28 08 2021
accepted: 29 08 2021
pubmed: 13 1 2022
medline: 13 1 2022
entrez: 12 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To analyze how Proclarix is valuable to appropriately select candidates for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and derived biopsies, among men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Proclarix is a new marker computing the clinically significant PCa (csPCa) risk, based on serum thosmbospondin-1, cathepsin D, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and percent free PSA, in addition to age, that has been developed in men with serum PSA 2 to 10 ng/mL, prostate volume ≥35 mL, and normal digital rectal examination (DRE). Proclarix score (0%-100%) is analyzed in a prospective frozen serum collection of 517 correlative men scheduled for guided and/or systematic biopsies after mpMRI. Outcome variables were csPCa detection (grade group ≥2), insignificant PCa (iPCa) overdetection and avoided mpMRIs. The area under the curve of Proclarix was 0.701 (95% CI 0.637-0.765) among 281 men with serum PSA 2 to 10 ng/mL, prostate volume ≥35 mL, and -normal DRE, and 0.754 (95% CI 0.701-0.807) in the others, p=0.038. Net benefit of Proclarix existed in all men. After selecting 10% threshold, Proclarix was integrated in an algorithm which also used the serum PSA level and DRE. A reduction of 25.4% of mpMRIs request was observed and 17.7% of prostate biopsies. Overdetection of iPCa was reduced in 18.2% and 2.6% of csPCa were misdiagnosed. Proclarix is valuable in all men with suspected PCa. An algorithm integrating Proclarix score, serum PSA, and DRE can avoid mpMRI requests, unnecessary prostate biopsies and iPCa overdetection, with minimal loss of csPCa detection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35021312
pii: 40.e21
doi: 10.5534/wjmh.210117
pmc: PMC8987145
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

270-279

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Références

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 5;11(1):1286
pubmed: 33674631
J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):1075-1081
pubmed: 33207137
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr 02;20(7):
pubmed: 30986955
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0233442
pubmed: 32421745
Ann Pathol. 2015 Dec;35(6):474-6
pubmed: 26586013
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):78-94
pubmed: 31326219
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;3(5):700-704
pubmed: 31548130
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2021 Aug;4(4):e1357
pubmed: 33661541
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40
pubmed: 26427566
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 23;13(9):
pubmed: 33922626
Mol Oncol. 2009 Feb;3(1):33-44
pubmed: 19383365
Urol J. 2007 Spring;4(2):95-100
pubmed: 17701929
Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):402-414
pubmed: 32444265
Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-57
pubmed: 22322308
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Dec;24(4):1110-1119
pubmed: 33941866
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Feb 16;:
pubmed: 33608234
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262
pubmed: 33172724
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Mar;22(1):101-109
pubmed: 30127462
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Jan 6;:
pubmed: 33422560
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;4(2):334-335
pubmed: 33663960
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 Jul-Aug;37(4):589-95
pubmed: 23863537
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):428-35
pubmed: 26166626
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913
pubmed: 29801017
BJU Int. 2019 May;123(5):826-833
pubmed: 30216634
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 22;108(8):3342-7
pubmed: 21300890
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Nov;2(6):664-669
pubmed: 31411977
Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):43-51
pubmed: 30824296
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 2;12(8):e0181557
pubmed: 28767721

Auteurs

Juan Morote (J)

Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. jmorote@vhebron.net.

Miriam Campistol (M)

Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

Anna Celma (A)

Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.

Lucas Regis (L)

Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.

Inés de Torres (I)

Department of Pathology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

María E Semidey (ME)

Department of Pathology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Sarai Roche (S)

Department of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

Richard Mast (R)

Department of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

Anna Santamaría (A)

Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.

Jacques Planas (J)

Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.

Enrique Trilla (E)

Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Classifications MeSH