Real-world data in elderly men from Yokosuka City 15 years after introducing prostate-specific antigen-based population screening.
early diagnosis
mass screening
mortality
prostate cancer
prostatic neoplasm
Journal
Molecular and clinical oncology
ISSN: 2049-9469
Titre abrégé: Mol Clin Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613422
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
03
08
2021
accepted:
21
10
2021
entrez:
10
1
2022
pubmed:
11
1
2022
medline:
11
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mass screening based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduces mortality in prostate cancer. However, the effectiveness of this screening in the elderly has not been demonstrated. In the city of Yokosuka, Japan, PSA screening has been conducted since 2001 and the present study examined the real-world status of PSA-based population screening in the elderly. It retrospectively evaluated 1,117 prostate cancer patients >75 years of age. The patients were divided into two groups: The screened group comprising patients diagnosed by PSA-based population screening or workplace screening and PSA follow-up patients at urology clinics; and the non-screened group comprising patients detected by other methods. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and factors contributing to shorter CSS between the groups were compared. In patients >75 years of age, the screened group had significantly longer OS (171 vs. 154 months; P=0.019) and CSS (median not reached; P=0.020) but screening was not an independent factor associated with prolonged OS or CSS on multivariate analysis. The factors contributing to shorten CSS in the elderly were ≥T3 (odds ratio: 3.301 [1.704-6.369], P<0.001), M1 (odds ratio: 4.856 [2.809-8.393], P<0.001) and Gleason score ≥8 (odds ratio: 4.691 [2.479-8.876], P<0.001). In those with metastasis, PSA screening was not associated with prolonged OS or CSS. Real-world data 15 years after introducing PSA-based population screening was not an independent factor for both OS and CSS in multivariate analyses for patients >75 years of age.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35003736
doi: 10.3892/mco.2021.2471
pii: MCO-16-2-02471
pmc: PMC8739438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
38Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Nirei et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):883-895
pubmed: 29509864
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Lancet. 2014 Dec 6;384(9959):2027-35
pubmed: 25108889
BMJ. 2018 Sep 5;362:k3519
pubmed: 30185521
Int J Public Health. 2012 Feb;57(1):57-62
pubmed: 21681451
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Dec;13(12):1534-61
pubmed: 26656522
Int J Urol. 2008 Feb;15(2):156-60; discussion 161
pubmed: 18269453
Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1111-1116
pubmed: 25917733
N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 8;317(15):909-16
pubmed: 2442609
Can J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(5):7496-506
pubmed: 25347377
Prostate. 2020 Aug;80(11):824-830
pubmed: 32433780
Int J Urol. 2015 Aug;22(8):747-52
pubmed: 26011393
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 5;374(18):1795-6
pubmed: 27144870
Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;123(4):592-599
pubmed: 27911486
Eur Urol. 2007 Mar;51(3):659-64
pubmed: 16934392
Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 1;127(11):2639-44
pubmed: 20196067
Clin Trials. 2010 Aug;7(4):303-11
pubmed: 20571134
Urol Int. 2020;104(3-4):230-238
pubmed: 31770767
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629
pubmed: 27568654
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913
pubmed: 29801017
Int J Urol. 2008 Sep;15(9):763-8
pubmed: 18786203
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1914-1931
pubmed: 29801018
Int J Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;137(7):1749-57
pubmed: 25821151
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):95-101
pubmed: 12665174